D101513 means that we no longer need to specify `-pie` in most of our
test RUN commands. Let's clean up the unused flags so as not to confuse
future test writers.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113114
codesign/libstuff checks that the `__LLVM` segment is directly
before `__LINKEDIT` by checking that `fileOff + fileSize == next segment
fileOff`. Previously, there would be gaps between the segments due to
the fact that their fileOffs are page-aligned but their fileSizes
aren't. In order to satisfy codesign, we page-align fileOff *before*
calculating fileSize. (I don't think codesign checks for the relative
ordering of other segments, so in theory we could do this just for
`__LLVM`, but ld64 seems to do it for all segments.)
Note that we *don't* round up the fileSize of the `__LINKEDIT` segment.
Since it's the last segment, it doesn't need to worry about contiguity;
in addition, codesign checks that the last (hidden) section in
`__LINKEDIT` covers the last byte of the segment, so if we rounded up
`__LINKEDIT`'s size we would have to do the same for its last section,
which is a bother.
While at it, I also addressed a FIXME in the linkedit-contiguity.s test
to cover more `__LINKEDIT` sections.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100848
This pleases the codesign
(Otherwise it complains about "function starts data out of place")
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98648
codesign (or more specifically libstuff) checks that each section in
__LINKEDIT ends where the next one starts -- no gaps are permitted. This
diff achieves it by aligning every section's start and end points to
WordSize.
Remarks: ld64 appears to satisfy the constraint by adding padding bytes
when generating the __LINKEDIT data, e.g. by emitting BIND_OPCODE_DONE
(which is a 0x0 byte) repeatedly. I think the approach this diff takes
is a bit more elegant, but I'm not sure if it's too restrictive. In
particular, it assumes padding always uses the zero byte. But we can
revisit this later.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84718
Nico Weber