Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel 6da0fb8c74 [InstCombine] add tests to show pattern matching failures due to commutation
I was looking to fix a bug in getComplexity(), and these cases showed up as 
obvious failures. I'm not sure how to find these in general though.

llvm-svn: 281055
2016-09-09 16:35:20 +00:00
Sanjay Patel ed9fda01a3 [InstCombine] regenerate checks
llvm-svn: 280991
2016-09-08 21:32:21 +00:00
Sonam Kumari 72ccc3c428 Removal Of Duplicate Test Cases and Addition Of Missing Check Statements
llvm-svn: 223768
2014-12-09 10:46:38 +00:00
David Majnemer 5d1aeba2ea InstCombine: Fold ((A | B) & C1) ^ (B & C2) -> (A & C1) ^ B if C1^C2=-1
Adapted from a patch by Richard Smith, test-case written by me.

llvm-svn: 216157
2014-08-21 05:14:48 +00:00
Mayur Pandey 960507beb4 InstCombine: ((A & ~B) ^ (~A & B)) to A ^ B
Proof using CVC3 follows:
$ cat t.cvc
A, B : BITVECTOR(32);
QUERY BVXOR((A & ~B),(~A & B)) = BVXOR(A,B);
$ cvc3 t.cvc
Valid.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4898

llvm-svn: 215974
2014-08-19 08:19:19 +00:00
David Majnemer 698dca0b95 InstCombine: ((A | ~B) ^ (~A | B)) to A ^ B
Proof using CVC3 follows:
$ cat t.cvc
A, B : BITVECTOR(32);
QUERY BVXOR((A | ~B),(~A |B)) = BVXOR(A,B);
$ cvc3 t.cvc
Valid.

Patch by Mayur Pandey!

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4883

llvm-svn: 215621
2014-08-14 06:46:25 +00:00
Karthik Bhat a4a4db91be InstCombine: Combine (xor (or %a, %b) (xor %a, %b)) to (add %a, %b)
Correctness proof of the transform using CVC3-

$ cat t.cvc
A, B : BITVECTOR(32);
QUERY BVXOR(A | B, BVXOR(A,B) ) = A & B;

$ cvc3 t.cvc
Valid.

llvm-svn: 215524
2014-08-13 05:13:14 +00:00
Suyog Sarda 1c6c2f69f7 This patch implements transform for pattern "(A | B) & ((~A) ^ B) -> (A & B)".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4628

llvm-svn: 214478
2014-08-01 04:59:26 +00:00
David Majnemer 42af3601c2 InstCombine: Simplify (A ^ B) or/and (A ^ B ^ C)
While we can already transform A | (A ^ B) into A | B, things get bad
once we have (A ^ B) | (A ^ B ^ Cst) because reassociation will morph
this into (A ^ B) | ((A ^ Cst) ^ B).  Our existing patterns fail once
this happens.

To fix this, we add a new pattern which looks through the tree of xor
binary operators to see that, in fact, there exists a redundant xor
operation.

What follows bellow is a correctness proof of the transform using CVC3.

$ cat t.cvc
A, B, C : BITVECTOR(64);

QUERY BVXOR(A, B) | BVXOR(BVXOR(B, C), A) = BVXOR(A, B) | C;
QUERY BVXOR(BVXOR(A, C), B) | BVXOR(A, B) = BVXOR(A, B) | C;

QUERY BVXOR(A, B) & BVXOR(BVXOR(B, C), A) = BVXOR(A, B) & ~C;
QUERY BVXOR(BVXOR(A, C), B) & BVXOR(A, B) = BVXOR(A, B) & ~C;

$ cvc3 < t.cvc
Valid.
Valid.
Valid.
Valid.

llvm-svn: 214342
2014-07-30 21:26:37 +00:00
Stephen Lin c1c7a1309c Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.
This update was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186268
2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer d5d7f37beb InstCombine: Add a bunch of combines of the form x | (y ^ z).
We usually catch this kind of optimization through InstSimplify's distributive
magic, but or doesn't distribute over xor in general.

"A | ~(A | B) -> A | ~B" hits 24 times on gcc.c.

llvm-svn: 126081
2011-02-20 13:23:43 +00:00