As the related tests show, we're not canonicalizing to this form for scalars or vectors yet,
but this solves the immediate problem in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
llvm-svn: 297989
Summary:
I could be wrong but it seems to have no use for MinGW.
Related diff: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29772
Reviewers: chandlerc, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Patch by: Mateusz Mikuła
Subscribers: rnk, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29952
llvm-svn: 297985
This was discovered when running `llvm-pdbdump diff` against
two files, the second of which was generated by running the
first one through pdb2yaml and then yaml2pdb.
The second one was missing some bytes from the PDB Stream, and
tracking this down showed that at the end of the PDB Stream were
some additional bytes that we were ignoring. Looking back
to the reference code, these seem to specify some additional
flags that indicate whether the PDB supports various optional
features.
This patch adds support for reading, writing, and round-tripping
these flags through YAML and the raw dumper, and updates the
tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 297984
In doing so I discovered that we completely ignore some bytes
of the PDB Stream after we "finish" loading it. These bytes
seem to specify some additional information about what kind
of data is present in the PDB. A subsequent patch will add
code to read in those fields and store their values.
llvm-svn: 297983
In fact this default implementation should be the only implementation,
keep it virtual for now to accomodate targets that don't model flags
correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30747
llvm-svn: 297980
This patch improves debug info quality in InstCombine by looking at
values that are about to be deleted, checking whether there are any
dbg.value instrinsics referring to them, and potentially encoding the
semantics of the deleted instruction into the dbg.value's
DIExpression.
In the example in the testcase (which was extracted from XNU) there is a sequence of
%4 = load %struct.entry*, %struct.entry** %next2, align 8, !dbg !41
%5 = bitcast %struct.entry* %4 to i8*, !dbg !42
%add.ptr4 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %5, i64 -8, !dbg !43
%6 = bitcast i8* %add.ptr4 to %struct.entry*, !dbg !44
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %struct.entry* %6, i64 0, metadata !20, metadata !21), !dbg 34
When these instructions are eliminated by instcombine one after
another, we can still salvage the otherwise dead debug info:
- Bitcasts have no effect, so have the dbg.value point to operand(0)
- Loads can be expressed via a DW_OP_deref
- Constant gep instructions can be replaced by DWARF expression arithmetic
The API introduced by this patch is not specific to instcombine and
can be useful in other places, too.
rdar://problem/30725338
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30919
llvm-svn: 297971
This fixes a race condition where another linker process can observe a
partially written file if we copy it from another file system, and allows
the link to be independent of the amount of free disk space in $TMPDIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31045
llvm-svn: 297970
Earlier stages of GlobalISel always use ConstantInt in G_CONSTANT so that's
what we should check for.
This fixes a crash introduced in r297782.
llvm-svn: 297968
Citing http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32288
The DWARF generated by LLVM includes this location:
0x55 0x93 0x04 DW_OP_reg5 DW_OP_piece(4) When GCC's DWARF is simply
0x55 (DW_OP_reg5) without the DW_OP_piece. I believe it's reasonable
to assume the DWARF consumer knows which part of a register
logically holds the value (low bytes, high bytes, how many bytes,
etc) for a primitive value like an integer.
This patch gets rid of the redundant DW_OP_piece when a subregister is
at offset 0. It also adds previously missing subregister masking when
a subregister is followed by another operation.
(This reapplies r297960 with two additional testcase updates).
rdar://problem/31069390
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31010
llvm-svn: 297965
Summary:
clang-cl understands the GCC-style -W[no-]foo flags, and for the most
part ignores MSVC -wd flags. So, let's pass the curated set of warning
flags we use on Unix on Windows. We can also stop passing /W4 -wd*,
which for the most part corresponds to -Wall -Wextra with a bunch of
flags that we mostly ignore.
I had to disable -Wnon-virtual-dtor on Windows, because it fires on
every COM class ever. I filed PR32286 to fix this.
So far I've only found two instances of -Wstring-conversion in the
WinASan code, which I'll fix. Other than that we seem clean.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30992
llvm-svn: 297964
I checked that all of these out-of-line methods previously compiled to
simple loads and bittests, so they are pretty good candidates for
inlining. In particular, arg_size() and arg_empty() are popular and are
just two loads, so they seem worth inlining.
llvm-svn: 297963
Citing http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32288
The DWARF generated by LLVM includes this location:
0x55 0x93 0x04 DW_OP_reg5 DW_OP_piece(4) When GCC's DWARF is simply
0x55 (DW_OP_reg5) without the DW_OP_piece. I believe it's reasonable
to assume the DWARF consumer knows which part of a register
logically holds the value (low bytes, high bytes, how many bytes,
etc) for a primitive value like an integer.
This patch gets rid of the redundant DW_OP_piece when a subregister is
at offset 0. It also adds previously missing subregister masking when
a subregister is followed by another operation.
rdar://problem/31069390
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31010
llvm-svn: 297960
We can mark functions to always inline early in the opt. Since we do not have
call support this early inlining creates opportunities for inter-procedural
optimizations which would not occur otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31016
llvm-svn: 297958
Summary:
The call to canEvaluateZExtd in InstCombiner::visitZExt may
return with BitsToClear == SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(), but
there is an assert that BitsToClear should be smaller than
SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits().
I have a test case that triggers the assert, but it only happens
for my downstream target. I've not been able to trigger it for
any upstream target.
The assert triggered for a piece of code such as this
%shr1 = lshr i16 undef, 15
...
%shr2 = lshr i16 %shr1, 1
%conv = zext i16 %shr2 to i32
Normally the lshr instructions are constant folded before we
visit the zext (that is why it is so hard to reproduce).
The original pattern, before instcombine, is of course a lot more
complicated in my test case. The shift count in the second lshr
is for example determined by the outcome of a PHI instruction.
It seems like other rewrites by instcombine leads up to
the pattern above. And then the zext is pulled from the
worklist, and visited (hitting the assert), before we detect
that the lshr instrucions can be constant folded.
Anyway, since the canEvaluateZExtd may return with BitsToClear
equal to SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(), and since the rewrite
that converts the expression type to avoid a zero extend works
also for the case where SrcBitsKept ends up being zero, then
it should be OK to liberate the assert to
assert(BitsToClear <= SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits() &&
"Unreasonable BitsToClear");
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30993
llvm-svn: 297952
This change adds support for functions to set and get file permissions, in a similar manner to the C++17 permissions() function in <filesystem>. The setter uses chmod on Unix systems and SetFileAttributes on Windows, setting the permissions as passed in. The getter simply uses the existing status() function.
Prior to this change, status() would always return an unknown value for the permissions on a Windows file, making it impossible to test the new function on Windows. I have therefore added support for this as well. On Linux, prior to this change, the permissions included the file type, which should actually be accessed via a different member of the file_status class.
Note that on Windows, only the *_write permission bits have any affect - if any are set, the file is writable, and if not, the file is read-only. This is in common with what MSDN describes for their behaviour of std::filesystem::permissions(), and also what boost::filesystem does.
The motivation behind this change is so that we can easily test behaviour on read-only files in LLVM unit tests, but I am sure that others may find it useful in some situations.
Reviewers: zturner, amccarth, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30736
llvm-svn: 297945
in r297374.
I've extracted a small version of this from the C++ metaprogram Richard
came up with to exercise these kinds of issues and written comments to
describe both how to reproduce a fresh version of the test case and what
likely failure modes are.
The test case is still a bit brittle as it depends on the particular
inline cost modeling and SCC visitation order, but it definitely would
have caught the bug right away when developing things so it seems
a really valuable test case to have.
llvm-svn: 297935
Don't scalarize VSELECT->SETCC when operands/results needs to be widened,
or when the type of the SETCC operands are different from those of the VSELECT.
(VSELECT SETCC) and (VSELECT (AND/OR/XOR (SETCC,SETCC))) are handled.
The previous splitting of VSELECT->SETCC in DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT() is
no longer needed and has been removed.
Updated tests:
test/CodeGen/ARM/vuzp.ll
test/CodeGen/NVPTX/f16x2-instructions.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-19-widen_vselect.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-10-21-widen-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/psubus.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/vselect-pcmp.ll
Review: Eli Friedman, Simon Pilgrim
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29489
llvm-svn: 297930
Summary:
In commit r289548 ([ADCE] Add code to remove dead branches) a redundant loop
nest was accidentally introduced, which implements exactly the same
functionality as has already been available right after. This redundancy has
been found when inspecting the ADCE code in the context of our recent
discussions on post-dominator modeling. This redundant code was also eliminated
by r296535 (which sparked the discussion), but only as part of a larger semantic
change of the post-dominance modeling. As this redundency in [ADCE] is really
just an oversight completely independent of the post-dominance changes under
discussion, we remove this redundancy independently.
Reviewers: dberlin, david2050
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31023
llvm-svn: 297929
The idea is that the policy string fully specifies the policy and is portable
between clients.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31020
llvm-svn: 297927
This produces a 1% speedup on an important internal Google benchmark
(protocol buffers), with no other regressions in google or in the llvm
test-suite. Only 5 targets in the entire llvm test-suite are affected,
and on those 5 targets the size increase is 0.027%
llvm-svn: 297925
Zachary Turner