Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
This is a fix for disassembling unusual instruction sequences in 64-bit
mode w.r.t the CALL rel16 instruction. It might be desirable to move the
check somewhere else, but it essentially mimics the special case
handling with JCXZ in 16-bit mode.
The current behavior accepts the opcode size prefix and causes the
call's immediate to stop disassembling after 2 bytes. When debugging
sequences of instructions with this pattern, the disassembler output
becomes extremely unreliable and essentially useless (if you jump midway
into what lldb thinks is a unified instruction, you'll lose %rip). So we
ignore the prefix and consume all 4 bytes when disassembling a 64-bit
mode binary.
Note: in Vol. 2A 3-99 the Intel spec states that CALL rel16 is N.S. N.S.
is defined as:
Indicates an instruction syntax that requires an address override
prefix in 64-bit mode and is not supported. Using an address
override prefix in 64-bit mode may result in model-specific
execution behavior. (Vol. 2A 3-7)
Since 0x66 is an operand override prefix we should be OK (although we
may want to warn about 0x67 prefixes to 0xe8). On the CPUs I tested
with, they all ignore the 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode.
Patch by Matthew Barney!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9573
llvm-svn: 246038
- Deciding that insn->sibIndex is SIB_INDEX_NONE does not require another
check beyond the fully decoded bits being equal to 0x4.
The expression insn->sibIndex == SIB_INDEX_sib could not have been true unless
index were 0x4, because SIB_INDEX_sib is merely the range base (SIB_INDEX_EAX)
plus 4. Respectively SIB_INDEX_sib64.
- Don't use a switch statement to perform left-shift.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9762
llvm-svn: 240598
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
This reverts commit r233055.
It still causes buildbot failures (gcc running out of memory on several platforms, and a self-host failure on arm), although less than the previous time.
llvm-svn: 233068
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first time this was committed (r229831), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8542
llvm-svn: 233055
Simplify boolean expressions with `true` and `false` with `clang-tidy`
Patch by Richard Thomson.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8519
llvm-svn: 233002
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
With this patch MCDisassembler::getInstruction takes an ArrayRef<uint8_t>
instead of a MemoryObject.
Even on X86 there is a maximum size an instruction can have. Given
that, it seems way simpler and more efficient to just pass an ArrayRef
to the disassembler instead of a MemoryObject and have it do a virtual
call every time it wants some extra bytes.
llvm-svn: 221751
This fixes a few cases of:
* Wrong variable name style.
* Lines longer than 80 columns.
* Repeated names in comments.
* clang-format of the above.
This make the next patch a lot easier to read.
llvm-svn: 221615
Unfortunately, this isn't easy to fix since there's no simple way to figure out from the disassembler tables whether the W-bit is being used to select a 64-bit GPR or if its a required part of the opcode. The fix implemented here just looks for "64" in the instruction name and ignores the W-bit in 32-bit mode if its present.
Fixes PR21169.
llvm-svn: 219194
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
This controls the number of operands in the disassembler's x86OperandSets
table. The entries describe how the operand is encoded and its type.
Not to surprisingly 5 operands is insufficient for AVX512. Consider
VALIGNDrrik in the next patch. These are its operand specifiers:
{ /* 328 */
{ ENCODING_DUP, TYPE_DUP1 },
{ ENCODING_REG, TYPE_XMM512 },
{ ENCODING_WRITEMASK, TYPE_VK8 },
{ ENCODING_VVVV, TYPE_XMM512 },
{ ENCODING_RM_CD64, TYPE_XMM512 },
{ ENCODING_IB, TYPE_IMM8 },
},
llvm-svn: 214889
Craig Topper