Implement the following semantic check:
"A list item may not appear in a linear clause, unless it is the loop iteration variable."
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100224
To ensure that errors are emitted by CheckConformance and
its callers in all situations, it's necessary for the returned result
of that function to distinguish between three possible
outcomes: the arrays are known to conform at compilation time,
the arrays are known to not conform (and a message has been
produced), and an indeterminate result in which is not possible
to determine conformance. So convert CheckConformance's
result into an optional<bool>, and convert its confusing
Boolean flag arguments into a bit-set of named flags too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103654
A recent change was made in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101482 to cope
with kind parameters. It had the side effect of generating some type
info symbols inside derived type scopes. Derived type scope symbols
are meant for components, and other/later compilation phases might
choke when finding compiler generated symbols there that are not
components.
This patch preserves the fix from D101482 while still generating the
symbols outside of derived type scopes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103621
When a subroutine or function symbol is defined in an INTERFACE
block, it's okay if a symbol of the same name appears in a
scope between the global scope and the scope of the INTERFACE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103580
Add some missing error messages, and permit the appearance
of EntityDetails symbols in dummy argument type characterization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103576
When a procedure pointer with no interface is called by a
function reference, complain about the lack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103573
In something like "ASSOCIATE(X=>T(1))", the "T(1)" is parsed
as a Variable because it looks like a function reference or
array reference; if it turns out to be a structure constructor,
which is something we can't know until we're able to attempt
generic interface resolution in semantics, the parse tree needs
to be fixed up by replacing the Variable with an Expr.
The compiler could already do this for putative function references
encapsulated as Exprs, so this patch moves some code around and
adds parser::Selector to the overloads of expression analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103572
The constexpr-capable class evaluate::DynamicType represented
CHARACTER length only with a nullable pointer into the declared
parameters of types in the symbol table, which works fine for
anything with a declaration but turns out to not suffice to
describe the results of the ACHAR() and CHAR() intrinsic
functions. So extend DynamicType to also accommodate known
constant CHARACTER lengths, too; use them for ACHAR & CHAR;
clean up several use sites and fix regressions found in test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103571
A procedure pointer is allowed to name a specific intrinsic function
from F'2018 table 16.2 as its interface, but not other intrinsic
procedures. Catch this error, and thereby also fix a crash resulting
from a failure later in compilation from failed characteristics;
while here, also catch the similar error with initializers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103570
As a benign extension common to other Fortran compilers,
accept BOZ literals in array constructors w/o explicit
types, treating them as integers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103569
In error recovery situations, the mappings from source locations
to scopes were failing in a way that tripped some asserts.
Specifically, FindPureProcedureContaining() wasn't coping well
when starting at the global scope. (And since the global scope
no longer has a source range, clean up the Semantics constructor
to avoid confusion.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103567
It's possible to specify defined input/output procedures either as a
type-bound procedure of a derived type or as a defined-io-generic-spec. This
means that you can specify the same procedure in both mechanisms, which does
not cause problems. Alternatively, you can specify two different procedures to
be the defined input/output procedure for the same derived type. This is an
error. This change catches this error. The situation is slightly complicated
by parameterized derived types. Types with the same value for a KIND parameter
are treated as the same type while types with different KIND parameters are
treated as different types.
I implemented this check by adding a vector to keep track of which defined
input/output procedures had been seen for which derived types along with the
kind of procedure (read vs write and formatted vs unformatted). I also added
tests for non-parameterized types and types parameterized by KIND and LEN type
parameters.
I also removed an erroneous check from the code that creates runtime type
information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103560
Each var argument to an attach or detach clause must be a
Fortran variable or array with the pointer or allocatable attribute.
This patch enforce this restruction.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103279
This patch adds the following Fortran specific semantic checks for the OpenMP
Allocate directive.
1) A type parameter inquiry cannot appear in an ALLOCATE directive.
2) List items specified in the ALLOCATE directive must not have the ALLOCATABLE
attribute unless the directive is associated with an ALLOCATE statement.
Co-authored-by: Irina Dobrescu <irina.dobrescu@arm.com>
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102061
Defined input/output procedures are specified in 12.6.4.8. There are different
versions for read versus write and formatted versus unformatted, but they all
share the same basic set of dummy arguments.
I added several checking functions to check-declarations.cpp along with a test.
In the process of implementing this, I noticed and fixed a typo in
.../lib/Evaluate/characteristics.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103045
A recent fix for problems with ENTRY statement handling didn't
get the case of a procedure dummy argument on an ENTRY statement
in an executable part right; the code presumed that those dummy
arguments would be objects, not entities that might be objects or
procedures. Fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103098
Dummy arguments of ENTRY statements in execution parts were
not being created as objects, nor were they being implicitly
typed.
When the symbol corresponding to an alternate ENTRY point
already exists (by that name) due to having been referenced
in an earlier call, name resolution used to delete the extant
symbol. This isn't the right thing to do -- the extant
symbol will be pointed to by parser::Name nodes in the parse
tree while no longer being part of any Scope.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102948
This patch implements the following semantic check:
```
A master region may not be closely nested inside a work-sharing, loop, atomic, task, or taskloop region.
```
Adds a test case and also modifies a couple of existing test cases to include the check.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100228
Add overloads to AsGenericExpr() in Evaluate/tools.h to take care
of wrapping an untyped DataRef or bare Symbol in a typed Designator
wrapped up in a generic Expr<SomeType>. Use the new overloads to
replace a few instances of code that was calling TypedWrapper<>()
with a dynamic type.
This new tool will be useful in lowering to drive some code that
works with typed expressions (viz., list-directed I/O list items)
when starting with only a bare Symbol (viz., NAMELIST).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102352
When producing the runtime type information for a component of a derived type
that had a LEN type parameter, we were not allowing a KIND parameter of the
derived type. This was causing one of the NAG correctness tests to fail
(.../hibiya/d5.f90).
I added a test to our own test suite to check for this.
Also, I fixed a typo in .../module/__fortran_type_info.f90.
I allowed KIND type parameters to be used for the declarations of components
that use LEN parameters by constant folding the value of the LEN parameter. To
make the constant folding work, I had to put the semantics::DerivedTypeSpec of
the associated derived type into the folding context. To get this
semantics::DerivedTypeSpec, I changed the value of the semantics::Scope object
that was passed to DescribeComponent() to be the derived type scope rather than
the containing non-derived type scope.
This scope change, in turn, caused differences in the symbol table output that
is checked in typeinfo01.f90. Most of these differences were in the order that
the symbols appeared in the dump. But one of them changed one of the values
from "CHARACTER(2_8,1)" to "CHARACTER(1_8,1)". I'm not sure if these changes
are significant. Please verify that the results of this test are still valid.
Also, I wonder if there are other situations in this code where we should be
folding constants. For example, what if the field of a component has a
component whose type is a PDT with a LEN type parameter, and the component's
declaration depends on the KIND type parameter of the current PDT. Here's an
example:
type string(stringkind)
integer,kind :: stringkind
character(stringkind) :: value
end type string
type outer(kindparam)
integer,kind :: kindparam
type(string(kindparam)) :: field
end type outer
I don't understand the code or what it's trying to accomplish well enough to
figure out if such cases are correctly handled by my new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101482
We were not correctly handling structure constructors that had forward
references to parameterized derived types. I harvested the code that checks
for forward references that was used during analysis of function call
expressions and called it from there and also called it during the
analysis of structure constructors.
I also added a test that will produce an internal error without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101330
We were not checking that attributes that are supposed to be specific to
dummy arguments were not being used for local entities. I added the checks
along with tests for them.
After implementing these new checks, I found that one of the tests in
separate-mp02.f90 was erroneous, and I fixed it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101126
Andrezj W. @ Arm discovered that the runtime derived type table
building code in semantics was detecting fatal errors in the tests
that the f18 driver wasn't printing. This patch fixes f18 so that
these messages are printed; however, the messages were not valid user
errors, and the rest of this patch fixes them up.
There were two sources of the bogus errors. One was that the runtime
derived type information table builder was calculating the shapes of
allocatable and pointer array components in derived types, and then
complaining that they weren't constant or LEN parameter values, which
of course they couldn't be since they have to have deferred shapes
and those bounds were expressions like LBOUND(component,dim=1).
The second was that f18 was forwarding the actual LEN type parameter
expressions of a type instantiation too far into the uses of those
parameters in various expressions in the declarations of components;
when an actual LEN type parameter is not a constant value, it needs
to remain a "bare" type parameter inquiry so that it will be lowered
to a descriptor inquiry and acquire a captured expression value.
Fixing this up properly involved: moving some code into new utility
function templates in Evaluate/tools.h, tweaking the rewriting of
conversions in expression folding to elide needless integer kind
conversions of type parameter inquiries, making type parameter
inquiry folding *not* replace bare LEN type parameters with
non-constant actual parameter values, and cleaning up some
altered test results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101001
This patch adds semantic checks for the General Restrictions of the
Allocate Directive.
Since the requires directive is not yet implemented in Flang, the
restriction:
```
allocate directives that appear in a target region must
specify an allocator clause unless a requires directive with the
dynamic_allocators clause is present in the same compilation unit
```
will need to be updated at a later time.
A different patch will be made with the Fortran specific restrictions of
this directive.
I have used the code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D89395 for the
CheckObjectListStructure function.
Co-authored-by: Isaac Perry <isaac.perry@arm.com>
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91159
We were erroneously not taking into account the constant values of LEN type
parameters of parameterized derived types when checking for argument
compatibility. The required checks are identical to those for assignment
compatibility. Since argument compatibility is checked in .../lib/Evaluate and
assignment compatibility is checked in .../lib/Semantics, I moved the common
code into .../lib/Evaluate/tools.cpp and changed the assignment compatibility
checking code to call it.
After implementing these new checks, tests in resolve53.f90 were failing
because the tests were erroneous. I fixed these tests and added new tests
to call03.f90 to test argument passing of parameterized derived types more
completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100989
We were erroneously emitting error messages for assignments of derived types
where the associated objects were instantiated with non-constant LEN type
parameters.
I fixed this by adding the member function MightBeAssignmentCompatibleWith() to
the class DerivedTypeSpec and calling it to determine whether it's possible
that objects of parameterized derived types can be assigned to each other. Its
implementation first compares the uninstantiated values of the types. If they
are equal, it then compares the values of the constant instantiated type
parameters.
I added tests to assign04.f90 to exercise this new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100868
An empty NAME= should mean that there is no C binding, not the
binding that would result from BIND(C) without a NAME=.
See 18.10.2p2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100494
We were not instantiating procedure pointer components. If the instantiation
contained errors, we were not reporting them. This resulted in internal errors
in later processing.
I fixed this by adding code in .../lib/Semantics/type.cpp in
InstantiateComponent() to handle a component with ProcEntityDetails. I also
added several tests for various good and bad instantiations of procedure
pointer components.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100341
F18 supports the standard intrinsic function SELECTED_REAL_KIND
but not its synonym in the standard module IEEE_ARITHMETIC
named IEEE_SELECTED_REAL_KIND until this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100066
For pernicious test cases with explicit non-constant actual
type parameter expressions in components, e.g.:
type :: t(k)
integer, kind :: k
type(t(k+1)), pointer :: p
end type
we should detect the infinite recursion and complain rather
than looping until the stack overflows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100065
Check for two or more symbols that define a data object or entry point
with the same interoperable BIND(C) name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100067
We were not folding type parameter inquiries for the form 'var%typeParam'
where 'typeParam' was a KIND or LEN type parameter of a derived type and 'var'
was a designator of the derived type. I fixed this by adding code to the
function 'FoldOperation()' for 'TypeParamInquiry's to handle this case. I also
cleaned up the code for the case where there is no designator.
In order to make the error messages correctly refer to both the points of
declaration and instantiation, I needed to add an argument to the function
'InstantiateIntrinsicType()' for the location of the instantiation.
I also changed the formatting of 'TypeParamInquiry' to correctly format this
case. I also added tests for both KIND and LEN type parameter inquiries in
resolve104.f90.
Making these changes revealed an error in resolve89.f90 and caused one of the
error messages in assign04.f90 to be different.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99892
We were not folding type parameter inquiries for the form 'var%typeParam'
where 'typeParam' was a KIND or LEN type parameter of a derived type and 'var'
was a designator of the derived type. I fixed this by adding code to the
function 'FoldOperation()' for 'TypeParamInquiry's to handle this case. I also
cleaned up the code for the case where there is no designator.
In order to make the error messages correctly refer to both the points of
declaration and instantiation, I needed to add an argument to the function
'InstantiateIntrinsicType()' for the location of the instantiation.
I also changed the formatting of 'TypeParamInquiry' to correctly format this
case. I also added tests for both KIND and LEN type parameter inquiries in
resolve104.f90.
Making these changes revealed an error in resolve89.f90 and caused one of the
error messages in assign04.f90 to be different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99892
f18 was emitting a bogus error message about the lack of a TARGET
attribute when a pointer was initialized with a component of a
variable that was a legitimate TARGET.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99665
When writing tests for a previous problem, I ran across situations where the
compiler was failing calls to CHECK(). In these situations, the compiler had
inconsistent semantic information because the programs were erroneous. This
inconsistent information was causing the calls to CHECK().
I fixed this by avoiding the code that ended up making the failed calls to
CHECK() and making sure that we were only avoiding these situations when the
associated symbols were erroneous.
I also added tests that would cause the calls to CHECK() without these changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99342
Binding labels start as expressions but they have to evaluate to
constant character of default kind, so they can be represented as an
std::string. Leading and trailing blanks have to be removed, so the
folded expression isn't exactly right anyway.
So all BIND(C) symbols now have a string binding label, either the
default or user-supplied one. This is recorded in the .mod file.
Add WithBindName mix-in for details classes that can have a binding
label so that they are all consistent. Add GetBindName() and
SetBindName() member functions to Symbol.
Add tests that verifies that leading and trailing blanks are ignored
in binding labels and that the default label is folded to lower case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99208
Binding labels start as expressions but they have to evaluate to
constant character of default kind, so they can be represented as an
std::string. Leading and trailing blanks have to be removed, so the
folded expression isn't exactly right anyway.
So all BIND(C) symbols now have a string binding label, either the
default or user-supplied one. This is recorded in the .mod file.
Add WithBindName mix-in for details classes that can have a binding
label so that they are all consistent. Add GetBindName() and
SetBindName() member functions to Symbol.
Add tests that verifies that leading and trailing blanks are ignored
in binding labels and that the default label is folded to lower case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99208
When writing tests for a previous problem, I ran across situations where we
were not producing error messages for declarations of specific procedures of
generic interfaces where every other compiler I tested (except nvfotran) did.
I added a check to CheckExtantExternal() and renamed it since it now checks for
erroneous extant symbols generally.
I also removed a call to this function from processing for ENTRY statements,
since it seemed unnecessary and its presence caused bogus error messages.
I also added some tests for erroneous declarations where we were not producing
error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99111
If you specify a specific procedure of a generic interface that has the same
name as both the generic interface and a preceding derived type, the compiler
would fail an internal call to CHECK(). I fixed this by testing for this
situation when processing specific procedures. I also added a test that will
cause the call to CHECK() to fail without this new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99085
This patch fixes a bug to allow ordered construct within a non-worksharing loop, also adds more sema checks.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98733
Replace semantics::SymbolSet with alternatives that clarify
whether the set should order its contents by source position
or not. This matters because positionally-ordered sets must
not be used for Symbols that might be subjected to name
replacement during name resolution, and address-ordered
sets must not be used (without sorting) in circumstances
where the order of their contents affects the output of the
compiler.
All set<> and map<> instances in the compiler that are keyed
by Symbols now have explicit Compare types in their template
instantiations. Symbol::operator< is no more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98878
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for interop directive.
Support for the 'init' clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98558
1. Generate the mapping for clauses between the parser class and the
corresponding clause kind for OpenMP and OpenACC using tablegen.
2. Add a common function to get the OmpObjectList from the OpenMP
clauses to avoid repetition of code.
Reviewed by: Kiranchandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98603
In parser::AllCookedSources, implement a map from CharBlocks to
the CookedSource instances that they cover. This permits a fast
Find() operation based on std::map::equal_range to map a CharBlock
to its enclosing CookedSource instance.
Add a creation order number to each CookedSource. This allows
AllCookedSources to provide a Precedes(x,y) predicate that is a
true source stream ordering between two CharBlocks -- x is less
than y if it is in an earlier CookedSource, or in the same
CookedSource at an earlier position.
Add a reference to the singleton SemanticsContext to each Scope.
All of this allows operator< to be implemented on Symbols by
means of a true source ordering. From a Symbol, we get to
its Scope, then to the SemanticsContext, and then use its
AllCookedSources reference to call Precedes().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98743
`parser::AllocateObject` and `parser::PointerObject` can be represented
as typed expressions once analyzed. This simplifies the work for parse-tree
consumers that work with typed expressions to deal with allocatable and
pointer objects such as lowering.
This change also makes it easier to add typedExpr in the future by
automatically handling nodes that have this member when possible.
Changes:
- Add a `mutable TypedExpr typedExpr` field to `parser::PointerObject` and `parser::AllocateObject`.
- Add a `parser::HasTypedExpr<T>` helper to better share code relating to typedExpr in the parse tree.
- Add hooks in `semantics::ExprChecker` for AllocateObject and PointerObject nodes, and use
ExprOrVariable on it to analyze and set the tyedExpr field during
expression analysis. This required adding overloads for `AssumedTypeDummy`.
- Update check-nullify.cpp and check-deallocate.cpp to not re-analyze the StructureComponent but to
use the typedExpr field instead.
- Update dump/unparse to use HasTypedExpr and use the typedExpr when there is one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98256
An older version of a function (Fortran::semantics::FindFunctionResult) was
left in flang/lib/Semantics/tools.cpp, and this breaks the static library
build due to a conflict with the intended final version in another
file and library. Remove the old code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98568
Fortran permits a reference to a function whose result is a pointer
to be used as a definable variable in any context where a
designator could appear. This patch wrings out remaining bugs
with such usage and adds more testing.
The utility predicate IsProcedurePointer(expr) had a misleading
name which has been corrected to IsProcedurePointerTarget(expr).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98555
If you specify a type-bound procedure with an alternate return, there
will be no symbol associated with that dummy argument. In such cases,
the compiler's list of dummy arguments will contain a nullptr. In our
analysis of the PASS arguments of type-bound procedures, we were
assuming that all dummy arguments had non-null symbols associated with
them and were using that assumption to get the name of the dummy
argument. This caused the compiler to try to dereference a nullptr.
I fixed this by explicitly checking for a nullptr and, in such cases, emitting
an error message. I also added tests that contain type-bound procedures with
alternate returns in both legal and illegal constructs to ensure that semantic
analysis is working for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98430
You can define a base type with a type-bound procedure which is erroneously
missing a NOPASS attribute and then define another type that extends the base
type and overrides the erroneous procedure. In this case, when we perform
semantic checking on the overriding procedure, we verify the "pass index" of
the overriding procedure. The attempt to get the procedure's pass index fails
a call to CHECK().
I fixed this by calling SetError() on the symbol of the overridden procedure in
the base type. Then, I check HasError() before executing the code that invokes
the failing call to CHECK(). I also added a test that will cause the compiler
to fail the call to CHECK() without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98355
When we have a subprogram that has been determined to contain errors, we do not
perform name resolution on its execution part. In this case, if the subprogram
contains a NULLIFY statement, the parser::Name of a pointer object in a NULLIFY
statement will not have had name resolution performed on it. Thus, its symbol
will not have been set. Later, however, we do semantic checking on the NULLIFY
statement. The code that did this assumed that the parser::Name of the
pointer object was non-null.
I fixed this by just removing the null pointer check for the "symbol" member of
the "parser::Name" of the pointer object when doing semantic checking for
NULLIFY statements. I also added a test that will make the compiler crash
without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98184
We were allowing procedures with the MODULE prefix to be declared at the global
scope. This is prohibited by C1547 and was causing an internal check of the
compiler to fail.
I fixed this by adding a check. I also added a test that would trigger a crash
without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97875
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined
dummy procedure arguments by removing extra apostrophes and sorting the
list of symbols.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This patch supersedes D97749.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97774
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined
dummy procedure arguments by removing extra apostrophes and sorting the
list of symbols.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This patch supersedes D97749.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97774
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined dummy
procedure arguments.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This change supersedes D97201.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97749
Semantic checks for the following OpenMP 4.5 clauses.
1. 2.15.4.2 - Copyprivate clause
2. 2.15.3.4 - Firstprivate clause
3. 2.15.3.5 - Lastprivate clause
Add related test cases and resolve test cases marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91920
This reverts commit 07de0846a5.
The original patch has caused 6 out 8 of Flang's public buildbots to
fail. As I'm not sure what the fix should be, I'm reverting this for
now. Please see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201 for more context and
discussion.
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was
defined using the name of the procedure. But the procedure name was
being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous
symbols. I fixed this by making SymbolSet be an ordered set, which does
not use the "<" operator.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
And I fixed the formatting on an error message from a previous update.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201
Most Fortran compilers accept the following benign extension,
and it appears in some applications:
SUBROUTINE FOO(A,N)
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL A(N) ! N is used before being typed
INTEGER N
END
Allow it in f18 only for default integer scalar dummy arguments.
Differential Revesion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96982
Fortran 2018 explicitly permits an ignored type declaration
for the result of a generic intrinsic function. See the comment
added to Semantics/expression.cpp for an explanation of why this
is somewhat dangerous and worthy of a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96879
The intrinsic procedure table properly classify the various
intrinsics, but the PURE and ELEMENTAL attributes that these
classifications imply don't always make it to the utility
predicates that test symbols for them, leading to spurious
error messages in some contexts. So set those attribute flags
as appropriate in name resolution, using a new function to
isolate the tests.
An alternate solution, in which the predicates would query
the intrinsic procedure table for these attributes on demand,
was something I also tried, so that this information could
come directly from an authoritative source; but it would have
required references to the intrinsic table to be passed along
on too many seemingly unrelated APIs and ended up looking messy.
Several symbol table tests needed to have their expected outputs
augmented with the PURE and ELEMENTAL flags. Some bogus messages
that were flagged as such in test/Semantics/doconcurrent01.f90 were
removed, since they are now correctly not emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96878
Fix Flang build after addition of a new OpenMP clauses for a clang patch (D76342).
Flang is using TableGen to generation the declaration of clause checks and the new clause
was missing a definiton.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96808
Implementation of Do loop iteration variable check, Do while loop check, Do loop cycle restrictions.
Also to check whether the ordered clause is present on the loop construct if any ordered region ever
binds to a loop region arising from the loop construct.
Files:
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
resolve-directives.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do06-positivecases.f90
omp-do06.f90
omp-do08.f90
omp-do09.f90
omp-do10.f90
omp-do11.f90
omp-do12.f90
omp-do13.f90
omp-do14.f90
omp-do15.f90
omp-do16.f90
omp-do17.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92732
Instead of using a message attachment with further details,
emit the details as part of a single message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96465
When accessing a specific procedure of a USE-associated generic
interface, we need to allow for the case in which that specific
procedure has the same name as the generic when testing for
its availability in the current scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96467
Some state in name resolution is stored in the DeclarationVisitor
instance and processed at the end of the specification part.
This state needs to accommodate nested specification parts, namely
the ones that can be nested in a subroutine or function interface
body.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96466
Split up MeasureSizeInBytes() so that array element sizes can be
calculated accurately; use the new API in some places where
DynamicType::MeasureSizeInBytes() was being used but the new
API performs better due to TypeAndShape having precise CHARACTER
length information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95897
This patch is a follow up to D94821 to ensure the correct behavior of the
general directive structure checker.
This patch add the generation of the Enter function declaration for clauses in
the TableGen backend.
This helps to ensure each clauses declared in the TableGen file has at least
a basic check.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95108
Analyze the shape of the result of TRANSFER(ptr,array) correctly
when "ptr" is an array of deferred shape. Fixing this bug led to
some refactoring and concentration of common code in TypeAndShape
member functions with code in general shape and character length
analysis, and this led to some regression test failures that have
all been cleaned up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95744
Legacy Fortran implementations support an alternative form of the
PARAMETER statement; it differs syntactically from the standard's
PARAMETER statement by lacking parentheses, and semantically by
using the type and shape of the initialization expression to define
the attributes of the named constant. (GNU Fortran gets that part
wrong; Intel Fortran and nvfortran have full support.)
This patch disables the old style PARAMETER statement by default, as
it is syntactically ambiguous with conforming assignment statements;
adds a new "-falternative-parameter-statement" option to enable it;
and implements it correctly when enabled.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48774, in which a user
tripped over the syntactic ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95697
* Remove an unimplemented and unused member function declaration
* Remove a misleading comment about an unrelated constraint number
* Fix a comment
* Add f18 crash message to "flang" driver script
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95180
Don't emit a bogus error message about a bad forward reference
when it's an IMPORT of a USE-associated symbol; don't ignore
intrinsic functions when USE-associating the contents of a
module when the intrinsic has been explicitly USE'd; allow
PUBLIC or PRIVATE accessibility attribute to be specified
for an enumerator before the declaration of the enumerator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95175
It's possible to declare deferred shape array using the POINTER
statement, for example:
POINTER :: var(:)
When analyzing POINTER declarations, we were not capturing the array
specification information, if present. I fixed this by changing the
"Post" function for "parser::PointerDecl" to check to see if the
declaration contained a "DeferredShapeSpecList". In such cases, I
analyzed the shape and used to information to declare an "ObjectEntity"
that contains the shape information rather than an "UnknownEntity".
I also added a couple of small tests that fail to compile without these
changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95080
* IsArrayElement() needs another option to control whether it
should ignore trailing component references.
* Add IsObjectPointer().
* Add const Scope& variants of IsFunction() and IsProcedure().
* Make TypeAndShape::Characterize() work with procedure bindings.
* Handle CHARACTER length in MeasureSizeInBytes().
* Fine-tune FindExternallyVisibleObject()'s handling of dummy arguments
to conform with Fortran 2018: only INTENT(IN) and dummy pointers
in pure functions signify; update two tests accordingly.
Also: resolve some stylistic inconsistencies and add a missing
"const" in the expression traversal template framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95011
F18 Clause 19.4p9 says:
The associate names of an ASSOCIATE construct have the scope of the
block.
Clause 11.3.1p1 says the ASSOCIATE statement is not itself in the block:
R1102 associate-construct is: associate-stmt block end-associate-stmt
Associate statement associations are currently fully processed from left
to right, incorrectly interposing associating entities earlier in the
list on same-named entities in the host scope.
1 program p
2 logical :: a = .false.
3 real :: b = 9.73
4 associate (b => a, a => b)
5 print*, a, b
6 end associate
7 print*, a, b
8 end
Associating names 'a' and 'b' at line 4 in this code are now both
aliased to logical host entity 'a' at line 2. This happens because the
reference to 'b' in the second association incorrectly resolves 'b' to
the entity in line 4 (already associated to 'a' at line 2), rather than
the 'b' at line 3. With bridge code to process these associations,
f18 output is:
F F
F 9.73
It should be:
9.73 F
F 9.73
To fix this, names in right-hand side selector variables/expressions
must all be resolved before any left-hand side entities are resolved.
This is done by maintaining a stack of lists of associations, rather
than a stack of associations. Each ASSOCIATE statement's list of
assocations is then visited once for right-hand side processing, and
once for left-hand side processing.
Note that other construct associations do not have this problem.
SELECT RANK and SELECT TYPE each have a single assocation, not a list.
Constraint C1113 prohibits the right-hand side of a CHANGE TEAM
association from referencing any left-hand side entity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95010
The utility routine WhyNotModifiable() needed to become more
aware of the use of pointers in data-refs; the targets of
pointer components are sometimes modifiable even when the
leftmost ("base") symbol of a data-ref is not.
Added a new unit test for WhyNotModifiable() that uses internal
READ statements (mostly), since I/O semantic checking uses
WhyNotModifiable() for all its definability checking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94849
The TableGen emitter for directives has two slots for flangClass information and this was mainly
to be able to keep up with the legacy openmp parser at the time. Now that all clauses are encapsulated in
AccClause or OmpClause, these two strings are not necessary anymore and were the the source of couple
of problem while working with the generic structure checker for OpenMP.
This patch remove the flangClassValue string from DirectiveBase.td and use the string flangClass as the
placeholder for the encapsulated class.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94821
Add Semantic checks for OpenMP 4.5 - 2.7.4 Workshare Construct.
- The structured block in a workshare construct may consist of only
scalar or array assignments, forall or where statements,
forall, where, atomic, critical or parallel constructs.
- All array assignments, scalar assignments, and masked array
assignments must be intrinsic assignments.
- The construct must not contain any user defined function calls unless
the function is ELEMENTAL.
Test cases : omp-workshare03.f90, omp-workshare04.f90, omp-workshare05.f90
Resolve test cases (omp-workshare01.f90 and omp-workshare02.f90) marked as XFAIL
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93091
When a reference to a generic interface occurs in a specification
expression that must be emitted to a module file, we have a problem
when the generic resolves to a function whose name is inaccessible
due to being PRIVATE or due to a conflict with another use of the
same name in the scope. In these cases, construct a new name for
the specific procedure and emit a renaming USE to the module file.
Also, relax enforcement of PRIVATE when analyzing module files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94815
C843 states that "An entity with the INTENT attribute shall be a dummy
data object or a dummy procedure pointer." This change enforces that
and fixes some tests that erroneously violated this rule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94781
Semantic checks added to check the worksharing 'single' region closely nested inside a worksharing 'do' region. And also to check whether the 'do' iteration variable is a variable in 'Firstprivate' clause.
Files:
check-directive-structure.h
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do01-positivecase.f90
omp-do01.f90
omp-do05-positivecase.f90
omp-do05.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93205
When a use-associated procedure was included in a generic, we weren't
correctly recording that fact. The ultimate symbol was added rather than
the local symbol.
Also, improve the message emitted for the specific procedure by
mentioning the module it came from.
This fixes one of the problems in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48648.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94696
This patch rename the tablegen generated file ACC.cpp.inc to ACC.inc in order
to match what was done in D92955. This file is included in header file as well as .cpp
file so it make more sense.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93485
Generic type-bound interfaces for user-defined operators need to be formatted
as "OPERATOR(.op.)", not just ".op."
PRIVATE generics need to be marked as such.
Declaration ordering: when a generic interface shadows a
derived type of the same name, it needs to be emitted to the
module file at the point of definition of the derived type;
otherwise, the derived type's definition may appear after its
first use.
The module symbol for a module read from a module file needs
to be marked as coming from a module file before semantic
processing is performed on the contents of the module so that
any special handling for declarations in module files can be
properly activated.
IMPORT statements were sometimes missing for use-associated
symbols in surrounding scopes; fine-tune NeedImport().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94636
`DirectiveStructureChecker` was passing in a pointer to a temporary
string for the `construct` argument to the constructor for `LabelEnforce`.
The `LabelEnforce` object had a lifetime longer than the temporary,
resulting in accessing a dangling pointer when emitting an error message
for `omp-parallell01.f90`.
The fix is to make the lifetime of the temporary as long as the lifetime
of the `LabelEnforce` object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94618
It's possible to declare an external procedure and then pass it as an
actual argument to a subprogram expecting a procedure argument. I added
tests for this and added an error message to distinguish passing an
actual argument with an implicit interface from passing an argument with
a mismatched explicit interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94505
If a module specifies default private accessibility, names that have
been use-associated are private by default. This was not reflected in
.mod files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94602
When needed due to a specification expression in a derived type,
the host association symbols should be created in the surrounding
subprogram's scope instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94567
In some contexts, including the motivating case of determining whether
the expressions that define the shape of a variable are "constant expressions"
in the sense of the Fortran standard, expression rewriting via Fold()
is not necessary, and should not be required. The inquiry intrinsics LBOUND,
UBOUND, and SIZE work correctly now in specification expressions and are
classified correctly as being constant expressions (or not). Getting this right
led to a fair amount of API clean-up as a consequence, including the
folding of shapes and TypeAndShape objects, and new APIs for shapes
that do not fold for those cases where folding isn't needed. Further,
the symbol-testing predicate APIs in Evaluate/tools.h now all resolve any
associations of their symbols and work transparently on use-, host-, and
construct-association symbols; the tools used to resolve those associations have
been defined and documented more precisely, and their clients adjusted as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94561
`CheckNoBranching` is currently handling only illegal branching out for constructs
with `Parser::Name` in them.
Extend the same for handling illegal branching out caused by `Parser::Label` based statements.
This patch could possibly solve one of the issues(typically branching out) mentioned in D92735.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93447
Remove duplicated function to check for required clauses on a directive. This was
still there from the merging of OpenACC and OpenMP common semantic checks and it can now be
removed so we use only one function.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93575
Internal subprograms have explicit interfaces. If an internal subprogram has
an alternate return, we check its explicit interface. But we were not
putting the label values of alternate returns into the actual argument.
I fixed this by changing the definition of actual arguments to be able
to contain a common::Label and putting the label for an alternate return
into the actual argument.
I also verified that we were already doing all of the semantic checking
required for alternate returns and removed a "TODO" for this.
I also added the test altreturn06.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94017
Add semantic check for most of the restrictions for the declare directive.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92741
After discussion in D93105 we found that the reduction clause was not following
the common OmpClause convention. This patch makes reduction clause part of OmpClause
with a value of OmpReductionClause in a similar way than task_reduction.
The unparse function for OmpReductionClause is adapted since the keyword and parenthesis
are issued by the corresponding unparse function for parser::OmpClause::Reduction.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93482
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
Co-authored-by: Valentin Clement <clementval@gmail.com>
When an abstract interface is defined, add the ABSTRACT attribute to
subprogram symbols that define the interface body. Make use of that
when writing .mod files to include "abstract" on the interface statement.
Also, fix a problem with the order of symbols in a .mod file. Sometimes
a name is mentioned before the "real" declaration, e.g. in an access
statement. We want the order to be based on the real definitions. In
these cases we replace the symbol name with an identical name with a
different source location. Then by sorting based on the source location
we get symbols in the right order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93572
OpenMP 4.5 - Variables that appear in expressions for statement function definitions
may not appear in OpenMP Private, Firstprivate or Lastprivate clauses.
Test case : omp-private03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93213
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpDistScheduleClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function for `OmpDistScheduleClause` is adapted since the keyword
and parenthesis are issued by the corresponding unparse function for
`parser::OmpClause::DistSchedule`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93644
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpNoWait` clause part of `OmpClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93643
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpProcBindClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function is dropped as the unparsing is done by `WALK_NESTED_ENUM`
for `OmpProcBindClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93642
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpDefaultClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function is dropped as the unparsing is done by `WALK_NESTED_ENUM`
for `OmpDefaultClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93641
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `allocate` clause part of `OmpClause`.The unparse function for
`OmpAllocateClause` is adapted since the keyword and parenthesis are issued by
the corresponding unparse function for `parser::OmpClause::Allocate`.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93640
Use the TableGen feature to have enum values for clauses.
Next step will be to extend the MLIR part used currently by OpenMP
to use the same enum on the dialect side.
This patch also add function that convert the enum to StringRef to be
used on the dump-parse-tree from flang.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93576
We were only checking the restrictions of IMPLICIT NONE(EXTERNAL) when a
procedure name is first encountered. But it can also happen with an
existing symbol, e.g. if an external function's return type is declared
before is it called. This change adds a check in that branch too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93552
Remove the OpenMP clause information from the OMPKinds.def file and use the
information from the new OMP.td file. There is now a single source of truth for the
directives and clauses.
To avoid generate lots of specific small code from tablegen, the macros previously
used in OMPKinds.def are generated almost as identical. This can be polished and
possibly removed in a further patch.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92955
This patch add some checks for the restriction on the routine directive
and fix several issue at the same time.
Validity tests have been added in a separate file than acc-clause-validity.f90 since this one
became quite large. I plan to split the larger file once on-going review are done.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92672
Names in EQUIVALENCE statements are only allowed to indicate local
objects as per 19.5.1.4, paragraph 2, item (10). Thus, a name appearing
in an EQUIVALENCE statement with no corresponding declaration in the
same scope is an implicit declaration of the name. If that scope
contains an IMPLICIT NONE, it's an error.
I implemented this by adding a state variable to ScopeHandler to
indicate if we're resolving the names in an EQUIVALENCE statement and
then checked this state when resolving names. I also added a test to
the existing tests for EQUIVALENCE statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93345
Some operators have more than one name, e.g. operator(==), operator(.eq).
That was working correctly in generic definitions but they can also
appear in other contexts: USE statements and access statements, for
example.
This changes FindInScope to always look for each of the names for
a symbol. So an operator may be use-associated under one name but
declared private under another name and it will be the same symbol.
This replaces GenericSpecInfo::FindInScope which was only usable in
some cases.
Add a version of FindInScope() that looks in the current scope to
simplify many of the calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93344
STORAGE_SIZE() is a standard inquiry intrinsic (size in bits
of an array element of the same type as the argument); SIZEOF()
is a common extension that returns the size in bytes of its
argument; C_SIZEOF() is a renaming of SIZEOF() in module ISO_C_BINDING.
STORAGE_SIZE() and SIZEOF() are implemented via rewrites to
expressions; these expressions will be constant when the necessary
type parameters and bounds are also constant.
Code to calculate the sizes of types (with and without alignment)
was isolated into Evaluate/type.* and /characteristics.*.
Code in Semantics/compute-offsets.* to calculate sizes and alignments
of derived types' scopes was exposed so that it can be called at type
instantiation time (earlier than before) so that these inquiry intrinsics
could be called from specification expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93322
When merging use associations into a generic, we weren't handling
the case where the name that was use associated was itself a use
association. This is fixed by following that association to its
ultimate symbol (`useUltimate` in `DoAddUse`).
An example of the bug is `m12d` in `resolve17.f90`. `g` is associated
with `gc` in `m12c` which is associated with `gb` in `m12b`. It was that
last association that we weren't correctly following.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93343
Remove resolved & moot TODO comments in Common/, Parser/,
and Evaluate/. Address a pending one relating to parsing
ambiguity in DATA statement constants, handling it with
symbol table information in Semantics and adding a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93323
Before this patch, the Restorer depended on copy elision to happen.
Without copy elision, the function ScopedSet calls the move constructor
before its dtor. The dtor will prematurely restore the reference to the
original value.
Instead of relying the compiler to not use the Restorer's copy
constructor, delete its copy and assign operators. Hence, callers cannot
move or copy a Restorer object anymore, and have to explicitly provide
the reset state. ScopedSet avoids calling move/copy operations by
relying on unnamed return value optimization, which is mandatory in
C++17.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88797
From OMP 5.0 [2.17.8]
Restriction:
If memory-order-clause is release,acquire, or acq_rel, list items must not be specified on the flush directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89879
Patch implements restrictions from 2.17.7 of OpenMP 5.0 standard for atomic Construct. Tests for the same are added.
One of the restriction
`OpenMP constructs may not be encountered during execution of an atomic region.`
Is mentioned in 5.0 standard to be a semantic restriction, but given the stricter nature of parser in F18 it's caught at parsing itself.
This patch is a next patch in series from D88965.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89583
The semantic analysis of index-names of FORALL statements looks up symbols with
the same name as the index-name. This is needed to exclude symbols that are
not objects. But if the symbol found is host-, use-, or construct-associated
with another entity, the check fails.
I fixed this by getting the root symbol of the symbol found and doing the check
on the root symbol. This required creating a non-const version of
"GetAssociationRoot()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92970
Update all reference from the specification to the new OpenACC 3.1
document.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92120
Add restriction on loop construct associated with DO CONCURRENT. Add couple of tests to ensure
clause validity checks.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92533
Define Fortran derived types that describe the characteristics
of derived types, and instantiations of parameterized derived
types, that are of relevance to the runtime language support
library. Define a suite of corresponding C++ structure types
for the runtime library to use to interpret instances of the
descriptions.
Create instances of these description types in Semantics as
static initializers for compiler-created objects in the scopes
that define or instantiate user derived types.
Delete obsolete code from earlier attempts to package runtime
type information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92802
Arnamoy Bhattacharyya