Adjustments should be considered properly; we should copy the unadjusted object
over the whole temporary base region. If the unadjusted object is no longer
available in the Environment, invalidate the temporary base region, and then
copy the adjusted object into the adjusted sub-region of the temporary region.
This fixes a regression introduced by r288263, that caused various
false positives, due to copying only adjusted object into the adjusted region;
the rest of the base region therefore remained undefined.
Before r288263, the adjusted value was copied over the unadjusted region,
which is incorrect, but accidentally worked better due to how region store
disregards compound value bindings to non-base regions.
An additional test machinery is introduced to make sure that despite making
two binds, we only notify checkers once for both of them, without exposing
the partially copied objects.
This fix is a hack over a hack. The proper fix would be to model C++ temporaries
in the CFG, and after that dealing with adjustments would no longer be
necessary, and the values we need would no longer disappear from the
Environment.
rdar://problem/30658168
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30534
llvm-svn: 298924
In the following code involving GNU statement-expression extension:
struct S {
~S();
};
void foo() {
const S &x = ({ return; S(); });
}
function 'foo()' returns before reference x is initialized. We shouldn't call
the destructor for the temporary object lifetime-extended by 'x' in this case,
because the object never gets constructed in the first place.
The real problem is probably in the CFG somewhere, so this is a quick-and-dirty
hotfix rather than the perfect solution.
A patch by Artem Dergachev!
rdar://problem/30759076
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30499
llvm-svn: 296646
The analyzer's CFG currently doesn't have nodes for calls to temporary
destructors. This causes the analyzer to explore infeasible paths in which
a no-return destructor would have stopped exploration and so results in false
positives when no-return destructors are used to implement assertions.
To mitigate these false positives, this patch stops generates a sink after
evaluating a constructor on a temporary object that has a no-return destructor.
This results in a loss of coverage because the time at which the destructor is
called may be after the time of construction (especially for lifetime-extended
temporaries).
This addresses PR15599.
rdar://problem/29131566
llvm-svn: 290140
Yet more problems due to the missing CXXBindTemporaryExpr in the CFG for
default arguments.
Unfortunately we cannot just switch off inserting temporaries for the
corresponding default arguments, as that breaks existing tests
(test/SemaCXX/return-noreturn.cpp:245).
llvm-svn: 215554
In cases like:
struct C { ~C(); }
void f(C c = C());
void t() {
f();
}
We currently do not add the CXXBindTemporaryExpr for the temporary (the
code mentions that as the default parameter expressions are owned by
the declaration, we'd otherwise add the same expression multiple times),
but we add the temporary destructor pointing to the CXXBindTemporaryExpr.
We need to fix that before we can re-enable the assertion.
llvm-svn: 215357
Changes to the original patch:
- model the CFG for temporary destructors in conditional operators so that
the destructors of the true and false branch are always exclusive. This
is necessary because we must not have impossible paths for the path
based analysis to work.
- add multiple regression tests with ternary operators
Original description:
Fix modelling of non-lifetime-extended temporary destructors in the
analyzer.
Changes to the CFG:
When creating the CFG for temporary destructors, we create a structure
that mirrors the branch structure of the conditionally executed
temporary constructors in a full expression.
The branches we create use a CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator which
corresponds to the temporary constructor which must have been executed
to enter the destruction branch.
2. Changes to the Analyzer:
When we visit a CXXBindTemporaryExpr we mark the CXXBindTemporaryExpr as
executed in the state; when we reach a branch that contains the
corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator, we branch out
depending on whether the corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr was marked
as executed.
llvm-svn: 215096
This reverts commit r214962 because after the change the
following code doesn't compile with -Wreturn-type -Werror.
#include <cstdlib>
class NoReturn {
public:
~NoReturn() __attribute__((noreturn)) { exit(1); }
};
int check() {
true ? NoReturn() : NoReturn();
}
llvm-svn: 214998
1. Changes to the CFG:
When creating the CFG for temporary destructors, we create a structure
that mirrors the branch structure of the conditionally executed
temporary constructors in a full expression.
The branches we create use a CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator which
corresponds to the temporary constructor which must have been executed
to enter the destruction branch.
2. Changes to the Analyzer:
When we visit a CXXBindTemporaryExpr we mark the CXXBindTemporaryExpr as
executed in the state; when we reach a branch that contains the
corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr as terminator, we branch out
depending on whether the corresponding CXXBindTemporaryExpr was marked
as executed.
llvm-svn: 214962
Document and simplify ResolveCondition.
1. Introduce a temporary special case for temporary desctructors when resolving
the branch condition - in an upcoming patch, alexmc will change temporary
destructor conditions to not run through this logic, in which case we can remove
this (marked as FIXME); this currently fixes a crash.
2. Simplify ResolveCondition; while documenting the function, I noticed that it
always returns the last statement - either that statement is the condition
itself (in which case the condition was returned anyway), or the rightmost
leaf is returned; for correctness, the rightmost leaf must be evaluated anyway
(which the CFG does in the last statement), thus we can just return the last
statement in that case, too. Added an assert to verify the invariant.
llvm-svn: 207957
This reverts commit r189090.
The original patch introduced regressions (see the added live-variables.* tests). The patch depends on the correctness of live variable analyses, which are not computed correctly. I've opened PR18159 to track the proper resolution to this problem.
The patch was a stepping block to r189746. This is why part of the patch reverts temporary destructor tests that started crashing. The temporary destructors feature is disabled by default.
llvm-svn: 196593
This is an improved version of r186498. It enables ExprEngine to reason about
temporary object destructors. However, these destructor calls are never
inlined, since this feature is still broken. Still, this is sufficient to
properly handle noreturn temporary destructors.
Now, the analyzer correctly handles expressions like "a || A()", and executes the
destructor of "A" only on the paths where "a" evaluted to false.
Temporary destructor processing is still off by default and one has to
explicitly request it by setting cfg-temporary-dtors=true.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1259
llvm-svn: 189746
Summary:
ExprEngine had code which specificaly disabled using CXXTempObjectRegions in
InitListExprs. This was a hack put in r168757 to silence a false positive.
The underlying problem seems to have been fixed in the mean time, as removing
this code doesn't seem to break anything. Therefore I propose to remove it and
solve PR16629 in the process.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1325
llvm-svn: 188059
Summary:
When binding a temporary object to a static local variable, the analyzer would
complain about a dangling reference even though the temporary's lifetime should
be extended past the end of the function. This commit tries to detect these
cases and construct them in a global memory region instead of a local one.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1133
llvm-svn: 187196
This occurs because in C++11 the compound literal syntax can trigger a
constructor call via list-initialization. That is, "Point{x, y}" and
"(Point){x, y}" end up being equivalent. If this occurs, the inner
CXXConstructExpr will have already handled the object construction; the
CompoundLiteralExpr just needs to propagate that value forwards.
<rdar://problem/13804098>
llvm-svn: 181213
Normally, we need to look through derived-to-base casts when creating
temporary object regions (added in r175854). However, if the temporary
is a pointer (rather than a struct/class instance), we need to /preserve/
the base casts that have been applied.
This also ensures that we really do create a new temporary region when
we need to: MaterializeTemporaryExpr and lvalue CXXDefaultArgExprs.
Fixes PR15342, although the test case doesn't include the crash because
I couldn't isolate it.
llvm-svn: 176069
With the new support for trivial copy constructors, we are not always
consistent about whether a CXXTempObjectRegion gets reused or created
from scratch, which affects whether qualifiers are preserved. However,
we probably don't care anyway.
This also switches to using the current PrintingPolicy for the type,
which means C++ types don't get a spurious 'struct' prefix anymore.
llvm-svn: 176068
This is a follow-up to r175830, which made sure a temporary object region
created for, say, a struct rvalue matched up with the initial bindings
being stored into it. This does the same for the case in which the AST
actually tells us that we need to create a temporary via a
MaterializeObjectExpr. I've unified the two code paths and moved a static
helper function onto ExprEngine.
This also caused a bit of test churn, causing us to go back to describing
temporary regions without a 'const' qualifier. This seems acceptable; it's
our behavior from a few months ago.
<rdar://problem/13265460> (part 2)
llvm-svn: 175854
When creating a temporary region (say, when a struct rvalue is used as
the base of a member expr), make sure we account for any derived-to-base
casts. We don't actually record these in the LazyCompoundVal that
represents the rvalue, but we need to make sure that the temporary region
we're creating (a) matches the bindings, and (b) matches its expression.
Most of the time this will do exactly the same thing as before, but it
fixes spurious "garbage value" warnings introduced in r175234 by the use
of lazy bindings to model trivial copy constructors.
<rdar://problem/13265460>
llvm-svn: 175830
...after a host of optimizations related to the use of LazyCompoundVals
(our implementation of aggregate binds).
Originally applied in r173951.
Reverted in r174069 because it was causing hangs.
Re-applied in r174212.
Reverted in r174265 because it was /still/ causing hangs.
If this needs to be reverted again it will be punted to far in the future.
llvm-svn: 175234
...again. The problem has not been fixed and our internal buildbot is still
getting hangs.
This reverts r174212, originally applied in r173951, then reverted in r174069.
Will not re-apply until the entire project analyzes successfully on my
local machine.
llvm-svn: 174265
It's causing hangs on our internal analyzer buildbot. Will restore after
investigating.
This reverts r173951 / baa7ca1142990e1ad6d4e9d2c73adb749ff50789.
llvm-svn: 174069
This is faster for the analyzer to process than inlining the constructor
and performing a member-wise copy, and it also solves the problem of
warning when a partially-initialized POD struct is copied.
Before:
CGPoint p;
p.x = 0;
CGPoint p2 = p; <-- assigned value is garbage or undefined
After:
CGPoint p;
p.x = 0;
CGPoint p2 = p; // no-warning
This matches our behavior in C, where we don't see a field-by-field copy.
<rdar://problem/12305288>
llvm-svn: 173951
The idea is to eventually place all analyzer options under
"analyzer-config". In addition, this lays the ground for introduction of
a high-level analyzer mode option, which will influence the
default setting for IPAMode.
llvm-svn: 173385
In C++, objects being returned on the stack are actually copy-constructed into
the return value. That means that when a temporary is returned, it still has
to be destroyed, i.e. the returned expression will be wrapped in an
ExprWithCleanups node. Our "returning stack memory" checker needs to look
through this node to see if we really are returning an object by value.
PR13722
llvm-svn: 162817
Artem Dergachev