Currently, the regular expression that matches the lines of assembly for PPC LE
(ELFv2) does not work for the assembly for BE (ELFv1). This patch fixes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53059
llvm-svn: 345363
Don't try to generate large PIC code for non-ELF targets. Neither COFF
nor MachO have relocations for large position independent code, and
users have been using "large PIC" code models to JIT 64-bit code for a
while now. With this change, if they are generating ELF code, their
JITed code will truly be PIC, but if they target MachO or COFF, it will
contain 64-bit immediates that directly reference external symbols. For
a JIT, that's perfectly fine.
llvm-svn: 337740
begin label emitted for some routines with personality functions and
such.
Without this, we don't even recognize such functions as appearing in the
output and so don't attach any assertions to them. Happy to tweak this
or improve it if folks w/ deeper knowledge of the asm sequences that
show up here want.
llvm-svn: 336987
Reverting because this is causing failures in the LLDB test suite on
GreenDragon.
LLVM ERROR: unsupported relocation with subtraction expression, symbol
'__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' can not be undefined in a subtraction
expression
llvm-svn: 335894
The large code model allows code and data segments to exceed 2GB, which
means that some symbol references may require a displacement that cannot
be encoded as a displacement from RIP. The large PIC model even relaxes
the assumption that the GOT itself is within 2GB of all code. Therefore,
we need a special code sequence to materialize it:
.LtmpN:
leaq .LtmpN(%rip), %rbx
movabsq $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.LtmpN, %rax # Scratch
addq %rax, %rbx # GOT base reg
From that, non-local references go through the GOT base register instead
of being PC-relative loads. Local references typically use GOTOFF
symbols, like this:
movq extern_gv@GOT(%rbx), %rax
movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax
All calls end up being indirect:
movabsq $local_fn@GOTOFF, %rax
addq %rbx, %rax
callq *%rax
The medium code model retains the assumption that the code segment is
less than 2GB, so calls are once again direct, and the RIP-relative
loads can be used to access the GOT. Materializing the GOT is easy:
leaq _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_(%rip), %rbx # GOT base reg
DSO local data accesses will use it:
movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax
Non-local data accesses will use RIP-relative addressing, which means we
may not always need to materialize the GOT base:
movq extern_gv@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
Direct calls are basically the same as they are in the small code model:
They use direct, PC-relative addressing, and the PLT is used for calls
to non-local functions.
This patch adds reasonably comprehensive testing of LEA, but there are
lots of interesting folding opportunities that are unimplemented.
I restricted the MCJIT/eh-lg-pic.ll test to Linux, since the large PIC
code model is not implemented for MachO yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47211
llvm-svn: 335508
Summary:
The large code model allows code and data segments to exceed 2GB, which
means that some symbol references may require a displacement that cannot
be encoded as a displacement from RIP. The large PIC model even relaxes
the assumption that the GOT itself is within 2GB of all code. Therefore,
we need a special code sequence to materialize it:
.LtmpN:
leaq .LtmpN(%rip), %rbx
movabsq $_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-.LtmpN, %rax # Scratch
addq %rax, %rbx # GOT base reg
From that, non-local references go through the GOT base register instead
of being PC-relative loads. Local references typically use GOTOFF
symbols, like this:
movq extern_gv@GOT(%rbx), %rax
movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax
All calls end up being indirect:
movabsq $local_fn@GOTOFF, %rax
addq %rbx, %rax
callq *%rax
The medium code model retains the assumption that the code segment is
less than 2GB, so calls are once again direct, and the RIP-relative
loads can be used to access the GOT. Materializing the GOT is easy:
leaq _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_(%rip), %rbx # GOT base reg
DSO local data accesses will use it:
movq local_gv@GOTOFF(%rbx), %rax
Non-local data accesses will use RIP-relative addressing, which means we
may not always need to materialize the GOT base:
movq extern_gv@GOTPCREL(%rip), %rax
Direct calls are basically the same as they are in the small code model:
They use direct, PC-relative addressing, and the PLT is used for calls
to non-local functions.
This patch adds reasonably comprehensive testing of LEA, but there are
lots of interesting folding opportunities that are unimplemented.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47211
llvm-svn: 335297
Summary:
Lack of that support has taken me by surprise.
I need to add (or at least look at) some tests for https://reviews.llvm.org/D47980#1127615,
and i don't really fancy doing that by hand.
The asm pattern is quite similar to that of x86:
https://godbolt.org/g/hfgeds
just with `#` replaced with `;`
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, MaskRay, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, rampitec, bogner, mareko, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48001
llvm-svn: 334396
This patch replaces the --x86_extra_scrub command line argument to automatically support a second level of regex-scrubbing if it improves the matching of nearly-identical code patterns. The argument '--extra_scrub' is there now to force extra matching if required.
This is mostly useful to help us share 32-bit/64-bit x86 vector tests which only differs by retl/retq instructions, but any scrubber can now technically support this, meaning test checks don't have to be needlessly obfuscated.
I've updated some of the existing checks that had been manually run with --x86_extra_scrub, to demonstrate the extra "ret{{[l|q]}}" scrub now only happens when useful, and re-run the sse42-intrinsics file to show extra matches - most sse/avx intrinsics files should be able to now share 32/64 checks.
Tested with the opt/analysis scripts as well which share common code - AFAICT the other update scripts use their own versions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47485
llvm-svn: 333749
If we don't mark the cfi line as optional, the script won't
work with 'nounwind' code. Without that attr, there may be
extra noise in the asm body that we don't want to see.
llvm-svn: 330453
The script allows the auto-generation of checks for cost model tests to speed up their creation and help improve coverage, which will help a lot with PR36550.
If the need arises we can add support for other analyze passes as well, but the cost models was the one I needed to get done - at the moment it just warns that any other analysis mode is unsupported.
I've regenerated a couple of x86 test files to show the effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45272
llvm-svn: 329390
fact use regular expression syntax to use regular expressions.
Should restore the bots. Sorry for the noise on this test.
Thanks to Philip for spotting the bug!
llvm-svn: 329057
do explicit scrubbing of the offsets of stack spills and reloads.
You can always turn this off in order to test specific stack slot usage.
We were already hiding most of this, but the new logic hides it more
generically. Notably, we should effectively hide stack slot churn in
functions that have a frame pointer now, and should also hide it when
changing a function from stack pointer to frame pointer. That transition
already changes enough to be clearly noticed in the test case diff,
showing *every* spill and reload is really noisy without benefit. See
the test case I ran this on as a classic example.
llvm-svn: 329055
Summary:
This revision refactors 1. parser 2. CHECK line adder of utils/update_{,llc_}test_checks.py
so that thir functionality can be re-used by other utility scripts (e.g. D42712)
Reviewers: asb, craig.topper, RKSimon, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42805
llvm-svn: 324803
Nemanja Ivanovic