The previous logic was to first try without relocations at all
and failing that stop on the first defined symbol.
That was inefficient and incorrect in the case part of the
expression could be simplified and another part could not
(see included test).
We now stop the evaluation when we get to a variable whose value
can change (i.e. is weak).
llvm-svn: 233187
This ensures that we're building and testing the CompileOnDemand layer, at least
in a basic way.
Currently x86-64 only, and with limited to no library calls enabled (depending
on host platform). Patches welcome. ;)
To enable access to the lazy JIT, this patch replaces the '-use-orcmcjit' lli
option with a new option:
'-jit-kind={ mcjit | orc-mcjit | orc-lazy }'.
All regression tests are updated to use the new option, and one trivial test of
the new lazy JIT is added.
llvm-svn: 233182
In r233009 we gained specific check-llvm-* build targets for invoking
specific parts of the test suite, but they were copying the
dependencies for check-all, rather than just listing the dependencies
for check-llvm.
This moves the creation of these targets next to the check-llvm
target, and uses that target's configuration rather than the check-all
config.
llvm-svn: 233174
At least one Linux bot [1] doesn't like my dwarfdump checks, so I've
disable those until I can investigate what's going on there. I'll
continue to track this in PR22792.
[1]: http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/cmake-llvm-x86_64-linux/builds/22863
llvm-svn: 233165
Instead of dropping subprograms that have been overridden, just set
their function pointers to `nullptr`. This is a minor adjustment to the
stop-gap fix for PR21910 committed in r224487, and fixes the crasher
from PR22792.
The problem that r224487 put a band-aid on: how do we find the canonical
subprogram for a `Function`? Since the backend currently relies on
`DebugInfoFinder` (which does a naive in-order traversal of compile
units and picks the first subprogram) for this, r224487 tried dropping
non-canonical subprograms.
Dropping subprograms fails because the backend *also* builds up a map
from subprogram to compile unit (`DwarfDebug::SPMap`) based on the
subprogram lists. A missing subprogram causes segfaults later when an
inlined reference (such as in this testcase) is created.
Instead, just drop the `Function` pointer to `nullptr`, which nicely
mirrors what happens when an already-inlined `Function` is optimized
out. We can't really be sure that it's the same definition anyway, as
the testcase demonstrates.
This still isn't completely satisfactory. Two flaws at least that I can
think of:
- I still haven't found a straightforward way to make this symmetric
in the IR. (Interestingly, the DWARF output is already symmetric,
and I've tested for that to be sure we don't regress.)
- Using `DebugInfoFinder` to find the canonical subprogram for a
function is kind of crazy. We should just attach metadata to the
function, like this:
define weak i32 @foo(i32, i32) !dbg !MDSubprogram(...) {
llvm-svn: 233164
Reverts the code change from r221168 and the relevant test.
It was a mistake to disable the combiner, and based on the ultimate
definition of 'optnone' we shouldn't have considered the test case
as failing in the first place.
llvm-svn: 233153
A load from an invariant location is assumed to not alias any otherwise potentially aliasing stores. Our implementation only applied this rule to store instructions themselves whereas they it should apply for any memory accessing instruction. This results in both FRE and PRE becoming more effective at eliminating invariant loads.
Note that as a follow on change I will likely move this into AliasAnalysis itself. That's where the TBAA constant flag is handled and the semantics are essentially the same. I'd like to separate the semantic change from the refactoring and thus have extended the hack that's already in MemoryDependenceAnalysis for this change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8591
llvm-svn: 233140
In a subtraction of the form A - B, if B is weak, there is no way to represent
that on ELF since all relocations add the value of a symbol.
llvm-svn: 233139
We can't use TargetFrameLowering::getFrameIndexOffset directly, because
Win64 really wants the offset from the stack pointer at the end of the
prologue. Instead, use X86FrameLowering::getFrameIndexOffsetFromSP(),
which is a pretty close approximiation of that. It fails to handle cases
with interestingly large stack alignments, which is pretty uncommon on
Win64 and is TODO.
llvm-svn: 233137
A while ago llvm-cov gained support for clang's instrumentation based
profiling in addition to its gcov support, and subcommands were added
to choose which behaviour to use. When no subcommand was specified, we
fell back to gcov compatibility with a warning that a subcommand would
be required in the future. Now, we require the subcommand.
Note that if the basename of llvm-cov is gcov (via symlink or
hardlink, for example), we still use the gcov compatible behaviour
with no subcommand required.
llvm-svn: 233132
The changes to InstCombine (& SCEV) do seem a bit silly - it doesn't make
anything obviously better to have the caller access the pointers element
type (the thing I'm trying to remove) than the GEP itself, but it's a
helpful migration step. This will allow me to more obviously lock down
GEP (& Load, etc) API usage, then fix all the code that accesses pointer
element types except the places that need to be removed (most of the
InstCombines) anyway - at which point I'll need to just remove all that
code because it won't be meaningful anymore (there will be no pointer
types, so no bitcasts to combine)
SCEV looks like it'll need some restructuring - we'll have to do a bit
more work for GEP canonicalization, since it'll depend on how it's used
if we can even manage to canonicalize it to a non-ugly GEP. I guess we
can do some fun stuff like voting (do 2 out of 3 load from the GEP with
a certain type that gives a pretty GEP? Does every typed use of the GEP
use either a specific type or a generic type (i8*, etc)?)
llvm-svn: 233131
It seems one windows bot fails since I added ilne table linking to
llvm-dsymutil (see r232333 commit thread).
Disable the affected tests until I can figure out what's happening.
llvm-svn: 233130
The changes to InstCombine do seem a bit silly - it doesn't make
anything obviously better to have the caller access the pointers element
type (the thing I'm trying to remove) than the GEP itself, but it's a
helpful migration step. This will allow me to more obviously lock down
GEP (& Load, etc) API usage, then fix all the code that accesses pointer
element types except the places that need to be removed (most of the
InstCombines) anyway - at which point I'll need to just remove all that
code because it won't be meaningful anymore (there will be no pointer
types, so no bitcasts to combine)
llvm-svn: 233126
This patch tries to merge duplicate landing pads when they branch to a common shared target.
Given IR that looks like this:
lpad1:
%exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
cleanup
br label %shared_resume
lpad2:
%exn2 = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
cleanup
br label %shared_resume
shared_resume:
call void @fn()
ret void
}
We can rewrite the users of both landing pad blocks to use one of them. This will generally allow the shared_resume block to be merged with the common landing pad as well.
Without this change, tail duplication would likely kick in - creating N (2 in this case) copies of the shared_resume basic block.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8297
llvm-svn: 233125
This code depended on a bug in the FindAssociatedSection function that would
cause it to return the wrong result for certain absolute expressions. Instead,
use EvaluateAsRelocatable.
llvm-svn: 233119
Assert that this doesn't fire - I'll remove all of this later, but just
leaving it in for a while in case this is firing & we just don't have
test coverage.
llvm-svn: 233116
This is the IR optimizer follow-on patch for D8563: the x86 backend patch
that converts this kind of shuffle back into a vperm2.
This is also a continuation of the transform that started in D8486.
In that patch, Andrea suggested that we could convert vperm2 intrinsics that
use zero masks into a single shuffle.
This is an implementation of that suggestion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8567
llvm-svn: 233110
This caused PR23008, compiles failing with: "Use still stuck around after Def is
destroyed: %.sroa.speculated"
Also reverting follow-up r233064.
llvm-svn: 233105
IRCE requires the induction variables it handles to not sign-overflow.
The current scheme of checking if sext({X,+,S}) == {sext(X),+,sext(S)}
fails when SCEV simplifies sext(X) too. After this change we //also//
check no-signed-wrap by looking at the flags set on the SCEVAddRecExpr.
llvm-svn: 233102
vperm2x128 instructions have the special ability (aka free hardware capability)
to shuffle zero values into a vector.
This patch recognizes that type of shuffle and generates the appropriate
control byte.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22984
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8563
llvm-svn: 233100
Move definition of `MDLocation` after `MDLocalScope` so that the latter
is available for casts in the former. Similarly, move the definition of
`MDFile` as early as possible so that other classes can cast to it in
their definitions. (Follow-up commits will take advantage of this.)
llvm-svn: 233096
The main verifier already recurses through the other entry points, so we
might as well descend here too.
This temporarily duplicates some work already done in
`verifyDebugInfo()`, but eventually I'll be removing the other side.
llvm-svn: 233095
Add a subclass of `MDScope` to explicitly categorize the legal scopes
for locals -- in particular, scopes that are legal for `MDLocation`,
`MDLexicalBlockBase`, and `MDLocalVariable`. This provides a convenient
`isa<>` target for the verifier, and eventually I'll be changing the
above classes' `getScope()` to specifically return it. Currently, its
subclasses are `MDSubprogram`, `MDLexicalBlock`, and
`MDLexicalBlockFile`.
I've gone with `MDLocalScope` for now -- a little ambiguous since it's a
scope *for* locals, not a scope that's local -- but I'm open to more
descriptive names if someone can think of something better. Regardless,
the code docs should make it clear enough.
llvm-svn: 233092
Simplify boolean expressions using `true` and `false` with `clang-tidy`
Patch by Richard Thomson.
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8528
llvm-svn: 233091
Simplify boolean expressions using `true` and `false` with `clang-tidy`
Patch by Richard Thomson.
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8525
llvm-svn: 233089
Benjamin Kramer