Summary:
This class maintains the same logic as the original RetireControlUnit.
This is just an intermediate patch to make the RCU a Stage. Future patches will remove the dependency on the DispatchStage, and then more properly populate the pre/execute/post Stage interface.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: javed.absar, mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47244
llvm-svn: 333292
Summary:
The logic of dispatch remains the same, but now DispatchUnit is a Stage (DispatchStage).
This change has the benefit of simplifying the backend runCycle() code.
The same logic applies, but it belongs to different components now. This is just a start,
eventually we will need to remove the call to the DispatchStage in Scheduler.cpp, but
that will be a separate patch. This change is mostly a renaming and moving of existing logic.
This change also encouraged me to remove the Subtarget (STI) member from the
Backend class. That member was used to initialize the other members of Backend
and to eventually call DispatchUnit::dispatch(). Now that we have Stages, we
can eliminate this by instantiating the DispatchStage with everything it needs
at the time of construction (e.g., Subtarget). That change allows us to call
DispatchStage::execute(IR) as we expect to call execute() for all other stages.
Once we add the Stage list (D46907) we can more cleanly call preExecute() on
all of the stages, DispatchStage, will probably wrap cycleEvent() in that
case.
Made some formatting and minor cleanups to README.txt. Some of the text
was re-flowed to stay within 80 cols.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46983
llvm-svn: 332652
Summary: This change will help us turn the DispatchUnit into its own stage.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46916
llvm-svn: 332493
Summary:
This is just an idea, really two ideas. I expect some push-back,
but I realize that posting a diff is the most comprehensive way to express
these concepts.
This patch introduces a Stage class which represents the
various stages of an instruction pipeline. As a start, I have created a simple
FetchStage that is based on existing logic for how MCA produces
instructions, but now encapsulated in a Stage. The idea should become more concrete
once we introduce additional stages. The idea being, that when a stage completes,
the next stage in the pipeline will be executed. Stages are chained together
as a singly linked list to closely model a real pipeline. For now there is only one stage,
so the stage-to-stage flow of instructions isn't immediately obvious.
Eventually, Stage will also handle event notifications, but that functionality
is not complete, and not destined for this patch. Ideally, an interested party
can register for notifications from a particular stage. Callbacks will be issued to
these listeners at various points in the execution of the stage.
For now, eventing functionality remains similar to what it has been in mca::Backend.
We will be building-up the Stage class as we move on, such as adding debug output.
This patch also removes the unique_ptr<Instruction> return value from
InstrBuilder::createInstruction. An Instruction pointer is still produced,
but now it's up to the caller to decide how that item should be managed post-allocation
(e.g., smart pointer). This allows the Fetch stage to create instructions and
manage the lifetime of those instructions as it wishes, and not have to be bound to any
specific managed pointer type. Other callers of createInstruction might have different
requirements, and thus can manage the pointer to fit their needs. Another idea would be to push the
ownership to the RCU.
Currently, the FetchStage will wrap the Instruction
pointer in a shared_ptr. This allows us to remove the Instruction container in
Backend, which was probably going to disappear, or move, at some point anyways.
Note that I did run these changes through valgrind, to make sure we are not leaking
memory. While the shared_ptr comes with some additional overhead it relieves us
from having to manage a list of generated instructions, and/or make lookup calls
to remove the instructions.
I realize that both the Stage class and the Instruction pointer management
(mentioned directly above) are separate but related ideas, and probably should
land as separate patches; I am happy to do that if either idea is decent.
The main reason these two ideas are together is that
Stage::execute() can mutate an InstRef. For the fetch stage, the InstRef is populated
as the primary action of that stage (execute()). I didn't want to change the Stage interface
to support the idea of generating an instruction. Ideally, instructions are to
be pushed through the pipeline. I didn't want to draw too much of a
specialization just for the fetch stage. Excuse the word-salad.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46741
llvm-svn: 332390
The logic remains the same. Eventually, I see the RCU acting as its own separate stage in the instruction pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46331
llvm-svn: 331316
This patch moves the logic that collects and analyzes dispatch events to the
DispatchStatistics view.
Added flag -dispatch-stats to print statistics related to the dispatch logic.
llvm-svn: 329708
This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special
"markers" used to select regions of code.
Example:
# LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region
....
# LLVM-MCA-END
The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an
AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code
region markers.
A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new
region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end
of the last region.
This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a
optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source
code locations (SMLoc).
MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the
MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R.
By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains
every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples.
A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted
on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports
generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped.
Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the
portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see
llvm-mca-markers-5.s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433
llvm-svn: 329590
Before this patch, the "BackendStatistics" view was responsible for printing the
register file usage (as well as many other statistics).
Now users can enable register file usage statistics using the command line flag
`-register-file-stats`. By default, the tool doesn't print register file
statistics.
llvm-svn: 329083
The goal of this patch is to address most of PR36874. To fully fix PR36874 we
need to split the "InstructionInfo" view from the "SummaryView". That would make
easy to check the latency and rthroughput as well.
The patch reuses all the logic from ResourcePressureView to print out the
"instruction tables".
We have an entry for every instruction in the input sequence. Each entry reports
the theoretical resource pressure distribution. Resource pressure is uniformly
distributed across all the processor resource units of a group.
At the moment, the backend pipeline is not configurable, so the only way to fix
this is by creating a different driver that simply sends instruction events to
the resource pressure view. That means, we don't use the Backend interface.
Instead, it is simpler to just have a different code-path for when flag
-instruction-tables is specified.
Once Clement addresses bug 36663, then we can port the "instruction tables"
logic into a stage of our configurable pipeline.
Updated the BtVer2 test cases (thanks Simon for the help). Now we pass flag
-instruction-tables to each modified test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44839
llvm-svn: 328487
Function computeProcResourceMasks is used by the ResourceManager (owned by the
Scheduler) to compute resource masks for processor resources. Before this
refactoring, there was an implicit dependency between the Scheduler and the
InstrBuilder. That is because InstrBuilder has to know about resource masks when
computing the set of processor resources consumed by a new instruction.
With this patch, the functionality that computes resource masks has been
extracted from the ResourceManager, and moved to a separate file (Support.h).
This helps removing the dependency between the Scheduler and the InstrBuilder.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 327973
This allows the customization of the performance report.
Users can specify their own custom sequence of views.
Each view contributes a portion of the performance report generated by the
BackendPrinter.
Internally, class BackendPrinter keeps a sequence of views; views are printed
out in sequence when method 'printReport()' is called.
This patch addresses one of the two review comments from Clement in D43951.
llvm-svn: 327018
llvm-mca is an LLVM based performance analysis tool that can be used to
statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential
problems with target scheduling models.
llvm-mca uses information which is already available in LLVM (e.g. scheduling
models) to statically measure the performance of machine code in a specific cpu.
Performance is measured in terms of throughput as well as processor resource
consumption. The tool currently works for processors with an out-of-order
backend, for which there is a scheduling model available in LLVM.
The main goal of this tool is not just to predict the performance of the code
when run on the target, but also help with diagnosing potential performance
issues.
Given an assembly code sequence, llvm-mca estimates the IPC (instructions per
cycle), as well as hardware resources pressure. The analysis and reporting style
were mostly inspired by the IACA tool from Intel.
This patch is related to the RFC on llvm-dev visible at this link:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/121490.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43951
llvm-svn: 326998
Matt Davis