all missed!
Thanks to Alex Bradbury for pointing this out, and the fact that I never
added the intended `legacy` anchor to the developer policy. Add that
anchor too. With hope, this will cause the links to all resolve
successfully.
llvm-svn: 351731
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
Summary:
Recent Clangs give an error for this. Note that the size of this diff is
caused by running clang-format on the result of removing the captures.
I guess we'll see how well that works for us.
Reviewers: jfb, rodgert
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55945
llvm-svn: 350544
Summary:
This commit adds a check-pstl CMake target that will run the tests
we currently have for pstl. Those tests are not using LLVM lit yet,
but switching them over should be a transparent change. With this
change, we can start relying on the `check-pstl` target for workflows
and CI.
Note that this commit purposefully does not support the pre-monorepo
layout (with subprojects in projects/), since LLVM is moving towards
the monorepo layout anyway.
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, mclow.lists, rodgert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55963
llvm-svn: 349919
The initial commit of the Parallel STL upstream (under LLVM umbrella) based on
Parallel STL 20181204 open source release, which is available by
https://github.com/intel/parallelstl
Author: Mikhail Dvorskiy <mikhail.dvorskiy@intel.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55889
llvm-svn: 349653
Chandler Carruth