Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
Even g++ considers this a valid C++ identifier and it should only have been
visible in C mode.
Also drop the associated low-value diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 197995
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
Type trait parsing is all over the place at the moment with unary, binary and
n-ary C++11 type traits that were developed independently at different points
in clang's history.
There's no good reason to handle them separately -- there are three parsers,
three AST nodes and lots of duplicated handling code with slightly different
implementations and diags for each kind.
This commit unifies parsing of type traits and sets the stage for further
consolidation.
No change in behaviour other than more consistent error recovery.
llvm-svn: 197179
Employed the following refactorings:
- Renamed some functions
- Introduced explaining variables
- Cleaned up & added comments
- Used Optional<unsigned> for return value instead of an out parameter
- Added assertions
- Constified a few member functions
No functionality change.
All regressions pass.
llvm-svn: 196662
__builtin_types_compatible_p() isn't a C++ type trait at all, rather a GNU C
special-case, so it's fine to use BoolTy the default return type for binary
type traits.
This brings BTT in line with other arities that already default to BoolTy.
Cleanup only, no change in behaviour.
llvm-svn: 196646
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
nested-name-specifier, rather than crashing. (In fact, reject all
literal-operator-ids that have a non-namespace nested-name-specifier). The
grammar doesn't allow these in some cases, and in other cases does allow them
but instantiation will always fail.
llvm-svn: 196443
See http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-November/033369.html for discussion on cfe-dev.
This fix explicitly checks whether we are within the declcontext of a lambda's call operator - which is what I had intended to be true (and assumed would be true if getCurLambda returns a valid pointer) before checking whether a lambda can capture the potential-captures of the innermost lambda.
A deeper fix (that addresses why getCurLambda() returns a valid pointer when perhaps it shouldn't?) - as proposed by Richard Smith in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17877 - has been suggested as a FIXME.
Patch was LGTM'd by Richard (just barely :)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2144
llvm-svn: 194448
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.
Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).
llvm-svn: 193969
Summary: Some MS headers use these features.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1948
llvm-svn: 192936
This is a fix to PR12778: in erroneous code an allocation function
can be declared with no arguments, quering the first argument in this case
causes assertion violation.
llvm-svn: 190751
Summary:
__uuidof on templated types should exmaine if any of its template
parameters have a uuid declspec. If exactly one does, then take it.
Otherwise, issue an appropriate error.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1419
llvm-svn: 190240
In addition to storing more useful information in the AST, this
fixes a semantic check in template instantiation which checks whether
the l-paren location is valid.
Fixes PR16903.
llvm-svn: 188495
global allocation or deallocation function, that should not cause that global
allocation or deallocation function to become unavailable.
llvm-svn: 186270
clang would incorrectly not allow the following:
int x = true ? (throw 1) : 2;
The problem exists because we don't see beyond the parens.
This, in turn, causes us to believe that we are choosing between void
and int which we diagnose as an error.
Instead, allow clang to see the 'throw' inside the parens.
llvm-svn: 183085
* Treat _Atomic(T) as a literal type if T is a literal type.
* Evaluate expressions of this type properly.
* Fix a lurking bug where we built completely bogus ASTs for converting to
_Atomic types in C++ in some cases, caught by the tests for this change.
llvm-svn: 182541
common function. The C++1y contextual implicit conversion rules themselves are
not yet implemented, however.
This also fixes a subtle bug where template instantiation context notes were
dropped for diagnostics coming from conversions for integral constant
expressions -- we were implicitly slicing a SemaDiagnosticBuilder into a
DiagnosticBuilder when producing these diagnostics, and losing their context
notes in the process.
llvm-svn: 182406
Aaron Ballman