The intrinsic table entry for INDEX mistakenly required
the optional BACK= argument to be scalar, but it's an
elemental intrinsic that can accept a conforming array.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117700
Accept any keyword argument names of the form "An" for
values of n >= 3 in calls to the intrinsic functions MAX, MIN,
and their variants, so long as "n" has no leading zero and
all the keywords are distinct. Previously, f18 was needlessly
requiring the names to be contiguous. When synthesizing keywords
to characterize the procedure's interface, don't conflict with
the program's keywords.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117701
Consistent with previously documented policy, in which
BOZ literals are accepted in non-standard-conforming circumstances
where they can be converted to an unambiguous known numeric type,
allow BOZ literals to be passed as an actual argument in a reference
to a procedure whose explicit interface has a corresponding dummy
argument with a numeric type to which the BOZ literal may be
converted. Improve error messages associated with BOZ literal
actual arguments, too: don't emit multiple errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117698
The "pad=" argument in the intrinsic function table entry for RESHAPE
has a Rank::Array constraint, and that would be fine if not for RESHAPE
already having an earlier argument that's Rank::Array. It's the only
intrinsic that has multiple Rank::Array arguments. The checking for
the Rank::Array constraint was enforcing that multiple occurrences
of it have the same rank in a call, and that's not appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117149
Max(), MIN(), and their specific variants are defined with an unlimited
number of dummy arguments named A1=, A2=, &c. whose names are almost never
used in practice but should be allowed for and properly checked for the
usual errors when they do appear. The intrinsic table's entries otherwise
have fixed numbers of dummy argument definitions, so add some special
case handling in a few spots for MAX/MIN/&c. checking and procedure
characteristics construction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114750
An erroneous entry in the intrinsics table causes semantics to
crash on a call to system_clock if the optional "count_max="
argument appears and "count=" does not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112738
Check that when a procedure pointer is initialised or assigned with an intrinsic
function, or when its interface is being defined by one, that intrinsic function
is unrestricted specific (listed in Table 16.2 of F'2018).
Mark intrinsics LGE, LGT, LLE, and LLT as restricted specific. Getting their
classifications right helps in designing the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112381
To get proper wrap-around behavior for the various kind parameter
values of the optional COUNT= and COUNT_MAX= dummy arguments to
the intrinsic subroutine SYSTEM_CLOCK, add an extra argument to
the APIs for lowering to pass the integer kind of the actual argument.
Avoid confusion by requiring that both actual arguments have the same
kind when both are present. The results of the runtime functions
remain std::int64_t and lowering should still convert them before
storing to the actual argument variables.
Rework the implementation a bit to accomodate the dynamic
specification of the kind parameter, and to clean up some coding
issues with preprocessing and templates.
Use the kind of the COUNT=/COUNT_MAX= actual arguments to determine
the clock's resolution, where possible, in conformance with other
Fortran implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111281
These functions were missing from the standard intrinsic module
IEEE_ARITHMETIC. IEEE_SCALB is an alias for the standard intrinsic
function SCALE(), and the others are defined as new builtin intrinsic
functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111253
Support the extension intrinsic subroutines EXIT([status]) and ABORT()
in the intrinsic table and runtime support library. Lowering remains
to be done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110741
Rearrange the contents of __builtin_* module files a little and
make sure that semantics implicitly USEs the module __Fortran_builtins
before processing each source file. This ensures that the special derived
types for TEAM_TYPE, EVENT_TYPE, LOCK_TYPE, &c. exist in the symbol table
where they will be available for use in coarray intrinsic function
processing.
Update IsTeamType() to exploit access to the __Fortran_builtins
module rather than applying ad hoc name tests. Move it and some
other utilities from Semantics/tools.* to Evaluate/tools.* to make
them available to intrinsics processing.
Add/correct the intrinsic table definitions for GET_TEAM, TEAM_NUMBER,
and THIS_IMAGE to exercise the built-in TEAM_TYPE as an argument and
as a result.
Add/correct/extend tests accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110356
Some intrinsic functions weren't findable because the table
wasn't strictly in order of names.
And complete a missing generalization of the extension DCONJG
to accept any kind of complex argument, like DREAL and DIMAG
were.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110002
The intrinsic inquiry functions SIZE and UBOUND -- but not LBOUND --
require a DIM= argument if their first argument is an assumed-size
array. The intrinsic SHAPE must not be used with an assumed-size
array.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109912
Added 'this_image()' to the list of functions that are evaluated as intrinsic.
Added IsCoarray functions to determine if an expression is a coarray (corank > 1).
Added save attribute to coarray variables in test file, this_image.f90.
reviewers: klausler, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108059
This reverts commit 81f8ad1769.
This seems to break the shared libs build
(linaro-flang-aarch64-sharedlibs bot) with:
undefined reference to `Fortran::semantics::IsCoarray(Fortran::semantics::Symbol const&)
(from tools/flang/lib/Evaluate/CMakeFiles/obj.FortranEvaluate.dir/tools.cpp.o)
When linking lib/libFortranEvaluate.so.14git
Added 'this_image()' to the list of functions that are evaluated as intrinsic.
Added IsCoarray functions to determine if an expression is a coarray (corank > 1).
Added save attribute to coarray variables in test file, this_image.f90.
reviewers: klausler, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108059
The double precision KindCode was ignored when building the interface
of specific intrinsic procedures leading to bad semantics checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108828
Like the similar legacy extension FLOAT(), DFLOAT() represents a
conversion from default integer to DOUBLE PRECISION. Rewrite
into a conversion operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107489
According to C7109, "A boz-literal-constant shall appear only as a
data-stmt-constant in a DATA statement, or where explicitly allowed in
16.9 as an actual argument of an intrinsic procedure." This change
enforces that constraint for output list items.
I also added a general interface to determine if an expression is a BOZ
literal constant and changed all of the places I could find where it
could be used.
I also added a test.
This change stemmed from the following issue --
https://gitlab-master.nvidia.com/fortran/f18-stage/issues/108
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106893
There are situations where the arguments of intrinsics must be
conformable, which is defined in section 3.36. This means they must
have "the same shape, or one being an array and the other being scalar".
But the check we were actually making was that their ranks were the same.
This change fixes that and adds a test for the UNPACK intrinsic, where
the FIELD argument "shall be conformable with MASK".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104936
When a function is called in a specification expression, it must be
sufficiently defined, and cannot be a recursive call (10.1.11(5)).
The best fix for this is to change the contract for the procedure
characterization infrastructure to catch and report such errors,
and to guarantee that it does emit errors on failed characterizations.
Some call sites were adjusted to avoid cascades.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104330
I added the only check that wasn't already tested along with tests for
many valid and invalid arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104318
The constexpr-capable class evaluate::DynamicType represented
CHARACTER length only with a nullable pointer into the declared
parameters of types in the symbol table, which works fine for
anything with a declaration but turns out to not suffice to
describe the results of the ACHAR() and CHAR() intrinsic
functions. So extend DynamicType to also accommodate known
constant CHARACTER lengths, too; use them for ACHAR & CHAR;
clean up several use sites and fix regressions found in test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103571
F18 supports the standard intrinsic function SELECTED_REAL_KIND
but not its synonym in the standard module IEEE_ARITHMETIC
named IEEE_SELECTED_REAL_KIND until this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100066
Fortran permits a reference to a function whose result is a pointer
to be used as a definable variable in any context where a
designator could appear. This patch wrings out remaining bugs
with such usage and adds more testing.
The utility predicate IsProcedurePointer(expr) had a misleading
name which has been corrected to IsProcedurePointerTarget(expr).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98555
Implement IEEE_SUPPORT_DATATYPE() and other inquiry intrinisic
functions from the intrinsic module IEEE_ARITHMETIC, folding all of
their results to .TRUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95830
Correct the analysis of references to transformational intrinsic
functions that have different semantics based on the presence or
absence of a DIM= argument; add shape analysis for UNPACK().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94716
In some contexts, including the motivating case of determining whether
the expressions that define the shape of a variable are "constant expressions"
in the sense of the Fortran standard, expression rewriting via Fold()
is not necessary, and should not be required. The inquiry intrinsics LBOUND,
UBOUND, and SIZE work correctly now in specification expressions and are
classified correctly as being constant expressions (or not). Getting this right
led to a fair amount of API clean-up as a consequence, including the
folding of shapes and TypeAndShape objects, and new APIs for shapes
that do not fold for those cases where folding isn't needed. Further,
the symbol-testing predicate APIs in Evaluate/tools.h now all resolve any
associations of their symbols and work transparently on use-, host-, and
construct-association symbols; the tools used to resolve those associations have
been defined and documented more precisely, and their clients adjusted as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94561
STORAGE_SIZE() is a standard inquiry intrinsic (size in bits
of an array element of the same type as the argument); SIZEOF()
is a common extension that returns the size in bytes of its
argument; C_SIZEOF() is a renaming of SIZEOF() in module ISO_C_BINDING.
STORAGE_SIZE() and SIZEOF() are implemented via rewrites to
expressions; these expressions will be constant when the necessary
type parameters and bounds are also constant.
Code to calculate the sizes of types (with and without alignment)
was isolated into Evaluate/type.* and /characteristics.*.
Code in Semantics/compute-offsets.* to calculate sizes and alignments
of derived types' scopes was exposed so that it can be called at type
instantiation time (earlier than before) so that these inquiry intrinsics
could be called from specification expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93322
This patch plugs many holes in static initializer semantics, improves error
messages for default initial values and other component properties in
parameterized derived type instantiations, and cleans up several small
issues noticed during development. We now do proper scalar expansion,
folding, and type, rank, and shape conformance checking for component
default initializers in derived types and PDT instantiations.
The initial values of named constants are now guaranteed to have been folded
when installed in the symbol table, and are no longer folded or
scalar-expanded at each use in expression folding. Semantics documentation
was extended with information about the various kinds of initializations
in Fortran and when each of them are processed in the compiler.
Some necessary concomitant changes have bulked this patch out a bit:
* contextual messages attachments, which are now produced for parameterized
derived type instantiations so that the user can figure out which
instance caused a problem with a component, have been added as part
of ContextualMessages, and their implementation was debugged
* several APIs in evaluate::characteristics was changed so that a FoldingContext
is passed as an argument rather than just its intrinsic procedure table;
this affected client call sites in many files
* new tools in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to determine when an Expr
actually is a single constant value and to validate a non-pointer
variable initializer or object component default value
* shape conformance checking has additional arguments that control
whether scalar expansion is allowed
* several now-unused functions and data members noticed and removed
* several crashes and bogus errors exposed by testing this new code
were fixed
* a -fdebug-stack-trace option to enable LLVM's stack tracing on
a crash, which might be useful in the future
TL;DR: Initialization processing does more and takes place at the right
times for all of the various kinds of things that can be initialized.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92783
Add explicit member initializers to the declarations of
some constexpr values added in a recent patch to avoid an
apparent problem with gcc 8.2.0 with default initializers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90696
2 Bug fixes:
- Do not resolve procedure as intrinsic if they appeared in an
EXTERNAL attribute statement (one path was not considering this flag)
- Emit an error if a procedure resolved to be an intrinsic function
(resp. subroutine) is used as a subroutine (resp. function).
Lowering was attempted while the evaluate::Expression for the
call was missing without any errors.
1 behavior change:
- Do not implicitly resolve subroutines (resp. functions) as intrinsics
because their name is the name of an intrinsic function (resp.
subroutine). Add justification in documentation.
Reviewed By: klausler, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90049
The class IntrinsicProcTable uses the pimpl idiom and manages its own pointer-to-implementation. However, it violates the rule-of-five and does not implement a move-constructor or assignment-operator. Due to differences between compilers in implementation copy elision, these may or may not be used. Due to the missing user implementation for resource handling, using the results in runtime errors.
Fix my using `std::unique_ptr` instead of custom resource management.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88794
In my previous implementation of the semantic checks for ASSOCIATED(), I
had neglected to check the TARGET= argument for objects to ensure that
it has either the POINTER or TARGET attributes.
I added an implementation and a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89717
Check INTENT(OUT)/INTENT(INOUT) constraints for actual argument
of intrinsic procedure calls.
- Adding a common::Intent field to the IntrinsicDummyArgument
in the intrinsic table.
- Propagating it to the DummyDataObject intent field so that it can
later be used in CheckExplicitDataArg semantic checks.
- Add related tests.
- Fix regression (C846 false error), C846 INTENT(OUT) rule does
not apply to intrinsic call. Propagate the information that we
are in an intrinsic call up to CheckExplicitDataArg (that is
doing this check). Still enforce C846 on intrinsics other than MOVE_ALLOC (for which
allocatable coarrays are explicitly allowed) since it's not clear it is allowed in all
intrinsics and allowing this would lead to runtime penalties in the intrinsic runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89473
Calling "ASSOCATED(NULL()) was causing an internal check of the compiler to
fail.
I fixed this by changing the entry for "ASSOCIATED" in the intrinsics table to
accept "AnyPointer" which contains a new "KindCode" of "pointerType". I also
changed the function "FromActual()" to return a typeless intrinsic when called
on a pointer, which duplicates its behavior for BOZ literals. This required
changing the analysis of procedure arguments. While testing processing for
procedure arguments, I found another bad call to `CHECK()` which I fixed.
I made several other changes:
-- I implemented constant folding for ASSOCIATED().
-- I fixed handling of NULL() in relational operations.
-- I implemented semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I noticed that the semantics for ASSOCIATED() are similar to those for
pointer assignment. So I extracted the code that pointer assignment uses
for procedure pointer compatibility to a place where it could be used by
the semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I couldn't figure out how to make the general semantic analysis for
procedure arguments work with ASSOCIATED()'s second argument, which can
be either a pointer or a target. So I stopped using normal semantic
analysis for arguments for ASSOCIATED().
-- I added tests for all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88313
1. Annotate the sources with constraint numbers.
2. Add tests for
*C7107 (R765) digit shall have one of the values 0 or 1.
*C7108 (R766) digit shall have one of the values 0 through 7.
*C7109 (R764) A boz-literal-constant shall appear only as a data-stmt-constant in a DATA statement, or where explicitly allowed in 16.9 as an actual argument of an intrinsic procedure.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84504
I fixed an assert caused by passing an empty array as the source= argument to
RESHAPE(). In the process, I noticed that there were no tests for RESHAPE(),
so I wrote a test that covers all the description in 16.9.163. In the process,
I made the error messages more consistent and descriptive. I also changed the
test to see if a reference to an intrinsic function was a constant to say that
it is a constant if it's a refererence to an invalid intrinsic. This avoids
emitting multiple messages for the same erroneous source.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84904
The intrinsic lowering facility is based on the generic intrinsic names to avoid
duplicating implementations. Specific intrinsics call are re-written to call to
the generic versions by the front-end but this cannot be done when specific intrinsics
are passed as arguments (the rewrite would give illegal/ambiguous unparsed Fortran).
Solve the issue by making the specific to generic name mapping accessible to lowering
and can be later used to generate the unrestricted intrinsic functions.
Reviewed By: schweitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84842
I added 'num_images()' to the list of functions that are evaluated as intrinsic. I also added a test file in flang/test/Semantics to test calls to 'num_images()'. There was a call to 'num_images()' in flang/test/Semantics/call10.f90 that expected an error, now it no longer produces an error. So I edited that file accordingly. I also edited the intrinsics unit test to add further testing of 'num_images()'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83142
Implement shape analysis for the result of the MATMUL
generic transformational intrinsic function, based on
the shapes of its arguments. Correct the names of the
arguments to match the standard, too.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82250
Summary:
This patch changes speficic extremum functions rewrite to generic MIN/MAX.
It applies to AMAX0, AMIN0, AMAX1, AMIN1, MAX0, MIN0, MAX1, MIN1, DMAX1,
and DMIN1.
- Do not re-write specific extremums to MAX/MIN in intrinsic Probe and let
folding rewrite it and introduc the conversion on the MIN/MAX result.
- Also make operand promotion explicit in MIN/MAX folding.
For instance, after this patch:
AMAX0(int8, int4) is rewritten to REAL(MAX(int8, INT(int4, 8)))
All this care is to avoid rewritting it to MAX(REAL(int8), REAL(int4))
that may not always be numerically equivalent to the first rewrite.
Reviewers: klausler, schweitz, sscalpone, jdoerfert, DavidTruby
Reviewed By: klausler, schweitz
Subscribers: llvm-commits, flang-commits
Tags: #flang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81940
Summary:
Most of these checks were already implemented, and I just added references to
them to the code and tests. Also, much of this code was already
reviewed in the old flang/f18 GitHub repository, but I didn't get to
merge it before we switched repositories.
I implemented the check for C747 to not allow coarray components in derived
types that are of type C_PTR, C_FUNPTR, or type TEAM_TYPE.
I implemented the check for C748 that requires a data component whose type has
a coarray ultimate component to be a nonpointer, nonallocatable scalar and not
be a coarray.
I implemented the check for C750 that adds additional restrictions to the
bounds expressions of a derived type component that's an array.
These bounds expressions are sepcification expressions as defined in
10.1.11. There was already code in lib/Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to
check semantics for specification expressions, but it did not check for
the extra requirements of C750.
C750 prohibits specification functions, the intrinsic functions
ALLOCATED, ASSOCIATED, EXTENDS_TYPE_OF, PRESENT, and SAME_TYPE_AS. It
also requires every specification inquiry reference to be a constant
expression, and requires that the value of the bound not depend on the
value of a variable.
To implement these additional checks, I added code to the intrinsic proc
table to get the intrinsic class of a procedure. I also added an
enumeration to distinguish between specification expressions for
derived type component bounds versus for type parameters. I then
changed the code to pass an enumeration value to
"CheckSpecificationExpr()" to indicate that the expression was a bounds
expression and used this value to determine whether to emit an error
message when violations of C750 are found.
I changed the implementation of IsPureProcedure() to handle statement
functions and changed some references in the code that tested for the
PURE attribute to call IsPureProcedure().
I also fixed some unrelated tests that got new errors when I implemented these
new checks.
Reviewers: tskeith, DavidTruby, sscalpone
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79263
Peter Klausler