R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 was not handled properly.
Next sample app was impossible to link before this patch:
~/pg/release/bin/clang -target x86_64-pc-linux testthread.cpp -c -g
~/pg/d+a/bin/ld.lld testthread.o
"Unknown TLS optimization" (value was 17)
__thread int x = 0;
void _start() {
}
It works fine now.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18039
llvm-svn: 263150
Previously error and warnings were not consistent in lld.
Some of them started from lowercase letter, others from
uppercase. Also there was one or two which had a dot at the end.
This patch changes all messages to start from uppercase letter if
they were not before.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18045
llvm-svn: 263125
It was a badly specified hack for when a tls relocation should be
propagated to the dynamic relocation table.
This replaces it with a not as bad hack of saying that a local dynamic
tls relocation is never preempted.
I will try to remove even that second hack in the next patch.
llvm-svn: 262955
Get rid of few accessors in that class, and replace
them with direct fields access.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17879
llvm-svn: 262796
Patch changes the return type of Target::relaxTls
to size_t from unsigned. That is consistent with
its use from other code.
Change was reviewed http://reviews.llvm.org/D17882
and asked to commit separately from that patch above.
llvm-svn: 262794
Patch changes all relocations types to be uint32_t and also
fixes some dependent inconsistency in callers code.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17882
llvm-svn: 262793
The rules for when we can relax tls relocations are target independent.
The only things that are target dependent are the relocation values.
llvm-svn: 262748
SymbolBody constructor and friends take isFunc and isTLS boolean arguments.
ELF symbols have already a type so than be easily passed as argument.
If we want to support another type, this scheme is not good enough, that is,
the current code logic would require passing another `bool isObject` around.
Up to two argument, this stretching exercise was a little bit goofy but
still acceptable, but with more types to support, is just too much, IMHO.
Change the code so that the type is passed instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17871
llvm-svn: 262684
The hack of using a plt address as the address of an undefined function
only works in executables. Don't try it with shared libraries.
llvm-svn: 262642
For shared libraries we allow any weak undefined symbol to eventually be
resolved, even if we never see a definition in another .so. This matches
the behavior when handling other undefined symbols in a shared library.
For executables, we require seeing a definition in a .so or resolve it
to zero. This is also similar to how non weak symbols are handled.
llvm-svn: 262017
When this code was first added it was compensating for the code deciding
to create plt entries for directly referenced functions being too aggressive.
That has since been fixed, so we don't need this anymore.
llvm-svn: 261933
This commit does two related thing. At first, it enumerates supported
absolute MIPS relocations in the `MipsTargetInfo<ELFT>::isRelRelative`
method. In that case the code is shorter and the case switch does not
tend to grow. At second, it prevents R_MIPS_COPY and PLT creation for
relative relocations. For almost all relative MIPS relocations like
R_MIPS_PC19_S2, R_MIPS_PCHI16 etc it does not have a sence. The only
exception is R_MIPS_PC32. GNU linker creates a copy relocation or PLT
entry for it. But I could not find any real test case uses R_MIPS_PC32
with DSO defined symbol as a target. So for now I prefer to skip this
case to simplify the LLD code.
llvm-svn: 261822
There is nothing aarch64 specific in here. If a symbol can be preempted,
we need to copy the full relocation to the dynamic linker.
If a symbol cannot be preempted, we can make the dynamic linker life
easier and produce a relative relocation.
This is directly equivalent to R_X86_64_64 to R_x86_64_RELATIVE
conversion.
llvm-svn: 261678
This patch fixes the R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation when used in shared mode,
where it requires a dynamic R_AARCH64_RELATIVE relocation. To correct set
the addend on the dynamic relocation (since it will be used by the dynamic
linker), a new TargetInfo specific hook was created (getDynRelativeAddend)
to get the correct addend based on relocation type.
The patch fixes the issues when creating shared library code against
{init,fini}_array, where it issues R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation against
local symbols.
llvm-svn: 261651
This patch adds some TLS relocations and relaxations for AArch64.
Some Global-Dynamic relocation are handled by optimizing them to
Local-Exec (Initial-Exec is not yet supported). They are:
- R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_ADR_PAGE21
- R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_LD64_LO12_NC
- R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_ADD_LO12_NC
- R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_CALL
Also some Init-Exec is optimized to Local-Exec if possible. They are:
- R_AARCH64_TLSIE_ADR_GOTTPREL_PAGE21
- R_AARCH64_TLSIE_LD64_GOTTPREL_LO12_NC
Finally some Local-Exec relocation are handled in relocateOne:
- R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12
- R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_LO12_NC
This work is mainly for compiler bootstrap, where static binaries is
showing good progress (although shared object still lacking support
from both TLS aarch64 backend and some other issues).
llvm-svn: 260677
Previously, Target held a value until a new value is assigned to the
variable. That was a benign leak -- that was not an unbounded leak
and didn't grab any resources except a small amount of memory. But
it is better to fix than leaving as is.
llvm-svn: 260592
R_X86_64_TPOFF64 is a dynamic relocation,
it should not appear in static relocation processing.
Patch fixes it.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16880
llvm-svn: 260508
The patch adds lazy relocation support for MIPS and R_MIPS_26 relocation
handing.
R_MIPS_26 relocation might require PLT entry creation. In that case it
is fully supported by the patch. But if the relocation target is a local
symbol we need to use a different expression to calculate the relocation
result. This case is not implemented yet because there is no method to
get know the kind of relocation target in the `relocateOne` routine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16982
llvm-svn: 260424
MIPS 32-bit ABI uses REL relocation record format. We read addends from
relocation destinations right in the MipsTargetInfo::relocateOne
function.
llvm-svn: 260364
This is the function equivalent of a copy relocation.
Since functions are expected to change sizes, we cannot use copy
relocations. In situations where one would be needed, what is done
instead is:
* Create a plt entry
* Output an undefined symbol whose addr is the plt entry.
The dynamic linker makes sure any shared library uses the plt entry as
the function address.
llvm-svn: 260224
Symbol does not need an entry i the 'global' part of GOT if it cannot be
preempted. So canBePreempted fully satisfies us at least for now.
llvm-svn: 259779
This function is a predicate that a given relocation can be relaxed.
The previous name implied that it returns true if a given relocation
has already been optimized away.
llvm-svn: 259128
In many situations, we don't want to exit at the first error even in the
process model. For example, it is better to report all undefined symbols
rather than reporting the first one that the linker picked up randomly.
In order to handle such errors, we don't need to wrap everything with
ErrorOr (thanks for David Blaikie for pointing this out!) Instead, we
can set a flag to record the fact that we found an error and keep it
going until it reaches a reasonable checkpoint.
This idea should be applicable to other places. For example, we can
ignore broken relocations and check for errors after visiting all relocs.
In this patch, I rename error to fatal, and introduce another version of
error which doesn't call exit. That function instead sets HasError to true.
Once HasError becomes true, it stays true, so that we know that there
was an error if it is true.
I think introducing a non-noreturn error reporting function is by itself
a good idea, and it looks to me that this also provides a gradual path
towards lld-as-a-library (or at least embed-lld-to-your-program) without
sacrificing code readability with lots of ErrorOr's.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16641
llvm-svn: 259069
In InputSection.cpp it was possible to dereference null.
Had to change signature of relocateTlsOptimize to accept pointer instead of reference.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16466
llvm-svn: 258508
Some MIPS relocation (for now R_MIPS_GOT16) requires creation of GOT
entries for symbol not included in the dynamic symbol table. They are
local symbols and non-local symbols with 'local' visibility. Local GOT
entries occupy continuous block between GOT header and regular GOT
entries.
The patch adds initial support for handling local GOT entries. The main
problem is allocating local GOT entries for local symbols. Such entries
should be initialized by high 16-bit of the symbol value. In ideal world
there should be no duplicated entries with the same values. But at the
moment of the `Writer::scanRelocs` call we do not know a value of the
symbol. In this patch we create new local GOT entry for each relocation
against local symbol, though we can exhaust GOT quickly. That needs to
be optimized later. When we calculate relocation we know a final symbol
value and request local GOT entry index. To do that we maintain map
between addresses and local GOT entry indexes. If we start to calculate
relocations in parallel we will have to serialize access to this map.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16324
llvm-svn: 258388
MIPS ABI has relocations like R_MIPS_JALR which is just a hint for
linker to make some code optimization. Such relocations should not be
handled as a regular ones and lead to say dynamic relocation creation.
The patch introduces new virtual `Target::isHintReloc` method, overrides
it in the `MipsTargetInfo` class and calls it in the `Writer<ELFT>::scanRelocs`
method.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16193
llvm-svn: 257798
Fix: Added missed input file.
Initial commit message:
[ELF/AArch64] - Implemented R_AARCH64_TLSIE_ADR_GOTTPREL_PAGE21 and R_AARCH64_TLSIE_LD64_GOTTPREL_LO12_NC relocations
* R_AARCH64_TLSIE_ADR_GOTTPREL_PAGE21 is calculated as Page(G(GTPREL(S+A))) – Page(P), set an ADRP immediate field to bits [32:12] of X; check –2^32 ≤ X < 2^32;
* R_AARCH64_TLSIE_LD64_GOTTPREL_LO12_NC is calculated as G(GTPREL(S+A)), set an LD offset field to bits [11:3] of X. No overflow check; check that X&7 = 0.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16117
llvm-svn: 257596
* R_AARCH64_TLSIE_ADR_GOTTPREL_PAGE21 is calculated as Page(G(GTPREL(S+A))) – Page(P), set an ADRP immediate field to bits [32:12] of X; check –2^32 ≤ X < 2^32;
* R_AARCH64_TLSIE_LD64_GOTTPREL_LO12_NC is calculated as G(GTPREL(S+A)), set an LD offset field to bits [11:3] of X. No overflow check; check that X&7 = 0.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16117
llvm-svn: 257588
R_AARCH64_TSTBR14 is calculated as S+A-P,
Set the immediate field of a TBZ/TBNZ instruction to bits [15:2] of X; check -2^15 ≤ X < 2^15
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15824
llvm-svn: 257334
R_AARCH64_CONDBR19 is calculated as S+A-P,
Set the immediate field of a conditional branch instruction to bits [20:2] of X; check -2^20 ≤ X< 2^20.
Afaik there is no document for AARCH64 instruction encoding from official for unknown reason, so
I used gold source code and next link as a reference for implementation: http://kitoslab-eng.blogspot.ru/2012/10/armv8-aarch64-instruction-encoding.html. From which is clear that immediate field of a conditional branch instruction is 5 bits off. That is proved by output which is is equal to gold/bfd now.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15809
llvm-svn: 257333
R_X86_64_PLT32 is handled in the same way as R_X86_64_PC32 by
relocateOne(), so this function does not seems to be needed.
Without this code, all tests still pass.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15971
llvm-svn: 257203
All non-trivial relocation decisions need explanations like this
to help readers understand not only how relocations are handled but
why they are handled these ways. This is a start.
llvm-svn: 257119
Summary: This will allow us to remove the AMDGPU support from old ELF.
Reviewers: rafael, ruiu
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15895
llvm-svn: 257023
The R_MIPS_GPREL16 / R_MIPS_GPREL32 relocations use the following
expressions for calculations:
```
local symbol: S + A + GP0 - GP
global symbol: S + A - GP
GP - Represents the final gp value, i.e. _gp symbol
GP0 - Represents the gp value used to create the relocatable object
```
The GP0 value is taken from the .reginfo data section defined by an object
file. To implement that I keep a reference to `MipsReginfoInputSection`
in the `ObjectFile` class. This reference is used by the
`ObjectFile::getMipsGp0` method to return the GP0 value.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15760
llvm-svn: 256416
The patch adds support for R_MIPS_PC16, R_MIPS_PC19_S2, R_MIPS_PC21_S2,
R_MIPS_PC26_S2, R_MIPS_PCHI16, R_MIPS_PCLO16 relocations handling.
llvm-svn: 256172
This relocation is similar to R_*_RELATIVE except that the value used in this relocation is the program address returned by the function, which takes no arguments, at the address of
the result of the corresponding R_*_RELATIVE relocation as specified in the processor-specific ABI. The purpose of this relocation to avoid name lookup for locally defined STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols at load-time.
More info can be found in ifunc.txt from https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/documents.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15235
llvm-svn: 256144
R_386_GOTOFF is calculated as S + A - GOT, where:
S - Represents the value of the symbol whose index resides in the relocation entry.
A - Represents the addend used to compute the value of the relocatable field.
GOT - Represents the address of the global offset table.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15383
llvm-svn: 256143
@indntpoff is similar to @gotntpoff, but for use in position dependent code. While @gotntpoff resolves to GOT slot address relative to the
start of the GOT in the movl or addl instructions, @indntpoff resolves to the
absolute GOT slot address. ("ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage", Ulrich Drepper).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15494
llvm-svn: 255884
The `R_MIPS_JALR` is a relocation generated by gcc and gas. This
relocation points to the `jalr` instruction which might be optimized and
converted to the `b` instruction under some conditions.
Now we just ignore this relocation and keep instructions unchanged.
llvm-svn: 255453
R_X86_64_SIZE64/R_X86_64_SIZE32 relocations were introduced in 0.98v of "System V Application Binary Interface x86-64" (http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf).
Calculation for them is Z + A, where:
Z - Represents the size of the symbol whose index resides in the relocation entry.
A - Represents the addend used to compute the value of the relocatable field.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15335
llvm-svn: 255332
If R_386_PLT32 relocation is applied against symbol that can not be preempted then it can be resolved statically.
Patch implements it for x86 target.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15376
llvm-svn: 255233
Implement the TLS relocation optimization for 32-bit x86 that is described in
"ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage" by Ulrich Drepper, chapter 5,
"IA-32 Linker Optimizations". Specifically, this patch implements these
optimizations: LD->LE, GD->IE, GD->LD, and IE->LE.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15292
llvm-svn: 255103
All relocations, which cannot be handled by the dynamic linker,
cause a linking error "rebuild with -fPIC".
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15193
llvm-svn: 254840
"Ulrich Drepper, ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage" (5.5 x86-x64 linker optimizations, http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf) shows how GD can be optimized to IE.
This patch implements the optimization.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15000
llvm-svn: 254713
Main aim of the patch to introduce basic support for TLS access models for x86 target.
Models using @tlsgd, @tlsldm and @gotntpoff are implemented.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15060
llvm-svn: 254500
Some MIPS relocations including `R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16` use combined
addends. Such addend is calculated using addends of both paired relocations.
Each `R_MIPS_HI16` relocation is paired with the next `R_MIPS_LO16`
relocation. ABI requires to compute such combined addend in case of REL
relocation record format only.
For details see p. 4-17 at
ftp://www.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/doc/ABI/mipsabi.pdf
This patch implements lookup of the next paired relocation suing new
`InputSectionBase::findPairedRelocLocation` method. The primary
disadvantage of this approach is that we put MIPS specific logic into
the common code. The next disadvantage is that we lookup `R_MIPS_LO16`
for each `R_MIPS_HI16` relocation, while in fact multiple `R_MIPS_HI16`
might be paired with the single `R_MIPS_LO16`. From the other side
this way allows us to keep `MipsTargetInfo` class stateless and implement
later relocation handling in parallel.
This patch does not support `R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16` relocations against
`_gp_disp` symbol. In that case the relocations use a special formula for
the calculation. That will be implemented later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15112
llvm-svn: 254461
ABI specifies the allowed range for these relocations as 2^(n-1) <= X < 2^n.
The patch fixes checks and introduces precise tests for these relocations.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14957
llvm-svn: 254146
Implements @tlsld (LD to LE) and @tlsgd (GD to LE) optimizations.
Patch does not implement the GD->IE case for @tlsgd.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14870
llvm-svn: 254101
Patch implements lazy relocations for x86.
One of features of x86 is that executable files and shared object files have separate procedure linkage tables. So patch implements both cases.
Detailed information about instructions used can be found in http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19620-01/805-3050/chapter6-1235/index.html (search: x86: Procedure Linkage Table).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14955
llvm-svn: 254098
R_MIPS_CALL16 relocation provides the same result as R_MIPS_GOT16
relocation but does not need to check the result on overflow.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14916
llvm-svn: 254092
This patch implements next relocations:
R_386_TLS_LE - Negative offset relative to static TLS (GNU version).
R_386_TLS_LE_32 - Offset relative to static TLS block.
These ones are created when using next code sequences:
* @tpoff - The operator must be used to compute an immediate value. The linker will report
an error if the referenced variable is not defined or it is not code for the executable
itself. No GOT entry is created in this case.
* @ntpoff Calculate the negative offset of the variable it is added to relative to the static TLS block.
The operator must be used to compute an immediate value. The linker will report
an error if the referenced variable is not defined or it is not code for the executable
itself. No GOT entry is created in this case.
Information was found in Ulrich Drepper, ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage, http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf, (6.2, p76)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14930
llvm-svn: 254090
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/817-3677/chapter6-26/index.html says:
R_386_GOTPC
Resembles R_386_PC32, except that it uses the address of the global offset table in its calculation. The symbol referenced in this relocation normally is _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, which also instructs the link-editor to create the global offset table.
Currently _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ has value == zero. And we use GOT address to calculate the relocation. This patch does not changes that. It just removes the method which is used only for x86. So it is close to non functional change.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14993
llvm-svn: 254088
R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF is not always requires GOT entries. Some relocations can be converted to local ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14713
llvm-svn: 253966
With these relocations, it is now possible to build a simple "hello world"
program for AArch64 Debian.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14917
llvm-svn: 253957
The content of reserved entries of the .got.plt section is target specific.
In particular, on x86_64 the zero entry holds the address of the .dynamic section,
but on AArch64 the same info is stored in the zero entry of the .got section.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14703
llvm-svn: 253239
leaq symbol@tlsld(%rip), %rdi
call __tls_get_addr@plt
symbol@tlsld (R_X86_64_TLSLD) instructs the linker to generate a tls_index entry (two GOT slots) in the GOT for the entire module (shared object or executable) with an offset of 0. The symbol for this GOT entry doesn't matter (as long as it's either local to the module or null), and gold doesn't put a symbol in the dynamic R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 relocation for the GOT entry.
All other platforms defined in http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf except for Itanium use a similar model where global and local dynamic GOT entries take up 2 contiguous GOT slots, so we can handle this in a unified manner if we don't care about Itanium.
While scanning relocations we need to identify local dynamic relocations and generate a single tls_index entry in the GOT for the module and store the address of it somewhere so we can later statically resolve the offset for R_X86_64_TLSLD relocations. We also need to generate a R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 relocation in the RelaDyn relocation section.
This implementation is a bit hacky. It side steps the issue of GotSection and RelocationSection only handling SymbolBody entries by relying on a specific relocation type. The alternative to this seemed to be completely rewriting how GotSection and RelocationSection work, or using a different hacky signaling method.
llvm-svn: 252682
This is cleaner than computing relocations as if we had done it.
While at it, keep a single Phdr variable instead of multiple fields of it.
llvm-svn: 252352
This patch implements R_MIPS_GOT16 relocation for global symbols in order to
generate some entries in GOT. Only reserved and global entries are supported
for now. For the detailed description about GOT in MIPS, see "Global Offset
Table" in Chapter 5 in the followin document:
ftp://www.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/doc/ABI/mipsabi.pdf
In addition, the platform specific symbol "_gp" is added, see "Global Data
Symbols" in Chapter 6 in the aforementioned document.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14211
llvm-svn: 252275
For x86-64 the initial executable TLS block is placed directly before the
thread specific data register so compilers can directly access it via
R_X86_64_TPOFF32. Generate the correct (negative) offset for this case.
llvm-svn: 252131
This does not support TPOFF32 relocations to local symbols as the address calculations are separate. Support for this will be a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 251998
relocateOne is a function to apply a relocation. Previously, that
function took a pointer to Elf_Rel or Elf_Rela in addition to other
information that can be derived from the relocation entry. This patch
simplifies the parameter list. The new parameters, P or SA, are used
in the ELF spec to describe each relocation. These names make
relocateOne look like a mechanical, direct translation of the ELF spec.
llvm-svn: 251090
These classes are partially written, so almost all features
are FIXMEs. We do not want to add new FIXMEs to the classes
when we add new features to other non-stub classes.
llvm-svn: 250947
Target has supportsLazyRelocations() method which can switch lazy relocations on/off (currently all targets are OFF except x64 which is ON). So no any other targets are affected now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13856?id=37726
llvm-svn: 250808
Instead of specifically creating .plt entries for weak undef symbols, mirror
the logic in r250584, and use canBePreempted to determine is a REL24 relocation
needs a .plt entry. This might cause relocateOne to be called for a weak undef
symbol, with a REL24 relocation, but ignore this as a special case (this will
cause SA == 0, which won't happen under any other circumstance).
llvm-svn: 250597
There is sometimes no need to generate relocation via PLT.
Example - when symbol is not undefined and we are not creating shared library. Then we can create relative relocation instead of referencing and creating PLT records.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13835
llvm-svn: 250584
R_PPC64_TOC does not have an associated symbol, but does have a non-zero VA
that target-specific code must compute using some non-trivial rule. We
handled this as a special case in PPC64TargetInfo::relocateOne, where
we knew to write this special address, but that did not work when creating shared
libraries. The special TOC address needs to be the subject of a
R_PPC64_RELATIVE relocation, and so we also need to know how to encode this
special address in the addend of that relocation.
Thus, some target-specific logic is necessary when creating R_PPC64_RELATIVE as
well. To solve this problem, we teach getLocalRelTarget to handle R_PPC64_TOC
as a special case. This allows us to remove the special case in
PPC64TargetInfo::relocateOne (simplifying code there), and naturally allows the
existing logic to do the right thing when creating associated R_PPC64_RELATIVE
relocations for shared libraries.
llvm-svn: 250555
When I initially implemented PPC64TargetInfo::isRelRelative, I included a fixed
set of relative relocations, and made the default false. In retrospect, this
seems unwise in two respects: First, most PPC64 relocations are relative
(either to the base address, the TOC, etc.). Second, most relocation targets
are not appropriate for R_PPC64_RELATIVE (which writes a 64-bit absolute
address). Thus, back off, and include only those relocations for which we test
(or soon will), and are obviously appropriate for R_PPC64_RELATIVE.
llvm-svn: 250540
Unfortunately, the check was not as dead as I had thought, and adjusting the
starting VA again exposed the problem. We end up trying to relocate the bl
(using a 24-bit relative offset) to a symbol address of zero, and in general,
that does not fit.
Thus, reverting for now, and adding a test case.
llvm-svn: 250423
When a relocation points to a SHF_MERGE section, the addend has special meaning.
It should be used to find what in the section the relocation points to. It
should not be added to the output position.
Centralizing it means that the above rule will be implemented once, not once
per target.
llvm-svn: 250421
After some additional post-commit (post-revert) discussion and research, this
reverts, in part, r250205, so the ABI-recommended starting address can be used
on PPC64 (as is done by other linkers).
Also, this addresses the FIXME in ELF/Writer.cpp by making VAStart a
target-dependent property.
llvm-svn: 250378
- Make the `MipsTargetInfo` template class with `ELFType` argument. Use
the argument to select an appropriate relocation type and read/write
routines.
- Add template function `add32` to add-and-write relocation value in
both big and little endian cases. Keep the `add32le` to reduce code
changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13723
llvm-svn: 250297
This has turned out to be unnecessary, and while some ability to set VAStart
will be needed at some point, this is not clearly the right direction.
llvm-svn: 250205
What was done:
1) .got.plt section is created for functions that requires PLT. .got.plt has 3 predefined empty entries now that are required for dynamic linker.
Also other new items created are configured to have correct jump to PLT[N].
2) PLT section now has PLT[0] entry, also others ones are configured to support PLT->GOT(.got.plt) calls.
3) Implemented .rel[a].plt sections (based on patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D13569).
4) Fixed plt relocations types (based on patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D13589).
NOTES:
The .plt.got zero entry is still empty now. According to ELF specification it should hold the address of the dynamic structure, referenced with the symbol
_DYNAMIC. The _DYNAMIC entry points to the .dynamic section which contains information used by the ELF interpreter to setup the binary.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13651
llvm-svn: 250169
Now all Target<Arch> classes are used only in Target.cpp.
We can put them in an anonymous namespace. In order to avoid
merge conflict with other people's patches, I'll do that later.
llvm-svn: 250168
Under PPC64 ELF v1 ABI, the symbols associated with each function name don't
point directly to the code in the .text section (or similar), but rather to a
function descriptor structure in a special data section named .opd. The
elements in the .opd structure include a pointer to the actual code, and a the
relevant TOC base value. Both of these are themselves set by relocations.
When we have a local call, we need the relevant relocation to refer directly to
the target code, not to the function-descriptor in the .opd section. Only when
we have a .plt stub do we care about the address of the .opd function
descriptor itself.
So we make a few changes here:
1. Always write .opd first, so that its relocated data values are available
for later use when writing the text sections. Record a pointer to the .opd
structure, and its corresponding buffer.
2. When processing a relative branch relocation under ppc64, if the
destination points into the .opd section, read the code pointer out of the
function descriptor structure and use that instead.
This this, I can link, and run, a dynamically-compiled "hello world"
application on big-Endian PPC64/Linux (ELF v1 ABI) using lld.
llvm-svn: 250122
Under the PPC64 ELF ABI, functions that might call into other modules (and,
thus, need to load a different TOC base value into %r2), need to restore the
old value after the call. The old value is saved by the .plt code, and the
caller only needs to include a nop instruction after the call, which the linker
will transform into a TOC restore if necessary.
In order to do this the relocation handler needs two things:
1. It needs to know whether the call instruction it is modifying is targeting
a .plt stub that will load a new TOC base value (necessitating a restore after
the call).
2. It needs to know where the buffer ends, so that it does not accidentally
run off the end of the buffer when looking for the 'nop' instruction after the
call.
Given these two pieces of information, we can insert the restore instruction in
place of the following nop when necessary.
llvm-svn: 250110
This is mostly an adaptation of the code in LLVM's
lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RuntimeDyldELF.cpp, and handles a sufficient
number of relocations to link a 'hello world' program on big-Endian PPC64/Linux
(ELF v1 ABI).
llvm-svn: 250101
The required page alignment is different on different targets. On PowerPC, for
example, we need 64K pages (the loader won't set different permissions on a
finer granularity than that). I've set the existing targets to what I believe
to be the correct values, and have updated the regression tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 249760
The size of a .plt entry is different on different targets (it is,
specifically, much larger than 8 on all PPC ABIs). There is no functional
change here (later patches to create .plt entries for PPC64 will depend on this
change).
llvm-svn: 249756
Reapply r249726 (and r249723), hopefully with the correct test fixups this time.
Original commit message:
Address a FIXME in ELF/Writer.cpp: Make VAStart a target-dependent property.
I've set the values for the existing targets to what I believe to be the
correct values, and updated the regression tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 249752
Address a FIXME in ELF/Writer.cpp: Make VAStart a target-dependent property.
I've set the values for the existing targets to what I believe to be the
correct values, and updated the regression tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 249723
This was clearly wrong (thanks Rui for spotting), and I honestly would
like to get this tested so such mistakes won't repeat. Unfortunately, I
wasn't (easily) able to craft a test that exposes the bad behavior.
Ideally, we would like to get tests of this kind for all relocations, but
at the time of writing, this is not true. So, for now just fix this bug
and try to re-evaluate a way to test this in the future.
llvm-svn: 249359
Besides a trivial MIPS support the patch introduces new TargetInfo class
member getDefaultEntry() to override default name of the entry symbol.
MIPS uses __start for that.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13227
llvm-svn: 248779
Unfortunately the i386 and x86_64 relocation have the same numerical value
and it is a probably a bit much to add got support for another architecture
just to test this.
llvm-svn: 248326
This is just enough to get PLT working on 32 bit x86.
The idea behind using a virtual interface is that it should be easy to
convert any of the functions to template parameters if any turns out to be
performance critical.
llvm-svn: 248308
Rafael Espindola