getNumUses is a linear time operation. It traverses the user linked list to the end and counts as it goes. Since we are only interested in small constant counts, we should use hasNUses or hasNUsesMore more that terminate the traversal as soon as it can provide the answer.
There are still two other locations in InstCombine, but changing those would force a rebase of D44266 which if accepted would remove them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44398
llvm-svn: 327315
getNumUses is a linear operation. It walks a linked list to get a count. So in this case its better to just ask if there are any users rather than how many.
llvm-svn: 327314
This is the FP equivalent of D42818. Use it for the few cases in InstSimplify
with -0.0 folds (that's the only current use of m_NegZero()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43792
llvm-svn: 327307
After two failed attempts last week to make this work I am
going back to a known good method of making this test pass on
macOS...adding the current apple-clang version to the
UNSUPPORTED list.
During a previous patch review (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44103)
it was suggested to just XFAIL libcpp-no-deduction-guides
as was done to iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp. However
this caused a an unexpected pass on:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std/builds/214
I then attempted to just mark libcpp-no-deduction-guides
as UNSUPPORTED, however this caused an additional bot
failure. So I reverted everything (https://reviews.llvm.org/rCXX327191).
To solve this and get work unblocked I am adding
apple-clang-9 to the original UNSUPPORTED list.
llvm-svn: 327304
Summary:
1) Make sure to discard dangling debug info if the variable (or
variable fragment) is mapped to something new before we had a
chance to resolve the dangling debug info.
2) When resolving debug info, make sure to bump the associated
SDNodeOrder to ensure that the DBG_VALUE is emitted after the
instruction that defines the value used in the DBG_VALUE.
This will avoid a debug-use before def scenario as seen in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36417.
The new test case, test/DebugInfo/X86/sdag-dangling-dbgvalue.ll,
show some other limitations in how dangling debug info is
handled in the SelectionDAG. Since we currently only support
having one dangling dbg.value per Value, we will end up dropping
debug info when there are more than one variable that is described
by the same "dangling value".
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, eraman, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44369
llvm-svn: 327303
This adds two features: "packets", and "nvj".
Enabling "packets" allows the compiler to generate instruction packets,
while disabling it will prevent it and disable all optimizations that
generate them. This feature is enabled by default on all subtargets.
The feature "nvj" allows the compiler to generate new-value jumps and it
implies "packets". It is enabled on all subtargets.
The exception is made for packets with endloop instructions, since they
require a certain minimum number of instructions in the packets to which
they apply. Disabling "packets" will not prevent hardware loops from
being generated.
llvm-svn: 327302
Summary:
This pattern came up in PR36682:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36682https://godbolt.org/g/LhuD9A
Tests for proposed fix in D44367.
Looking at the IR pattern in question, as per [[ https://github.com/rutgers-apl/alive-nj | alive-nj ]], for all the type combinations i checked
(input: `i16`, `i32`, `i64`; intermediate: `half`/`i16`, `float`/`i32`, `double`/`i64`)
for the following `icmp` comparisons the `sitofp`+`bitcast` can be dropped:
* `eq 0`
* `ne 0`
* `slt 0`
* `sle 0`
* `sge 0`
* `sgt 0`
* `slt 1`
* `sge 1`
* `sle -1`
* `sgt -1`
I did not check vectors, but i'm guessing it's the same there.
{F5887419}
Thus all these cases are in the testcase (along with the vector variant with additional `undef` element in the middle).
There are no negative patterns here (unless alive-nj lied/is broken), all of these should be optimized.
Generated with {F5887551}
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, efriedma, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: nlopes, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44390
llvm-svn: 327301
Remove the special casing for MRM_F8 by using HANDLE_OPTIONAL.
This should be NFC as the forms that were missing aren't used by any instructions today. They exist in the enum so that we didn't have to put them in one at a time when instructions are added. But looks like we failed here.
llvm-svn: 327298
Summary:
This is a new version of D44261, which broke some builds with older gcc, as
they can't align on a constexpr, but rather require an integer (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56859) among others.
We introduce `SANITIZER_CACHE_LINE_SIZE` in `sanitizer_platform.h` to be
used in `ALIGNED` attributes instead of using directly `kCacheLineSize`.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, thakis
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44326
llvm-svn: 327297
MVT belongs to the CodeGen layer, but ShuffleDecode is used by the X86 InstPrinter which is part of the MC layer. This only worked because MVT is completely implemented in a header file with no other library dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44353
llvm-svn: 327292
Since the enqueued kernels have internal linkage, their names may be dropped.
In this case, give them unique names __amdgpu_enqueued_kernel or
__amdgpu_enqueued_kernel.n where n is a sequential number starting from 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44322
llvm-svn: 327291
This bug was found by accident while trying to expand out testcases
for imported symbols, and is covered by the additional test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44331
llvm-svn: 327290
This matches the existing ordering that's been there for globals
for a while (__stack_pointer coming first).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44333
llvm-svn: 327286
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect the following as an
Objective-C block type:
FOO(^);
when it actually must be a C or C++ macro dealing with an XOR
statement or an XOR operator overload.
According to the Clang Block Language Spec:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BlockLanguageSpec.html
block types are of the form:
int (^)(char, float)
and block variables of block type are of the form:
void (^blockReturningVoidWithVoidArgument)(void);
int (^blockReturningIntWithIntAndCharArguments)(int, char);
void (^arrayOfTenBlocksReturningVoidWithIntArgument[10])(int);
This tightens up the detection so we don't unnecessarily detect
C macros which pass in the XOR operator.
Depends On D43904
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests &&
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: djasper, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43906
llvm-svn: 327285
Summary:
Previously, clang-format would detect C++11 and C++17 attribute
specifiers like the following as Objective-C method invocations:
[[noreturn]];
[[clang::fallthrough]];
[[noreturn, deprecated("so sorry")]];
[[using gsl: suppress("type")]];
To fix this, I ported part of the logic from
tools/clang/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp into TokenAnnotator.cpp so we
can explicitly parse and identify C++11 attribute specifiers.
This allows the guessLanguage() and getStyle() APIs to correctly
guess files containing the C++11 attribute specifiers as C++,
not Objective-C.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, jolesiak, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43902
llvm-svn: 327284
Summary:
The new implementation attaches notes to diagnostic message and shows
the original diagnostics in the message of the note.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits, jkorous-apple
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44142
llvm-svn: 327282
Summary:
This is an important ranking signal.
It's off for the dynamic index for now. Correspondingly, tell the index
infrastructure only to report declarations for the dynamic index.
Reviewers: ioeric, hokein
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44315
llvm-svn: 327275
Jim Ingham