Some references to llvm-gcc were so crusty that I wasn't sure how to
proceed and so I've left them intact.
I also slipped in a quick peephole fix to use a :doc: link instead of
raw HTML link.
llvm-svn: 201619
From a cursory look it seems like all the described commandline options
and such apply to clang just fine, but I'd appreciate a second opinion.
llvm-svn: 201616
This makes Clang and LLVM -Wmsvc-include clean.
I believe the correct behavior here is to avoid updating the cache when
we find the header via MSVC's search rules.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2733
llvm-svn: 201615
Fix a bug where calling SBFrame::FindValue() would cause a copy of all variables in the block to be inserted in the frame's variable list, regardless of whether those same variables were there or not - which means one could end up with a frame with lots of duplicate copies of the same variables
llvm-svn: 201614
Summary:
Generally the vector deleting dtor, which we model as a vtable thunk,
takes care of non-virtual adjustment and delegates to the other
destructor variants. The other non-complete destructor variants assume
that 'this' on entry points to the virtual base subobject that first
declared the virtual destructor.
We need to change the adjustment in both the prologue and the vdtor call
setup.
Reviewers: timurrrr
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2821
llvm-svn: 201612
The IR
@foo = private constant i32 42
is valid, but before this patch we would produce an invalid MachO from it. It
was invalid because it would use an L label in a section where the liker needs
the labels in order to atomize it.
One way of fixing it would be to just reject this IR in the backend, but that
would not be very front end friendly.
What this patch does is use an 'l' prefix in sections that we know the linker
requires symbols for atomizing them. This allows frontends to just use
private and not worry about which sections they go to or how the linker handles
them.
One small issue with this strategy is that now a symbol name depends on the
section, which is not available before codegen. This is not a problem in
practice. The reason is that it only happens with private linkage, which will
be ignored by the non codegen users (llvm-nm and llvm-ar).
llvm-svn: 201608
This warning has a whole bunch of known false positives, much of them due
to code that is "sometimes unreachable". This can caused by code that
is conditionally generated by the preprocessor, branches that are defined
in terms of architecture-specific details (e.g., the size of a type), and
so on. While these are all good things to address one by one, the reality
is that this warning has received little love lately. By restricting
its purvue, we can focus on the top issues effecting main files, which
should be smaller, and then gradually widen the scope.
llvm-svn: 201607
findOrEmitSection).
Vaidas Gasiunas's patch, r201259, fixed one instance where we were always
allocating sections as text. This patch fixes the remaining buggy call sites.
No test case: This isn't breaking anything that I know of, it's just
inconsistent.
<rdar://problem/15943542>
llvm-svn: 201605
pexpect had a hack to work around some old buggy platforms, and as a
result of the hack running the tests on FreeBSD produced a stream of
kernel warnings in the system log:
Feb 5 17:19:11 feynman kernel: WARNING pid 11323 (python2.7):
ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffff80087467
The hack has now been removed upstream, so remove it here too.
llvm.org/pr18749
llvm-svn: 201603
In rare cases the modification of one scop can effect the validity of other
scops, as code generation of an earlier scop may make the scalar evolution
functions derived for later scops less precise. The example that triggered this
patch was a scop that contained an 'or' expression as follows:
%add13710 = or i32 %j.19, 1
--> {(1 + (4 * %l)),+,2}<nsw><%for.body81>
Scev could only analyze the 'or' as it knew %j.19 is a multiple of 2. This
information was not available after the first scop was code generated (or
independent-blocks was run on it) and SCEV could not derive a precise SCEV
expression any more. This means we could not any more code generate this SCoP.
My current understanding is that there is always the risk that an earlier code
generation change invalidates later scops. As the example we have seen here is
difficult to avoid, we use this occasion to guard us against all such
invalidations.
This patch "solves" this issue by verifying right before we start working on
a detected scop, if this scop is in fact still valid. This adds a certain
overhead. However the verification we run is anyways very fast and secondly
it is only run on detected scops. So the overhead should not be very large. As
a later optimization we could detect scops only on demand, such that we need
to run scop-detections always only a single time.
This should fix the single last failure in the LLVM test-suite for the new
scev-based code generation.
llvm-svn: 201593
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
This way the same RegisterContext class can support i386 and
amd64/x86_64 core files.
With some further refinement we should be able to merge all of the
processor-specific RegisterContextPOSIX_* classes into a single shared
one.
llvm-svn: 201577
Extended qualifiers can appear in many places, refactor the code so it's
more reusable. Add tests in areas where we've increased compatibility.
llvm-svn: 201574
Pointer types in the MSVC ABI are a bit awkward, the width of the
pointer is considered a kind of CVR qualifier.
Restrict is handled similarly to const and volatile but is mangled after
the pointer width qualifier.
This fixes PR18880.
llvm-svn: 201569
Richard Smith