* Test the case where a symbol is sometimes linkonce_odr and sometimes weak_odr
* Test the visibility of the symbols at the IR level, after the internalize
stage of LTO is done. (Previously we only checked the visibility of
symbols in the final output binary.)
Reviewed By: modimo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121428
Per discussion on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709#inline-1148734, this seems like the
right course of action. `canBeOmittedFromSymbolTable()` subsumes and
generalizes the previous logic. In addition to handling `linkonce_odr`
`unnamed_addr` globals, we now also internalize `linkonce_odr` +
`local_unnamed_addr` constants.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120173
Symbols for which `canBeOmittedFromSymbolTable()` is true should be
treated as private externs. This diff tries to do that by unsetting the
ExportDynamic bit. It seems to mostly work with the FullLTO backend, but
with the ThinLTO backend, the `local_unnamed_addr` symbols still fail to
be properly hidden. Nonetheless, this is a step in the right direction.
I've documented all the remaining differences between our behavior and
LD64's in the lto-internalized-unnamed-addr.ll test.
See also https://discourse.llvm.org/t/mach-o-lto-handling-of-linkonce-odr-unnamed-addr/60015
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thevinster
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119767
Jez Ng