If analyzeBranch fails, on some targets, the out parameters point to
some blocks in the function. But we can't use that information, so make
sure to clear it out. (In some places in IfConversion, we assume that
any block with a TrueBB is analyzable.)
The change to the testcase makes it trigger a bug on builds without this
fix: IfConvertDiamond tries to perform a followup "merge" operation,
which isn't legal, and we somehow end up with a branch to a deleted MBB.
I'm not sure how this doesn't crash the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67306
llvm-svn: 371434
The code was incorrectly counting the number of identical instructions,
and therefore tried to predicate an instruction which should not have
been predicated. This could have various effects: a compiler crash,
an assembler failure, a miscompile, or just generating an extra,
unnecessary instruction.
Instead of depending on TargetInstrInfo::removeBranch, which only
works on analyzable branches, just remove all branch instructions.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43121 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41121 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67203
llvm-svn: 371111
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Change the type in a couple of lists and sets that only store physical
registers from unsigned to MCPhysRegs. The later is only 16bits and
saves us a bit of memory.
llvm-svn: 346254
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
The TargetSchedModel is always initialized using the TargetSubtargetInfo's
MCSchedModel and TargetInstrInfo, so we don't need to extract those and
pass 3 parameters to init().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44789
llvm-svn: 329540
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
When if-converting a diamond, two separate blocks will be placed back
to back to form a straight line code. To ensure correctness of the
liveness information, any registers that are live in the second block
should not be killed in the first block, even if they were in the
original code.
Additionally, when the two blocks share common instructions at the
beginning, these instructions will not be duplicated, but only placed
once, before both of the blocks. Since the function "isIdenticalTo"
(as used here) ignores kill flags, the common initial code in one
block may have a kill flag for a register that is live in the other
block.
Because the code that removes kill flags only runs for the non-common
parts of the predicated blocks, a kill flag mismatch in the common
code could still lead to a live register being killed prematurely.
llvm-svn: 312654
Summary:
This fixes PR32721 in IfConvertTriangle and possible similar problems in
IfConvertSimple, IfConvertDiamond and IfConvertForkedDiamond.
In PR32721 we had a triangle
EBB
| \
| |
| TBB
| /
FBB
where FBB didn't have any successors at all since it ended with an
unconditional return. Then TBB and FBB were be merged into EBB, but EBB
would still keep its successors, and the use of analyzeBranch and
CorrectExtraCFGEdges wouldn't help to remove them since the return
instruction is not analyzable (at least not on ARM).
The edge updating code and branch probability updating code is now pushed
into MergeBlocks() which allows us to share the same update logic between
more callsites. This lets us remove several dependencies on analyzeBranch
and completely eliminate RemoveExtraEdges.
One thing that showed up with this patch was that IfConversion sometimes
left a successor with 0% probability even if there was no branch or
fallthrough to the successor.
One such example from the test case ifcvt_bad_zero_prob_succ.mir. The
indirect branch tBRIND can only jump to bb.1, but without the patch we
got:
bb.0:
successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
bb.1:
successors: %bb.1(0x80000000), %bb.2(0x00000000)
tBRIND %r1, 1, %cpsr
B %bb.1
bb.2:
There is no way to jump from bb.1 to bb2, but still there is a 0% edge
from bb.1 to bb.2.
With the patch applied we instead get the expected:
bb.0:
successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
bb.1:
successors: %bb.1(0x80000000)
tBRIND %r1, 1, %cpsr
B %bb.1
Since bb.2 had no predecessor at all, it was removed.
Several testcases had to be updated due to this since the removed
successor made the "Branch Probability Basic Block Placement" pass
sometimes place blocks in a different order.
Finally added a couple of new test cases:
* PR32721_ifcvt_triangle_unanalyzable.mir:
Regression test for the original problem dexcribed in PR 32721.
* ifcvt_triangleWoCvtToNextEdge.mir:
Regression test for problem that caused a revert of my first attempt
to solve PR 32721.
* ifcvt_simple_bad_zero_prob_succ.mir:
Test case showing the problem where a wrong successor with 0% probability
was previously left.
* ifcvt_[diamond|forked_diamond|simple]_unanalyzable.mir
Very simple test cases for the simple and (forked) diamond cases
involving unanalyzable branches that can be nice to have as a base if
wanting to write more complicated tests.
Reviewers: iteratee, MatzeB, grosser, kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: kbarton, davide, aemerson, nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34099
llvm-svn: 310697
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
The reverted change introdued assertions ala:
"MachineBasicBlock::succ_iterator
llvm::MachineBasicBlock::removeSuccessor(succ_iterator, bool): Assertion
`I != Successors.end() && "Not a current successor!"'
Mikael, the original committer, wrote me that he is working on a fix, but that
it likely will take some time to get this resolved. As this bug is one of the
last two issues that keep the AOSP buildbot from turning green, I revert the
original commit r302876.
I am looking forward to see this recommitted after the assertion has been
resolved.
llvm-svn: 304128
Rename the DEBUG_TYPE to match the names of corresponding passes where
it makes sense. Also establish the pattern of simply referencing
DEBUG_TYPE instead of repeating the passname where possible.
llvm-svn: 303921
Summary:
Instead of using RemoveExtraEdges (which uses analyzeBranch, which cannot
always be trusted) at the end to fixup the CFG we keep the CFG updated as
we go along and remove or add branches and merge blocks.
This way we won't have any problems if the involved MBBs contain
unanalyzable instructions.
This fixes PR32721.
In that case we had a triangle
EBB
| \
| |
| TBB
| /
FBB
where FBB didn't have any successors at all since it ended with an
unconditional return. Then TBB and FBB were be merged into EBB, but EBB
would still keep its successors, and the use of analyzeBranch and
CorrectExtraCFGEdges wouldn't help to remove them since the return
instruction is not analyzable (at least not on ARM).
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: iteratee
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33037
llvm-svn: 302876
Summary:
When trying to figure out if MBB could fallthrough to ToMBB (possibly by
falling through a bunch of other MBBs) we didn't actually check if there
was fallthrough between the last two blocks in the chain.
Reviewers: kparzysz, iteratee, MatzeB
Reviewed By: kparzysz, iteratee
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32996
llvm-svn: 302650
If a block has non-analyzable branches, the listed successors don't need
to add up to one. For example, if a block has a conditional tail call,
that tail call will not have a corresponding successor in the successor
list, but will still be a possible branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30556
llvm-svn: 297054
Add an assert that checks whether liveins are up to date before they are
used.
- Do not print liveins into .mir files anymore in situations where they
are out of date anyway.
- The assert in the RegisterScavenger is superseded by the new one in
livein_begin().
- Skip parts of the liveness updating logic in IfConversion.cpp when
liveness isn't tracked anymore (just enough to avoid hitting the new
assert()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27562
llvm-svn: 291169
Summary:
This commits moves skipDebugInstructionsForward and
skipDebugInstructionsBackward from lib/CodeGen/IfConversion.cpp
to include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h and updates
some codgen files to use them.
This refactoring was suggested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D27688
and I thought it's best to do the refactoring in a separate
review, but I could also put both changes in a single review
if that's preferred.
Also, the names for the functions aren't the snappiest and
I would be happy to rename them if anybody has suggestions.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, iteratee, aprantl, MatzeB
Subscribers: MatzeB, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27782
llvm-svn: 289933
Passing a MachineFunction as argument is more natural and avoids an
unnecessary round-trip through the logic determining the correct
Subtarget because MachineFunction already has a reference anyway.
llvm-svn: 285039
Normally, if conversion would add implicit uses for redefined registers,
e.g. R0<def> = add_if ..., R0<imp-use>. However, if only subregisters of
R0 are known to be live but not R0 itself, such implicit uses will not be
added, causing prior definitions of such subregisters and R0 itself to
become dead.
llvm-svn: 282626
Now that MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator knows when it's at
the end (since r281168 and r281170), implement
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator directly on top of an
ilist::reverse_iterator by adding an IsReverse template parameter to
MachineInstrBundleIterator. This replaces another hard-to-reason-about
use of std::reverse_iterator on list iterators, matching the changes for
ilist::reverse_iterator from r280032 (see the "out of scope" section at
the end of that commit message). MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator
now has a handle to the current node and has obvious invalidation
semantics.
r280032 has a more detailed explanation of how list-style reverse
iterators (invalidated when the pointed-at node is deleted) are
different from vector-style reverse iterators like std::reverse_iterator
(invalidated on every operation). A great motivating example is this
commit's changes to lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp.
Note: If your out-of-tree backend deletes instructions while iterating
on a MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator or converts between
MachineBasicBlock::iterator and MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator,
you'll need to update your code in similar ways to r280032. The
following table might help:
[Old] ==> [New]
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
reverse_iterator(I) std::prev(I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(std::next(I)) I.getReverse()
RI.base() std::prev(RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
std::next(RI).base() RI.getReverse()
(For more details, have a look at r280032.)
llvm-svn: 281172
One side of a diamond may end with a predicate clobbering instruction.
That side of the diamond has to be if-converted second. Both sides can't
clobber the predicate or the ifconversion is invalid. This is checked
elsewhere, but add an assert as a safety check. NFC
llvm-svn: 280518
If the entire blocks match, we would count the branch instructions
toward the number of duplicated instructions. This doesn't match what we
do elsewhere, and was causing a bug.
llvm-svn: 280448
This bug shows up with diamonds that share unpredicable, unanalyzable branches.
There's an included test case from Hexagon. What was happening was that we were
attempting to predicate the branch instruction despite the fact that it was
checked to be the same. Now for unanalyzable branches we skip over the branch
instructions when predicating the block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23939
llvm-svn: 279985
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
The cost of predicating a diamond is only the instructions that are not shared
between the two branches. Additionally If a predicate clobbering instruction
occurs in the shared portion of the branches (e.g. a cond move), it may still
be possible to if convert the sub-cfg. This change handles these two facts by
rescanning the non-shared portion of a diamond sub-cfg to recalculate both the
predication cost and whether both blocks are pred-clobbering.
Fixed 2 bugs before recommitting. Branch instructions must be compared and found
identical before diamond conversion. Also, predicate-clobbering instructions in
the shared prefix disqualifies a potential diamond conversion. Includes tests
for both.
llvm-svn: 279670
The following function currently relies on tail-merging for if
conversion to succeed. The common tail of cond_true and cond_false is
extracted, and this then forms a diamond pattern that can be
successfully if converted.
If this block does not get extracted, either because tail-merging is
disabled or the threshold is higher, we should still recognize this
pattern and if-convert it.
Fixed a regression in the original commit. Need to un-reverse branches after
reversing them, or other conversions go awry.
Regression on self-hosting bots with no obvious explanation. Tidied up range
handling to be more obviously correct, but there was no smoking gun.
define i32 @t2(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
entry:
%tmp1434 = icmp eq i32 %a, %b ; <i1> [#uses=1]
br i1 %tmp1434, label %bb17, label %bb.outer
bb.outer: ; preds = %cond_false, %entry
%b_addr.021.0.ph = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %tmp10, %cond_false ]
%a_addr.026.0.ph = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
br label %bb
bb: ; preds = %cond_true, %bb.outer
%indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb.outer ], [ %indvar.next, %cond_true ]
%tmp. = sub i32 0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
%tmp.40 = mul i32 %indvar, %tmp.
%a_addr.026.0 = add i32 %tmp.40, %a_addr.026.0.ph
%tmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
br i1 %tmp3, label %cond_true, label %cond_false
cond_true: ; preds = %bb
%tmp7 = sub i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
%tmp1437 = icmp eq i32 %tmp7, %b_addr.021.0.ph
%indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
br i1 %tmp1437, label %bb17, label %bb
cond_false: ; preds = %bb
%tmp10 = sub i32 %b_addr.021.0.ph, %a_addr.026.0
%tmp14 = icmp eq i32 %a_addr.026.0, %tmp10
br i1 %tmp14, label %bb17, label %bb.outer
bb17: ; preds = %cond_false, %cond_true, %entry
%a_addr.026.1 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %tmp7, %cond_true ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
ret i32 %a_addr.026.1
}
Without tail-merging or diamond-tail if conversion:
LBB1_1: @ %bb
@ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
cmp r0, r1
ble LBB1_3
@ BB#2: @ %cond_true
@ in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
subs r0, r0, r1
cmp r1, r0
it ne
cmpne r0, r1
bgt LBB1_4
LBB1_3: @ %cond_false
@ in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
subs r1, r1, r0
cmp r1, r0
bne LBB1_1
LBB1_4: @ %bb17
bx lr
With diamond-tail if conversion, but without tail-merging:
@ BB#0: @ %entry
cmp r0, r1
it eq
bxeq lr
LBB1_1: @ %bb
@ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
cmp r0, r1
ite le
suble r1, r1, r0
subgt r0, r0, r1
cmp r1, r0
bne LBB1_1
@ BB#2: @ %bb17
bx lr
llvm-svn: 279168
The cost of predicating a diamond is only the instructions that are not shared
between the two branches. Additionally If a predicate clobbering instruction
occurs in the shared portion of the branches (e.g. a cond move), it may still
be possible to if convert the sub-cfg. This change handles these two facts by
rescanning the non-shared portion of a diamond sub-cfg to recalculate both the
predication cost and whether both blocks are pred-clobbering.
llvm-svn: 279167
This may affect calculations for thresholds, but is not a significant change
in behavior.
The problem was that an inclusive range must have an additonal flag to showr
that it is empty, because otherwise begin == end implies that the range has one
element, and it may not be possible to move past on either side.
llvm-svn: 279166
Eli Friedman