v2: TargetLoweringBase:: -> TargetLowering::
Use Ops array
v3: Explicitly use value 0 for ?DIV
Remove redundant newline
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7803
reviewer: ab
llvm-svn: 238336
Counter symbols created for linkonce functions are not discarded by ELF
linkers unless the symbols are placed in the same comdat section as its
associated function.
llvm-svn: 238335
manager arguments...
I have no idea why, but compilers seem to hate this and its late, so I'm
not going to debug it. :: sigh :: This is why we can't have nice things.
llvm-svn: 238306
when invoking run methods.
This technique was suggested by Dinesh Dwivedi who also wrote the
original patch. During the code review, they explained to me that this
isn't a fully general technique as we need to know the signatures of the
method candidates. Since this is really a narrower utility, I switched
the names and structure to be more clearly a specialized run method
invoke helper and commented it accordingly. I still think this is
a pretty big win.
Very sorry to Dinesh for the extreme delay in landing this patch. I've
been far to busy poking at other things.
Original review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3543
llvm-svn: 238305
This broke the llvm-mips-linux builder and several of our out-of-tree builders.
Initial investigations show that the commit probably isn't the problem but
reverting anyway while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 238302
With this patch the x86 backend is now shrink-wrapping capable
and this functionality can be tested by using the
-enable-shrink-wrap switch.
The next step is to make more test and enable shrink-wrapping by
default for x86.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 238293
- Clean documentation comment
- Change the API to accept an iterator so you can actually pass
MachineBasicBlock::end() now.
- Add more "const".
llvm-svn: 238288
model the dense vector instruction bonuses.
Previously, this code really didn't effectively compute the density of
inlined vector instructions and apply the intended inliner bonus. It
would try to compute it repeatedly while analyzing the function and
didn't handle the case where future vector instructions would tip the
scales back towards the bonus.
Instead, speculatively apply all possible bonuses to the threshold
initially. Once we *know* that a certain bonus can not be applied,
subtract it. This should delay early bailout enough to get much more
consistent results without actually causing us to analyze huge swaths of
code. I expect some (hopefully mild) compile time hit here, and some
swings in performance, but this was definitely the intended behavior of
these bonuses.
This also dramatically simplifies the computation of the bonuses to not
interact with each other in confusing ways. The previous code didn't do
a good job of this and the values for bonuses may be surprising but are
at least now clearly written in the code.
Finally, fix code to be in line with comments and use zero as the
bailout condition.
Patch by Easwaran Raman, with some comment tweaks by me to try and
further clarify what is going on with this code.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8267
llvm-svn: 238276
Long ago, the poll insertion code assumed that the insertion site was a terminator. As a result, the entry selection code would split a basic block to ensure it could pass a terminator. The insertion code was updated quite a while ago - possibly before it ever landed upstream - but the now redundant work was never removed.
While I'm at it, remove a comment which doesn't apply to the upstreamed code.
NFC intended.
llvm-svn: 238254
While working on another change, I noticed that the naming in this function was mildly deceptive. While fixing that, I took the oppurtunity to modernize some of the code. NFC intended.
llvm-svn: 238252
remove ExecutionEngine's dependence on CodeGen. NFC.
This is a follow-up to r238080.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9830
llvm-svn: 238244
This gets gas and llc -filetype=obj to agree on the order of prefixes.
For llvm-mc we need to fix the asm parser to know that it makes a difference
on which line the "lock" is in.
Part of pr23594.
llvm-svn: 238232
v2: Use C++ comments and end with periods
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 238228
Jan Vesely