it with memcpy. This also fixes a problem on big-endian hosts, where
addUnaligned would return different results depending on the alignment
of the data.
llvm-svn: 151247
chip in r139383, and the PSP components of the triple are really
annoying to parse. Let's leave this chapter behind. There is no reason
to expect LLVM to see a PSP-related triple these days, and so no
reasonable motivation to support them.
It might be reasonable to prune a few of the older MIPS triple forms in
general, but as those at least cause no burden on parsing (they aren't
both a chip and an OS!), I'm happy to leave them in for now.
llvm-svn: 151156
They're private static methods but we can just make them static
functions in the implementation. It makes the implementations a touch
more wordy, but takes another chunk out of the header file.
Also, take the opportunity to switch the names to the new coding
conventions.
No functionality changed here.
llvm-svn: 151047
construction. Simplify its interface, implementation, and users
accordingly as there is no longer an 'uninitialized' state to check for.
Also, fixes a bug lurking in the interface as there was one method that
didn't correctly check for initialization.
llvm-svn: 151024
Accomplished by moving the body of StringRef::edit_distance into
a separate function that accepts two ArrayRefs, and making
StringRef::edit_distance a wrapper around the new function.
llvm-svn: 150621
Unify default construction of error_code uses on this idiom so that users don't
feel compelled to make static globals for naming convenience. (unfortunately I
couldn't make the original ctor private as some APIs don't return their result,
instead using an out parameter (that makes sense to default construct) - which
is a bit of a pity. I did, however, find/fix some cases of unnecessary default
construction of error_code before I hit the unfixable cases)
llvm-svn: 150197
If someone would prefer a clear name for the 'success' error_value we could
come up with one - potentially just a 'named constructor' style
'error_value::success()' to make this expression more self-documenting. If
I see this come up in other cases I'll certainly consider it.
One step along the way to resolving PR11944.
llvm-svn: 150120
This CL delays reading of function bodies from initial parse until
materialization, allowing overlap of compilation with bitcode download.
llvm-svn: 149918
(This time I believe I've checked all the -Wreturn-type warnings from GCC & added the couple of llvm_unreachables necessary to silence them. If I've missed any, I'll happily fix them as soon as I know about them)
llvm-svn: 148262
or Clang is using this, and it would be hard to use it correctly given
the thread hostility of the function. Also, it never checked the return
which is rather dangerous with chdir. If someone was in fact using this,
please let me know, as well as what the usecase actually is so that
I can add it back and make it more correct and secure to use. (That
said, it's never going to be "safe" per-se, but we could at least
document the risks...)
llvm-svn: 148211
of several newly un-defaulted switches. This also helps optimizers
(including LLVM's) recognize that every case is covered, and we should
assume as much.
llvm-svn: 147861
Ahmed Charles