Summary:
This adds semantic selection to the LSP Server.
Adds support for serialization of input request and the output reply.
Also adds regression tests for the feature.
Currently we do not support multi cursor.The LSP Server only accepts single position in the request as opposed to many position in the spec.
Spec:
https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/blob/dbaeumer/3.15/specification.md#textDocument_selectionRange
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67720
llvm-svn: 372753
Summary:
First patch for propogating multifile changes from tweak outputs to LSP
WorkspaceEdits.
Uses SM to convert tooling::Replacements to TextEdits.
Errors out if there are any inconsistencies between the draft version and the
version generated the edits.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66637
llvm-svn: 371392
Summary:
The latter simplifies the client code by avoiding the need to handle it
as a separate case statement.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: nridge, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67277
llvm-svn: 371375
Summary: This would make the client life (tracking the changes) easier.
Reviewers: jvikstrom
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66541
llvm-svn: 369884
Summary:
This would make client know which codeActionKinds that clangd may
return.
VSCode will add a new entry "Refactor..." (which shows all
refactoring-kind code actions) in the right-click menu.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66592
llvm-svn: 369656
Summary:
By inlining a complicated lambda into its single call-site.
Also ensure we call Reply() exactly once even if tweaks return both
ShowMessage and ApplyEdit effects.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66343
llvm-svn: 369100
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Summary:
The callback will be invoked in clangd when we receive a reply from the client.
This is a prerequisite of implementing a generic mechanism for chainable
refactorings (e.g. extract variable and rename), this would allow server to
trigger a new request to the LSP client after receiving a reply from the client.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65387
llvm-svn: 367845
Summary: Added a class for diffing highlightings and removing duplicate lines. Integrated into the highlighting generation flow. Only works correctly if all tokens are on a single line. Also returns empty lines if the IDE should remove previous highlightings on a line.
Reviewers: hokein, sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64475
llvm-svn: 367521
Summary:
This allows the client to resolve subtypes one level at a time.
For supertypes, this is not necessary, because we eagerly compute
supertypes and return all levels.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
llvm-svn: 365986
Summary:
This allows the client to resolve subtypes one level at a time.
For supertypes, this is not necessary, because we eagerly compute
supertypes and return all levels.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
llvm-svn: 365867
Summary:
This would allow clangd embedders to use the ClangdServer::rename for other
purposes (highlighting all the occurrences of the symbol in prepare
stage).
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64481
llvm-svn: 365631
Summary:
I didn't manage to find something nicer than optional<bool>, but at least I
found a sneakier comment.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64216
llvm-svn: 365356
Summary:
Some custom toolchains come with their own header files and compiler
drivers. Those compiler drivers implicitly know about include search path for
those headers. This patch aims to extract that information from drivers and add
it to the command line when invoking clang frontend.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62804
llvm-svn: 364389
Summary:
This introduces a few new concepts:
- tweaks have an Intent (they don't all advertise as refactorings)
- tweaks may produce messages (for ShowMessage notification). Generalized
Replacements -> Effect.
- tweaks (and other features) may be hidden (clangd -hidden-features flag).
We may choose to promote these one day. I'm not sure they're worth their own
feature flags though.
Verified it in vim-clangd (not yet open source), curious if the UI is ok in VSCode.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62538
llvm-svn: 363680
Summary:
Instead of `tooling::Replacements`. So that embedders do not need to store
the contents of the file.
This also aligns better with `ClangdServer::rename`.
Reviewers: kadircet, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63140
llvm-svn: 363150
Summary:
The existing implementation (which triggers on }) is fairly simple and
has flaws:
- doesn't trigger frequently/regularly enough (particularly in editors that type the }
for you)
- often reformats too much code around the edit
- has jarring cases that I don't have clear ideas for fixing
This implementation is designed to trigger on newline, which feels to me more
intuitive than } or ;.
It does have allow for reformatting after other characters - it has a
basic behavior and a model for adding specialized behavior for
particular characters. But at least initially I'd stick to advertising
\n in the capabilities.
This also handles comment splitting: when you insert a line break inside
a line comment, it will make the new line into an aligned line comment.
Working on tests, but want people to patch it in and try it - it's hard to
see if "feel" is right purely by looking at a test.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60605
llvm-svn: 362939
Summary:
We currently return an error, this causes `coc.nvim` and VSCode to
show an error message in the logs.
Returning empty list of completions allows to avod the error message
without altering other user-visible behavior.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62999
llvm-svn: 362811
Summary:
Change ClangdServer layer to output a structured response for Hover,
which can be rendered by client according to their needs.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61497
llvm-svn: 361803
Summary: We already have the structure internally, we just need to expose it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60267
llvm-svn: 358675
Summary:
Instead of tooling::Replacement. To avoid the need to have contents of
the file at the caller site. This also aligns better with other methods
in ClangdServer, majority of those already return LSP-specific data
types.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60179
llvm-svn: 357561
Summary:
Still some pieces to go here: unit tests for new SourceCode functionality and
a command-line flag to force utf-8 mode. But wanted to get early feedback.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275
llvm-svn: 357102
Summary:
The LSP clients cannot know clangd will not send diagnostic updates
for closed files, so we send them an empty list of diagnostics to
avoid showing stale diagnostics for closed files in the UI, e.g. in the
"Problems" pane of VSCode.
Fixes PR41217.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59757
llvm-svn: 356880
Summary:
This helps minimize the disruption of not returning declarations as part of
a find-definition response (r352864).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57580
llvm-svn: 352953
Summary:
LSP now reflects the declaration/definition distinction.
Language server changes:
- textDocument/definition now returns a definition if one is found, otherwise
the declaration. It no longer returns declaration + definition if they are
distinct.
- textDocument/declaration returns the best declaration we can find.
- For macros, the active macro definition is returned for both methods.
- For include directive, the top of the target file is returned for both.
There doesn't appear to be a discovery mechanism (we can't return everything to
clients that only know about definition), so this changes existing behavior.
In practice, it should greatly reduce the fraction of the time we need to show
the user a menu of options.
C++ API changes:
- findDefinitions is replaced by locateSymbolAt, which returns a
vector<LocatedSymbol> - one for each symbol under the cursor.
- this contains the preferred declaration, the definition (if found), and
the symbol name
This API enables some potentially-neat extensions, like swapping between decl
and def, and exposing the symbol name to the UI in the case of multiple symbols.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57388
llvm-svn: 352864
This should not happen in normal operation, as it implies that the diagnostics
with some available fixes were produced but the AST is invalid.
Moreover, the code had an error: always returned code actions ignoring the
SupportsCodeAction capability and writing a test for this is impossible,
since this can only happen due to programmer's error rather than invalid inputs.
llvm-svn: 352624
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
Summary:
This patch adds some basic supports for clang-tidy configurations in clangd:
- clangd will respect .clang-tidy configurations for each file
- we don't aim to support all clang-tidy options in clangd, only a
small subset of condfigurations (options related to which checks will be
enabled) are supported.
- add a `clang-tidy-checks` CLI option that can override options from
.clang-tidy file
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55256
llvm-svn: 351792
Summary:
Some projects make use of clang plugins when building, but clangd is
not aware of those plugins therefore can't work with the same compile command
arguments.
There were multiple places clangd performed commandline manipulations,
this one also moves them all into OverlayCDB.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, sammccall, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56841
llvm-svn: 351788
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Utkarsh Saxena