Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Anna Thomas bf7a16a768 [InlineFunction] Update valid return attributes at callsite within callee body
Consider a callee function that has a call (C) within it which feeds
into the return. When we inline that callee into a callsite that has
return attributes, we can backward propagate valid attributes to the
call (C) within that inlined callee body.

This is safe to do so only if we can guarantee transfer of execution to
successor in the window of instructions between return value (i.e. the
call C) and the return instruction.

Also, this is valid only for attributes which are a property of a
callsite and not those that are not dependent on the ABI, or a property
of the call itself.

Reviewed-By: reames, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76140
2020-04-02 14:13:12 -04:00
Anna Thomas 58a05675da Revert "[InlineFunction] Handle return attributes on call within inlined body"
This reverts commit 28518d9ae3.
There is a failure in MsgPackReader.cpp when built with clang. It
complains about "signext and zeroext" are incompatible. Investigating
offline if it is infact a UB in the MsgPackReader code.
2020-03-31 16:16:34 -04:00
Anna Thomas 28518d9ae3 [InlineFunction] Handle return attributes on call within inlined body
Consider a callee function that has a call (C) within it which feeds
into the return.  When we inline that callee into a callsite that has
return attributes, we can backward propagate those attributes to the
call (C) within that inlined callee body.

This is safe to do so only if we can guarantee transfer of execution to
successor in the window of instructions between return value (i.e. the
call C) and the return instruction.

See added test cases.

Reviewed-By: reames, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76140
2020-03-31 14:35:40 -04:00