* Generalize the code added in D70637 and D70937. We should eventually remove the EM_MIPS special case.
* Handle R_PPC_LOCAL24PC the same way as R_PPC_REL24.
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73424
-fno-pie produces a pair of non-GOT-non-PLT relocations R_PPC_ADDR16_{HA,LO} (R_ABS) referencing external
functions.
```
lis 3, func@ha
la 3, func@l(3)
```
In a -no-pie/-pie link, if func is not defined in the executable, a canonical PLT entry (st_value>0, st_shndx=0) will be needed.
References to func in shared objects will be resolved to this address.
-fno-pie -pie should fail with "can't create dynamic relocation ... against ...", so we just need to think about -no-pie.
On x86, the PLT entry passes the JMP_SLOT offset to the rtld PLT resolver.
On x86-64: the PLT entry passes the JUMP_SLOT index to the rtld PLT resolver.
On ARM/AArch64: the PLT entry passes &.got.plt[n]. The PLT header passes &.got.plt[fixed-index]. The rtld PLT resolver can compute the JUMP_SLOT index from the two addresses.
For these targets, the canonical PLT entry can just reuse the regular PLT entry (in PltSection).
On PPC32: PltSection (.glink) consists of `b PLTresolve` instructions and `PLTresolve`. The rtld PLT resolver depends on r11 having been set up to the .plt (GotPltSection) entry.
On PPC64 ELFv2: PltSection (.glink) consists of `__glink_PLTresolve` and `bl __glink_PLTresolve`. The rtld PLT resolver depends on r12 having been set up to the .plt (GotPltSection) entry.
We cannot reuse a `b PLTresolve`/`bl __glink_PLTresolve` in PltSection as a canonical PLT entry. PPC64 ELFv2 avoids the problem by using TOC for any external reference, even in non-pic code, so the canonical PLT entry scenario should not happen in the first place.
For PPC32, we have to create a PLT call stub as the canonical PLT entry. The code sequence sets up r11.
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73399
Symbol information can be used to improve out-of-range/misalignment diagnostics.
It also helps R_ARM_CALL/R_ARM_THM_CALL which has different behaviors with different symbol types.
There are many (67) relocateOne() call sites used in thunks, {Arm,AArch64}errata, PLT, etc.
Rename them to `relocateNoSym()` to be clearer that there is no symbol information.
Reviewed By: grimar, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73254
These functions call relocateOne(). This patch is a prerequisite for
making relocateOne() aware of `Symbol` (D73254).
Reviewed By: grimar, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73250
Similar to D71509 (EM_PPC64), on EM_PPC, the IPLT code sequence should
be similar to a PLT call stub. Unlike EM_PPC64, EM_PPC -msecure-plt has
small/large PIC model differences.
* -fpic/-fpie: R_PPC_PLTREL24 r_addend=0. The call stub loads an address relative to `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_`.
* -fPIC/-fPIE: R_PPC_PLTREL24 r_addend=0x8000. (A partial linked object
file may have an addend larger than 0x8000.) The call stub loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000.
Just assume large PIC model for now. This patch makes:
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -msecure-plt -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -msecure-plt -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc. -fpie will crash because the compiler and the
linker do not agree on the value which r30 stores (_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
vs .got2+0x8000).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71621
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
This change only affects EM_386. relOff can be computed from `index`
easily, so it is unnecessarily passed as a parameter.
Both in.plt and in.iplt entries are written by writePLT. For in.iplt,
the instruction `push reloc_offset` will change because `index` is now
different. Fortunately, this does not matter because `push; jmp` is only
used by PLT. IPLT does not need the code sequence.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71518
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
Summary:
Our rule to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types were
loose. D63121 made it stricter but it failed to create R_*_RELATIVE for
R_ARM_TARGET1 and R_PPC64_TOC. rLLD363236 worked around that by
reinstating the original behavior for ARM and PPC64.
This patch is an attempt to simplify the logic.
Note, in ld.bfd, R_ARM_TARGET2 --target2=abs also creates
R_ARM_RELATIVE. This seems a very uncommon scenario (moreover,
--target2=got-rel is the default), so I do not implement any logic
related to it.
Also, delete R_AARCH64_ABS32 from AArch64::getDynRel. We don't have
working ILP32 support yet. Allowing it would create an incorrect
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE.
For MIPS, the (if SymbolRel, then RelativeRel) code is to keep its
behavior unchanged.
Note, in ppc64-abs64-dyn.s, R_PPC64_TOC gets an incorrect addend because
computeAddend() doesn't compute the correct address. We seem to have the
wrong behavior for a long time. The important thing seems that a dynamic
relocation R_PPC64_TOC should not be created as the dynamic loader will
error R_PPC64_TOC is not supported.
Reviewers: atanasyan, grimar, peter.smith, ruiu, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63383
llvm-svn: 363928
This reverts commit r363060 and restores r362867.
r362867 is innocent. The ppc64le-lld-multistage-test bot failure was due to a clang/gcc .toc bug:
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .rodata._ZNK4llvm3MVT13getSizeInBitsEv
>>> defined in utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o
>>> referenced by CodeGenRegisters.cpp
>>> utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0)
It will be worked around by D63182.
llvm-svn: 363124
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.
When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.
ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This patch:
a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).
As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.
Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121
llvm-svn: 363059
I've change the variable names used in PPC64.cpp from "Instr" to "Insn"
because "Insn" is a more common abbreviation for "instruction".
While changing PPC64.cpp relocateOne(), make R_PPC64_ADDR16_LO{_DS}
slightly more efficient by saving a read and a write for the TocOptimize
case.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63043
llvm-svn: 362867
We create several types of synthetic sections for loadable partitions, including:
- The dynamic symbol table. This allows code outside of the loadable partitions
to find entry points with dlsym.
- Creating a dynamic symbol table also requires the creation of several other
synthetic sections for the partition, such as the dynamic table and hash table
sections.
- The partition's ELF header is represented as a synthetic section in the
combined output file, and will be used by llvm-objcopy to extract partitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62350
llvm-svn: 362819
Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl
should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate
their lib32 (PR40888).
* Fix default image base and max page size.
* Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not
implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't
support Secure PLT yet.
* Support more initial relocation types:
R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16.
The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type
but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA.
* Support GNU ifunc
* Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc
* Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub.
It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24.
A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to
.got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative
addresses).
Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub
can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility,
change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to
`const InputSection &, const Relocation &`.
PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both
writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments,
which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable.
This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to
address the security issue.
TLS will be implemented in D62940.
glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can
not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack
(not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to
work around the issue:
if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) {
// Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt
Add(In.RelaDyn);
if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent)
In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt);
}
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464
llvm-svn: 362721
This is a minor improvement inspired by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38303.
A person reported that he observed message complaining about unsupported R_ARM_V4BX:
error: can't create dynamic relocation R_ARM_V4BX against local symbol in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC
But with -z notext he only saw a relocation number, what is not convenient:
error: ../../gfx/cairo/libpixman/src/pixman-arm-neon-asm-bilinear.o:(.text+0x4F0): unrecognized reloc 40
Also, in the error messages we use relocation but not reloc.
With this patch we start to print one of the following messages:
error: file.o: unrecognized relocation Unknown(999)
error: file.o: unrecognized relocation R_X_KNOWN_BY_LLVM_BUT_UNSUPPORTED_BY_LLD_NAME
There is no way to write a test for that I believe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62237
llvm-svn: 361472
This change itself doesn't mean anything, but it helps D59780 because
in patch, we don't know whether we need to create a CET-aware PLT or
not until we read all input files.
llvm-svn: 357194
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
When linking the linux kernel on ppc64 and ppc
ld.lld: error: unrecognized reloc 11
11 is PPC_REL14 and PPC64_REL14
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54868
llvm-svn: 348255
This is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=38919.
Currently, LLD may report "unsupported relocation target while parsing debug info"
when parsing the debug information.
At the same time LLD does that for zeroed R_X86_64_NONE relocations,
which obviously has "invalid" targets.
The nature of R_*_NONE relocation assumes them should be ignored.
This patch teaches LLD to stop reporting the debug information parsing errors for them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52408
llvm-svn: 343078
This is the same as 327248 except Arm defining _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to
be the base of the .got section as some existing code is relying upon it.
For most Targets the _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol is expected to be at
the start of the .got.plt section so that _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0] =
reserved value that is by convention the address of the dynamic section.
Previously we had defined _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ as either the start or end
of the .got section with the intention that the .got.plt section would
follow the .got. However this does not always hold with the current
default section ordering so _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0] may not be consistent
with the reserved first entry of the .got.plt.
X86, X86_64 and AArch64 will use the .got.plt. Arm, Mips and Power use .got
Fixes PR36555
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44259
llvm-svn: 327823
This change broke ARM code that expects to be able to add
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to the result of an R_ARM_REL32.
I will provide a reproducer on llvm-commits.
llvm-svn: 327688
the start of the .got.plt section so that _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0] =
reserved value that is by convention the address of the dynamic section.
Previously we had defined _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ as either the start or end
of the .got section with the intention that the .got.plt section would
follow the .got. However this does not always hold with the current
default section ordering so _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0] may not be consistent
with the reserved first entry of the .got.plt.
X86, X86_64, Arm and AArch64 will use the .got.plt. Mips and Power use .got
Fixes PR36555
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44259
llvm-svn: 327248
The PPC port doesn't support PLT yet, but the architecture independent
code optimizes PLT access for non preemptible symbols, which is
exactly what returning R_PC was trying to implement.
llvm-svn: 320430
Now that we have only SymbolBody as the symbol class. So, "SymbolBody"
is a bit strange name now. This is a mechanical change generated by
perl -i -pe s/SymbolBody/Symbol/g $(git grep -l SymbolBody lld/ELF lld/COFF)
nd clang-format-diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39459
llvm-svn: 317370
Summary:
The COFF linker and the ELF linker have long had similar but separate
Error.h and Error.cpp files to implement error handling. This change
introduces new error handling code in Common/ErrorHandler.h, changes the
COFF and ELF linkers to use it, and removes the old, separate
implementations.
Reviewers: ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: smeenai, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, javed.absar, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39259
llvm-svn: 316624
The support of R_PPC_ADDR16_HI improves ld compatibility and makes
things on par with RuntimeDyldELF that already implements this
relocation.
Patch by vit9696.
llvm-svn: 316306
A section was passed to getRelExpr just to create an error message.
But if there's an invalid relocation, we would eventually report it
in relocateOne. So we don't have to pass a section to getRelExpr.
llvm-svn: 315552
We were using uint32_t as the type of relocation kind. It has a
readability issue because what Type really means in `uint32_t Type`
is not obvious. It could be a section type, a symbol type or a
relocation type.
Since we do not do any arithemetic operations on relocation types
(e.g. adding one to R_X86_64_PC32 doesn't make sense), it would be
more natural if they are represented as enums. Unfortunately, that
is not doable because relocation type definitions are spread into
multiple header files.
So I decided to use typedef. This still should be better than the
plain uint32_t because the intended type is now obvious.
llvm-svn: 315525
On many architectures gcc and clang will recognize _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - .
and produce a relocation that can be processed without needing to know the
value of _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. This is not always the case; for example ARM
gcc produces R_ARM_BASE_PREL but clang produces the more general
R_ARM_REL32 to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. To evaluate this relocation
correctly _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ must be defined to be the either the base of
the GOT or end of the GOT dependent on architecture..
If/when llvm-mc is changed to recognize _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - . this
change will not be necessary for new objects. However there may still be
old objects and versions of clang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34355
llvm-svn: 306282
Target.cpp contains code for all the targets that LLD supports. It was
simple and easy, but as the number of supported targets increased,
it got messy.
This patch splits the file into per-target files under ELF/arch directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34222
llvm-svn: 305565
Fangrui Song