Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hal Finkel b03dd4be70 [ValueTracking] Don't delete assumes of side-effectful instructions
ValueTracking has to strike a balance when attempting to propagate information
backwards from assumes, because if the information is trivially propagated
backwards, it can appear to LLVM that the assumption is known to be true, and
therefore can be removed.

This is sound (because an assumption has no semantic effect except for causing
UB), but prevents the assume from allowing further optimizations.

The isEphemeralValueOf check exists to try and prevent this issue by not
removing the source of an assumption. This tries to make it a little bit more
general to handle the case of side-effectful instructions, such as in

  %0 = call i1 @get_val()
  %1 = xor i1 %0, true
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %1)

Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda, thanks!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36590

llvm-svn: 310859
2017-08-14 17:11:43 +00:00
Sanjay Patel baac743254 [ValueTracking] regenerate checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 291468
2017-01-09 19:31:20 +00:00
Jingyue Wu 12b0c2835e [ValueTracking] do not overwrite analysis results already computed
Summary:
ValueTracking used to overwrite the analysis results computed from
assumes and dominating conditions. This patch fixes this issue.

Test Plan: test/Analysis/ValueTracking/assume.ll

Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer

Reviewed By: majnemer

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10283

llvm-svn: 239718
2015-06-15 05:46:29 +00:00