Summary:
Index is the proper type for storing shapes when constant folding, so
this fixes the previous code (which was using i64).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80600
- This allow us to specify the (minimal) alignment on an intrinsic's
arguments and, more importantly, the return value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80422
- Argument attribute needs specifiying through `ArgIndex<n>`
(corresponding to `FirstArgIndex`) to distinguish explicitly from the
index number from the overloaded type list.
- In addition, `RetIndex` (corresponding to `ReturnIndex`) and
`FuncIndex` (corresponding to `FunctionIndex`) are introduced for us
to associate attributes on the return value and potentially function
itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80422
Many edge cases, e.g. wrapped ranges, can be processed
precisely without bailout. However it's very unlikely that
memory access with min/max integer offsets will be
classified as safe anyway.
Early bailout may help with ThinLTO where we can
drop unsafe parameters from summaries.
I just spent a bunch of time debugging a mysterious bug that ended being due to my SmallVector getting passed to the Args&... overload instead of the MutableArrayRef overload, with disastrous results.
I appreciate the intent of this API, but for a function that does a bunch of unsafe casts, adding in potential overload confusion is just too much C++ footgun. If we end up needing this functionality, having something like a separate `packArgs(Args&...) -> SmallVector` overload would be preferable.
Turns out this API is unused and untested (even out of tree as far as I can tell, modulo the optional passing of no args to the other invoke as I fixed in this patch), so it's an easy fix -- just delete it and touch up the other overload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80607
If we have a memory instruction (e.g. a load), we shouldn't combine it away in
some trivial combine.
It's possible that, say, a call lives between the instructions. This could
modify the value loaded, making the load instructions not safe to fold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80053
The reproducer don't model timeouts so tests that rely on them end up
with unexpected packets during replay. Skip them until we can handle
this scenario.
Although it's not entirely clear to me why, this test was generating its
binary in the source directory instead of the build directory. This
patch fixes that following the same approach as other tests.
Looking back over gcc and icc behavior it looks like icc does
use mulx32 on 32-bit targets and mulx64 on 64-bit targets. It's
also used when dividing i32 by constant on 32-bit targets and
i64 by constant on 64-bit targets.
gcc uses it multiplies producing a 64 bit result on 32-bit targets
and 128-bit results on a 64-bit target. gcc does not appear to use
it for division by constant.
After this patch clang is closer to the icc behavior. This
basically reverts d1c61861dd, but
there were no strong feelings at the time.
Fixes PR45518.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80498
ProfileSummaryInfo is updated seldom, as result of very specific
triggers. This patch clearly demarcates state updates from read-only uses.
This, arguably, improves readability and maintainability.
This is the groundwork required to implement strictfp. For now, this
should be NFC for regular instructoins (many instructions just gain an
extra use of a reserved register). Regalloc won't rematerialize
instructions with reads of physical registers, but we were suffering
from that anyway with the exec reads.
Should add it for all the related FP uses (possibly with some
extras). I did not add it to either the gpr index mode instructions
(or every single VALU instruction) since it's a ridiculous feature
already modeled as an arbitrary side effect.
Also work towards marking instructions with FP exceptions. This
doesn't actually set the bit yet since this would start to change
codegen. It seems nofpexcept is currently not implied from the regular
IR FP operations. Add it to some MIR tests where I think it might
matter.
The current pattern matching for zext results in the following code snippet
being produced,
w1 = w0
r1 <<= 32
r1 >>= 32
Because BPF implementations require zero extension on 32bit loads this
both adds a few extra unneeded instructions but also makes it a bit
harder for the verifier to track the r1 register bounds. For example in
this verifier trace we see at the end of the snippet R2 offset is unknown.
However, if we track this correctly we see w1 should have the same bounds
as r8. R8 smax is less than U32 max value so a zero extend load should keep
the same value. Adding a max value of 800 (R8=inv(id=0,smax_value=800)) to
an off=0, as seen in R7 should create a max offset of 800. However at the
end of the snippet we note the R2 max offset is 0xffffFFFF.
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=800)
R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=2147483647,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff))
R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R7=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0)
R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=800,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R9=inv800 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
58: (1c) w9 -= w8
59: (bc) w1 = w8
60: (67) r1 <<= 32
61: (77) r1 >>= 32
62: (bf) r2 = r7
63: (0f) r2 += r1
64: (bf) r1 = r6
65: (bc) w3 = w9
66: (b7) r4 = 0
67: (85) call bpf_get_stack#67
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=800)
R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff))
R4_w=inv0 R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R7=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,imm=0)
R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=800,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R9_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff))
R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmm????
After this patch R1 bounds are not smashed by the <<=32 >>=32 shift and we
get correct bounds on R2 umax_value=800.
Further it reduces 3 insns to 1.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73985
Summary:
This patch simply adds support for the new CPU in anticipation of
Power10. There isn't really any functionality added so there are no
associated test cases at this time.
Reviewers: stefanp, nemanjai, amyk, hfinkel, power-llvm-team, #powerpc
Reviewed By: stefanp, nemanjai, amyk, #powerpc
Subscribers: NeHuang, steven.zhang, hiraditya, llvm-commits, wuzish, shchenz, cfe-commits, kbarton, echristo
Tags: #clang, #powerpc, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80020
code motion
Summary: Currently isSafeToMoveBefore uses DFS numbering for determining
the relative position of instruction and insert point which is not
always correct. This PR proposes the use of Dominator Tree depth for the
same. If a node is at a higher level than the insert point then it is
safe to say that we want to move in the forward direction.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, nikic, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80084
Use getFunctionEntryPointSymbol whenever possible to enclose the
implementation detail and reduce duplicate logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80402
This will enable selecting non-entry block allocas. Skip the SP write
check in the base isSchedulingBoundary implementation to preserve the
previous scheduling behavior and avoid test churn. It's apparently for
compile time reasons, but if we were to use this more work would be
needed since in some of the failing tests, we seem to incorrectly get
hazard nops inserted.
Summary:
For https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/382
This commit adds access specifier information to the hover
contents. For example, the hover information of a class field or
member function will now indicate if the field or member is private,
public, or protected. This can be particularly useful when a developer
is in the implementation file and wants to know if a particular member
definition is public or private.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80472
The purpose of the LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY macro is twofold: it is used in
functions that take arguments that we don't know how to serialize (e.g.
void*) and it's used by function where we want to avoid doing excessive
work because they can be called from a signal handler (e.g.
setTerminalWidth).
To support the latter case, I've disabled API logging form the Recorder
ctor used by the DUMMY macro. This ensures we don't allocate memory when
called from a signal handler.
All 3 passes that change instruction encodings were dropping MI
flags. This avoids scheduling regressions caused by setting
mayRaiseFPExceptions on FP instructions for non-strictfp functions.
Summary:
It turns out that the order in which we provide completions for expressions is
nondeterministic. This leads to confusing user experience and also breaks the
reproducer tests (as two LLDB tests can go out of sync due to the
non-determinism in the completion lists)
The reason for the non-determinism is that the CompletionConsumer informs us
about decls in the order in which it finds declarations in the lookup store of
the DeclContexts it visits (mainly this snippet in SemaLookup.cpp):
``` lang=c++
// Enumerate all of the results in this context.
for (DeclContextLookupResult R :
Load ? Ctx->lookups()
: Ctx->noload_lookups(/*PreserveInternalState=*/false)) {
[...]
```
This storage of the lookup is sorted by pointer values (see the hash of
`DeclarationName`) and can therefore be non-deterministic. The LLDB code
completion consumer that receives these calls originally expected that the order
of declarations is defined by Clang, but it seems the API expects the client to
provide an order to the completions.
This patch fixes the issue as follows:
* We sort the completions we get from Clang alphabetically and also by the
priority value we get from Clang (with priority value sorting having precedence
over the alphabetical sorting)
* We make all the functions/variables that touch a completion before the sorting
const-qualified. The idea is that this should prevent that we never have
observable side-effect from touching these declarations in a non-deterministic
order (e.g., we don't try to complete the type by accident).
This way we behave like the other parts of Clang which also sort the results by
some deterministic value (usually the name or something computed from a name,
e.g., edit distance to a given string).
We most likely also need to fix the Clang code to make the loop I listed above
deterministic to prevent these issues in the future (tracked in rdar://63442513
). This wouldn't replace the functionality provided in this patch though as we
would still need the priority and overall alphabetical sorting.
Note: I had to increase the lldb-vscode completion limit to 100 as the tests
look for strings that aren't in the first 50 results anymore due to variable
names starting with letters like 'v' (which are now always shown much further
down in the list due to the alphabetical sorting).
Fixes rdar://63200995
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgrang, abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80292
ffmpeg/libavcodec/x86/h264_cabac.c inline assembly may produce
movzb 1280(%rbx, %r12), %r12
After D80608, llvm-mc errors:
error: unknown use of instruction mnemonic without a size suffix
This allocation of a workgroup memory is lowered to a
spv.globalVariable. Only static size allocation with element type
being int or float is handled. The lowering does account for the
element type that are not supported in the lowered spv.module based on
the extensions/capabilities and adjusts the number of elements to get
the same byte length.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80411
Summary:
When working with the DDG it's useful to be able to query details of the
memory dependencies between two nodes connected by a memory edge. The DDG
does not hold a copy of the dependencies, but it contains a reference to a
DependenceInfo object through which dependence information can be queried.
This patch adds a query function to the DDG to obtain all the Dependence
objects that exist between instructions of two nodes.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewers: Meinersbur, Whitney, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80529
Summary:
This includes a basic implementation for the OpenMP parallel
operation without a custom pretty-printer and parser.
The if, num_threads, private, shared, first_private, last_private,
proc_bind and default clauses are included in this implementation.
Currently the reduction clause is omitted as it is more complex and
requires analysis to see if we can share implementation with the loop
dialect. The allocate clause is also omitted.
A discussion about the design of this operation can be found here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/openmp-parallel-operation-design-issues/686
The current OpenMP Specification can be found here:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf
Co-authored-by: Kiran Chandramohan <kiran.chandramohan@arm.com>
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, yaxunl, kristof.beyls, guansong, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79410
In the current statepoint design, we have four distinct groups of operands to the call: call args, gc transition args, deopt args, and gc args. This format prexisted the support in IR for operand bundles and was in fact one of the inspirations for the extension. However, we never went back and rearchitected statepoints to fully leverage bundles.
This change is the first in a small sequence to do so. All this does is extend the SelectionDAG lowering code to allow deopt and gc transition operands to be specified in either inline argument bundles or operand bundles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D8059
Unlike other platforms using ItaniumCXXABI, Darwin does not allow the
creation of a thread-wrapper function for a variable in the TU of
users. Because of this, it can set the linkage of the thread-local
symbol to internal, with the assumption that no TUs other than the one
defining the variable will need it.
However, constinit thread_local variables do not require the use of
the thread-wrapper call, so users reference the variable
directly. Thus, it must not be converted to internal, or users will
get a link failure.
This was a regression introduced by the optimization in
00223827a9.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80417
Take advantage of equality constrains to generate the type inference interface.
This is used for equality and trivially built types. The type inference method
is only generated when no type inference trait is specified already.
This reorders verification that changes some test error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80484
Louis Dionne