Summary: Skip over prefetches when assigning debug info to instructions with memory operands. This way, the debug info is stable after instrumenting a binary with prefetches, allowing for iterative profiling and instrumentation.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61789
llvm-svn: 360471
Summary:
Currently, if an instruction with a memory operand has no debug information,
X86DiscriminateMemOps will generate one based on the first line of the
enclosing function, or the last seen debug info.
This may cause confusion in certain debugging scenarios. The long term
approach would be to use the line number '0' in such cases, however, that
brings in challenges: the base discriminator value range is limited
(4096 values).
For the short term, adding an opt-in flag for this feature.
See bug 40319 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40319)
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, gbedwell
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, eraman, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57257
llvm-svn: 352246
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Added a pair of APIs for encoding/decoding the 3 components of a DWARF discriminator described in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html: the base discriminator, the duplication factor (useful in profile-guided optimization) and the copy index (used to identify copies of code in cases like loop unrolling)
The encoding packs 3 unsigned values in 32 bits. This CL addresses 2 issues:
- communicates overflow back to the user
- supports encoding all 3 components together. Current APIs assume a sequencing of events. For example, creating a new discriminator based on an existing one by changing the base discriminator was not supported.
Reviewers: davidxl, danielcdh, wmi, dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: zzheng, dmgreen, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55681
llvm-svn: 349973
Summary:
Macros are expanded on a single line. In case of large expansions,
with sufficiently many instructions with memory operands (and when
-fdebug-info-for-profiling is requested), we may be unable to generate
new base discriminator values - new values overflow (base
discriminators may not be larger than 2^12).
This CL warns instead of asserting in such a case. A subsequent CL
will add APIs to check for overflow before creating new debug info.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39890
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, gbedwell
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55643
llvm-svn: 349075
Summary:
Suppressed warnings in release builds due to variable used
only in assert statement.
Subscribers: llvm-commits, eraman, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55100
llvm-svn: 347939
It causes asserts building BoringSSL. See https://crbug.com/91009#c3 for
repro.
This also reverts the follow-ups:
Revert r347724 "Do not insert prefetches with unsupported memory operands."
Revert r347606 "[X86] Add dependency from X86 to ProfileData after rL347596"
Revert r347607 "Add new passes to X86 pipeline tests"
llvm-svn: 347864
Summary:
Support for profile-driven cache prefetching (X86)
This change is part of a larger system, consisting of a cache prefetches recommender, create_llvm_prof (https://github.com/google/autofdo), and LLVM.
A proof of concept recommender is DynamoRIO's cache miss analyzer. It processes memory access traces obtained from a running binary and identifies patterns in cache misses. Based on them, it produces a csv file with recommendations. The expectation is that, by leveraging such recommendations, we can reduce the amount of clock cycles spent waiting for data from memory. A microbenchmark based on the DynamoRIO analyzer is available as a proof of concept: https://goo.gl/6TM2Xp.
The recommender makes prefetch recommendations in terms of:
* the binary offset of an instruction with a memory operand;
* a delta;
* and a type (nta, t0, t1, t2)
meaning: a prefetch of that type should be inserted right before the instrution at that binary offset, and the prefetch should be for an address delta away from the memory address the instruction will access.
For example:
0x400ab2,64,nta
and assuming the instruction at 0x400ab2 is:
movzbl (%rbx,%rdx,1),%edx
means that the recommender determined it would be beneficial for a prefetchnta instruction to be inserted right before this instruction, as such:
prefetchnta 0x40(%rbx,%rdx,1)
movzbl (%rbx, %rdx, 1), %edx
The workflow for prefetch cache instrumentation is as follows (the proof of concept script details these steps as well):
1. build binary, making sure -gmlt -fdebug-info-for-profiling is passed. The latter option will enable the X86DiscriminateMemOps pass, which ensures instructions with memory operands are uniquely identifiable (this causes ~2% size increase in total binary size due to the additional debug information).
2. collect memory traces, run analysis to obtain recommendations (see above-referenced DynamoRIO demo as a proof of concept).
3. use create_llvm_prof to convert recommendations to reference insertion locations in terms of debug info locations.
4. rebuild binary, using the exact same set of arguments used initially, to which -mllvm -prefetch-hints-file=<file> needs to be added, using the afdo file obtained at step 3.
Note that if sample profiling feedback-driven optimization is also desired, that happens before step 1 above. In this case, the sample profile afdo file that was used to produce the binary at step 1 must also be included in step 4.
The data needed by the compiler in order to identify prefetch insertion points is very similar to what is needed for sample profiles. For this reason, and given that the overall approach (memory tracing-based cache recommendation mechanisms) is under active development, we use the afdo format as a syntax for capturing this information. We avoid confusing semantics with sample profile afdo data by feeding the two types of information to the compiler through separate files and compiler flags. Should the approach prove successful, we can investigate improvements to this encoding mechanism.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, craig.topper
Reviewed By: davidxl, wmi, craig.topper
Subscribers: davide, danielcdh, mgorny, aprantl, eraman, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54052
llvm-svn: 347596
Mircea Trofin