There was a failure on a bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-mipsel/builds/1283
strerror test is indeed flaky. We protect all races by a barrier in other tests
to eliminate flakiness. Do the same here.
No idea why tls_race2.cc failed. Add output at the end of the test
as we do in other tests. Sometimes test process crashes somewhere
in the middle (e.g. during race reporting) and it looks like empty output.
Output at the end of test allows to understand if the process has crashed,
or it has finished but produced no race reports.
Reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D42633
llvm-svn: 323657
This gets rid of a lit warning (input './projects/compiler-rt/test/xray/Unit' contained no tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42597
llvm-svn: 323613
In more recent Linux kernels with 47 bit VMAs the layout of virtual memory
for powerpc64 changed causing the address sanitizer to not work properly. This
patch fixes up a test case that was found to fail on some newer Fedora
releases that use different address ranges.
ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40907
llvm-svn: 323217
Summary:
One test-case uses a wrong operation (should be subtraction).
Second test-case should declare a global variables before a tested one
in order to guarantee we will find a red-zone.
Reviewers: kcc, jakubjelinek, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41481
llvm-svn: 323162
sequentially.
The current implementation of commands in
`test/sanitizer_common/ios_commands/` for iOS devices cannot be executed
in parallel which results in the ASan and TSan tests failing when
executed in parallel by lit which was the default behaviour.
We now force the ASan and TSan tests to be a new parallelism group named
`darwin-ios-device-sanitizer` which allows only one test to be run at a
time. We also emit a warning informing the user that tests are being
run sequentially.
This only applies if the target is an iOS device.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42156
llvm-svn: 323026
Summary:
Tests were being run by whole-linking the static library with our test binaries.
But since `-fsanitize=scudo` landed with rL317337, we might as well change how
the tests are compiled to use it.
The only difference will be on Android, where the clang flag links in the
dynamic library instead, but the bots are already pushing
`libclang_rt.*-android.so` to the device there is no additional change needed.
Tested locally, including with a standalone build, and an Android one on a O
device, and it all passes.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42243
llvm-svn: 322882
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322755
Summary:
This patch (on top of the previous two (https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899) complete the compiler-rt side of the the Solaris
sanitizer port.
It contains the following sets of changes:
* For the time being, the port is for 32-bit x86 only, so reject the various tests on
x86_64.
* When compiling as C++, <setjmp.h> resp. <iso/setjmp_iso.h> only declares
_setjmp and _longjmp inside namespace std.
* MAP_FILE is a Windows feature. While e.g. Linux <sys/mman.h> provides a
no-op compat define, Solaris does not.
* test/asan/TestCases/Posix/coverage.cc was initially failing like this:
/vol/gcc/src/llvm/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/scripts/sancov.py: 4 files merged; 2 PCs total
rm: cannot remove '/var/gcc/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/I386SunOSConfig/TestCases/Posix/Output/coverage': Invalid argument
Further digging revealed that the rm was trying to remove the running test's working
directory which failed as observed. cd'ing out of the dir before let the test pass.
* Two tests needed a declaration of alloca. I've now copied the existing code from
test/asan/TestCases/alloca_constant_size.cc, but it may be more profitable and
maintainable to have a common testsuite header where such code is collected.
* Similarly, Solaris' printf %p format doesn't include the leading 0x.
* In test/asan/TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c, I had to undef __EXTENSIONS__
(predefined by clang for no apparent reason) to avoid conflicting declarations
for memalign.
* test/ubsan/TestCases/Float/cast-overflow.cpp has different platform dependent
ways to define BYTE_ORDER and friends. Why not just use __BYTE_ORDER__ and
friends as predefined by clang and gcc?
Patch by Rainer Orth.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40900
llvm-svn: 322635
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322604
Summary:
Very basic stack instrumentation using tagged pointers.
Tag for N'th alloca in a function is built as XOR of:
* base tag for the function, which is just some bits of SP (poor
man's random)
* small constant which is a function of N.
Allocas are aligned to 16 bytes. On every ReturnInst allocas are
re-tagged to catch use-after-return.
This implementation has a bunch of issues that will be taken care of
later:
1. lifetime intrinsics referring to tagged pointers are not
recognized in SDAG. This effectively disables stack coloring.
2. Generated code is quite inefficient. There is one extra
instruction at each memory access that adds the base tag to the
untagged alloca address. It would be better to keep tagged SP in a
callee-saved register and address allocas as an offset of that XOR
retag, but that needs better coordination between hwasan
instrumentation pass and prologue/epilogue insertion.
3. Lifetime instrinsics are ignored and use-after-scope is not
implemented. This would be harder to do than in ASan, because we
need to use a differently tagged pointer depending on which
lifetime.start / lifetime.end the current instruction is dominated
/ post-dominated.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41602
llvm-svn: 322324
Summary:
Enable the compile-time flag -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor by
default. Note that the run-time option MSAN_OPTIONS=poison_in_dtor=1
still needs to be enabled for destructors to be poisoned.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka, kcc
Reviewed By: eugenis, vitalybuka
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37860
llvm-svn: 322221
Summary:
Avoid flaky test failures by by using a monotonic number sequence of
heap tags.
Does not affect stack tags: the way we generate those guarantees
uniqueness for at least 30-something first allocas in any function,
as well as the UAR tag.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41882
llvm-svn: 322214
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
This change removes exception specifications from the function types recorded
for -fsanitize=function, both in the functions themselves and at the call sites.
That means that calling a non-noexcept function through a noexcept pointer will
also not be flagged as UB. In the review of this change, that was deemed
acceptable, at least for now. (See the "TODO" in compiler-rt
test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/Function/function.cpp.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 321860
Summary:
It used to fail on the bots, but I could not repro it locally. So turn it back
on to try and see if it still fails and maybe get to the heart of it.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, flowerhack
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: aemerson, srhines, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41707
llvm-svn: 321812
Summary: Extend the sendmsg test to cover all recv*.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41620
llvm-svn: 321774
...when such an operation is done on an object during con-/destruction.
(This adds a test case to compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/vptr.cpp
that, unlike the existing test cases there, wants to detect multiple UBSan
warnings in one go. Therefore, that file had to be changed from globally using
-fno-sanitize-recover to individually using halt_on_error only where
appropriate.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40295
llvm-svn: 321518
Summary:
Export aligned new/delete to make dynamic runtimes work again.
Remove all valid new/delete cases from ASan test, there's a test in
common for that.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41548
llvm-svn: 321394
Summary:
Providing aligned new/delete implementations to match ASan.
Unlike ASan, MSan and TSan do not perform any additional checks
on overaligned memory, hence no sanitizer specific tests.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41532
llvm-svn: 321365
Summary: Very similar to AddressSanitizer, with the exception of the error type encoding.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: cfe-commits, kubamracek, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41417
llvm-svn: 321203
There could be a situation when a specific DSO was built with FORTIFY_SOURCE option. In case asan-ed binary link against that DSO,
libasan can't handle the possible memory error because it does not have interceptors for spinrtf_chk, snprintf_chk, vprintf_chk,
vsnprintf_chk, __fprintf_chk functions. Let's interceptors for them.
Patch by Denis Khalikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40951
llvm-svn: 320990
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320981
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320977
This includes a few nice bits of refactoring (e.g splitting out the
exclusive locking code into a common utility).
Hopefully the Windows support is fixed now.
Patch by Rainer Orth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40944
llvm-svn: 320731
This includes a few nice bits of refactoring (e.g splitting out the
exclusive locking code into a common utility).
Patch by Rainer Orth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40944
llvm-svn: 320726
Dmitry Vyukov