The code pattern used to implement the token rewriting hack doesn't
interact well with token caching in the pre-processor. As a result,
clang would crash on 'int f(::(id));' while doing a tenative parse of
the contents of the outer parentheses. The original code from PR11852
still doesn't crash the compiler.
This error recovery also often does the wrong thing with member function
pointers. The test case from the original PR doesn't recover the right
way either:
void S::(*pf)() = S::f; // should be 'void (S::*pf)()'
Instead we were recovering as 'void S::*pf()', which is still wrong.
If we still think that users mistakenly parenthesize identifiers in
nested name specifiers, we should change clang to intentionally parse
that form with an error, rather than doing a token rewrite.
Fixes PR26623, but I think there will be many more bugs like this around
token rewriting in the parser.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25882
llvm-svn: 289273
This saves two pointers from FunctionDecl that were being used for some
rare and questionable C-only functionality. The DeclsInPrototypeScope
ArrayRef was added in r151712 in order to parse this kind of C code:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return x; // should return 1, not 0
}
The challenge is that we parse 'int f(enum {y, x} n)' it its own
function prototype scope that gets popped before we build the
FunctionDecl for 'f'. The original change was doing two questionable
things:
1. Saving all tag decls introduced in prototype scope on a TU-global
Sema variable. This is problematic when you have cases like this, where
'x' and 'y' shouldn't be visible in 'f':
void f(void (*fp)(enum { x, y } e)) { /* no x */ }
This patch fixes that, so now 'f' can't see 'x', which is consistent
with GCC.
2. Storing the decls in FunctionDecl in ActOnFunctionDeclarator so that
they could be used in ActOnStartOfFunctionDef. This is just an
inefficient way to move information around. The AST lives forever, but
the list of non-parameter decls in prototype scope is short lived.
Moving these things to the Declarator solves both of these issues.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: jmolloy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27279
llvm-svn: 289225
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'teams distribute parallel for' pragma.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27345
llvm-svn: 289179
This commit provides class property code completion results. It supports
explicit and implicit class properties, but the special block completion is done
only for explicit properties right now.
rdar://25636195
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27053
llvm-svn: 289058
We continue to support dynamic exception specifications in C++1z as an
extension, but produce an error-by-default warning when we encounter one. This
allows users to opt back into the feature with a warning flag, and implicitly
opts system headers back into the feature should they happen to use it.
There is one semantic change implied by P0003R5 but not implemented here:
violating a throw() exception specification should now call std::terminate
directly instead of calling std::unexpected(), but since P0003R5 also removes
std::unexpected() and std::set_unexpected, and the default unexpected handler
calls std::terminate(), a conforming C++1z program cannot tell that we are
still calling it. The upside of this strategy is perfect backwards
compatibility; the downside is that we don't get the more efficient 'noexcept'
codegen for 'throw()'.
llvm-svn: 289019
an Objective-C declaration
This commit ensures that Sema won't enter a C++ declarator scope when the
current context is an Objective-C declaration. This prevents an assertion
failure in EnterDeclaratorContext that's used to ensure that current context
will be restored correctly after exiting the declarator context.
rdar://20560175
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26922
llvm-svn: 288893
import can't appear here" diagnostic if an already-visible module is textually
entered (because we have the module map but not the AST file) within a
function/namespace scope.
llvm-svn: 288737
This patch ensures that the typo fixit for the @try/@finally/@autoreleasepool {}
directive is shown only when we're parsing an actual statement where such
directives can actually be present.
rdar://19669565
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26916
llvm-svn: 288334
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'teams distribute parallel for simd' pragma.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27084
llvm-svn: 288294
Summary:
This changes pointers to cached tokens for default arguments in C++ from raw pointers to unique_ptrs. There was a fixme in the code where the cached tokens are created about using a smart pointer.
The change is straightforward, though I did have to track down and fix a memory corruption caused by the change. memcpy was being used to copy parameter information. This duplicated the unique_ptr, which led to the cached token buffer being deleted prematurely.
Patch by David Tarditi!
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: arphaman, malcolm.parsons, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26435
llvm-svn: 287241
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
- EnterExpressionEvaluationContext allows you to specify whether you
*actually* want to enter an evaluation context.
- For types that don't allow that, llvm::Optional<Foo> should do the
same thing as std::unique_ptr<Foo>, but with 100% less heap
allocations.
llvm-svn: 286500
The ObjC class protocol list assumes there is an associated location for each protocol but no location is provided
when the protocol list comes from a typedef, and we end up with a buffer overflow when trying to get locations for the protocol names.
Fixes crash of rdar://28980278.
llvm-svn: 286331
Use better heuristics to detect if a '{' might be the start of the constructor body
or not. Especially when there is a completion token.
Fix the test 'test/CodeCompletion/ctor-initializer.cpp ' when clang defaults to c++11
The problem was is how we recover invalid code in the ctor-init part as we skip the
function body. In particular, we want to know if a '{' is the begining of the body.
In C++03, we always consider it as the beginng of the body. The problem was that in
C++11, it may be the start of an initializer, so we skip over it, causing further
parse errors later. (It is important that we are able to parse correctly the rest
of the class definition, to know what are the class member, for example)
This commit is improving the heuristics to decide if the '{' is starting a function
body. The rules are the following: If we are not in a template argument, and that the
previous tokens are not an identifier, or a >, then it is much more likely to be the
function body. We verify that further by checking the token after the matching '}'
The commit also fix the behavior when there is a code_completion token in the
ctor-initializers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21502
llvm-svn: 285883
This patch implements the register call calling convention, which ensures
as many values as possible are passed in registers. CodeGen changes
were committed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284108.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25204
llvm-svn: 285849
This commit changes code completion results for Objective-C block properties:
clang now suggests an additional completion result that displays the block
property together with '=' and the block literal placeholder for the appropriate
readwrite block properties.
This commit uses a simple heuristic to determine when it's appropriate to
suggest a setter completion for block properties: the additional block setter
completion is provided iff the member access that's being completed is a
standalone statement.
rdar://28481726
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25520
llvm-svn: 284472
Summary:
These cause us to consider all functions in-between to be __host__
__device__.
You can nest these pragmas; you just can't have more 'end's than
'begin's.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: tra, jhen, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24975
llvm-svn: 283677
Summary:
This is probably the sane place for the attribute to go, but nvcc
specifically rejects it. Other GNU-style attributes are allowed in this
position (although judging from the warning it emits for
host/device/global, those attributes are applied to the lambda's
anonymous struct, not to the function itself).
It would be nice to have a FixIt message here, but doing so, or even
just getting the correct range for the attribute, including its '((' and
'))'s, is apparently Hard.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25115
llvm-svn: 282911
Summary: There's an overload that we can use to make this a bit cleaner.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25114
llvm-svn: 282910
Summary: This is ugh, but it makes us compatible with NVCC. Fixes bug 26341.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25103
llvm-svn: 282879
Fix a crash-on-invalid.
When parsing type arguments and protocols,
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() calls ParseTypeName(), which tries to
find matching tokens for '[', '(', etc whenever they appear among potential
type names. If unmatched, ParseTypeName() yields a tok::eof token stream. This
leads to crashes since the parsing at this point is not expected to go beyond
the param list closing '>'.
Fix that by properly handling tok::eof in
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() callers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23852
rdar://problem/25063557
llvm-svn: 281383
This mostly behaves cl.exe's behavior, even though clang-cl is stricter in some
corner cases and more lenient in others (see the included test).
To make the uuid declared previously here diagnostic work correctly, tweak
stripTypeAttributesOffDeclSpec() to keep attributes in the right order.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24469
llvm-svn: 281367
Parse pragma intrinsic, display warning if the function isn't a builtin
function in clang and suggest including intrin.h.
Patch by Albert Gutowski!
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23944
llvm-svn: 280825
Some Windows SDK classes, for example
Windows::Storage::Streams::IBufferByteAccess, use the ATL way of spelling
attributes:
[uuid("....")] class IBufferByteAccess {};
To be able to use __uuidof() to grab the uuid off these types, clang needs to
support uuid as a Microsoft attribute. There was already code to skip Microsoft
attributes, extend that to look for uuid and parse it. Use the new "Microsoft"
attribute type added in r280575 (and r280574, r280576) for this.
Final part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280578
There was already a function that moved attributes off the declspec into
an attribute list for attributes applying to the type, teach that function to
also move Microsoft attributes around and rename it to match its new broader
role.
Nothing uses Microsoft attributes yet, so no behavior change.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280576
into ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal() (which is called by
MaybeParseMicrosoftAttributes()), so that the attributes can be stored in
the DeclSpec. No behavior change yet, part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280574
The comment starting with "ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition -" is above
a function called ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal. Fix the comment by not
mentioning a function name, like the style guide requests nowadays. No behavior
change.
llvm-svn: 280572
r280133. Original commit message:
C++ Modules TS: driver support for building modules.
This works as follows: we add --precompile to the existing gamut of options for
specifying how far to go when compiling an input (-E, -c, -S, etc.). This flag
specifies that an input is taken to the precompilation step and no further, and
this can be specified when building a .pcm from a module interface or when
building a .pch from a header file.
The .cppm extension (and some related extensions) are implicitly recognized as
C++ module interface files. If --precompile is /not/ specified, the file is
compiled (via a .pcm) to a .o file containing the code for the module (and then
potentially also assembled and linked, if -S, -c, etc. are not specified). We
do not yet suppress the emission of object code for other users of the module
interface, so for now this will only work if everything in the .cppm file has
vague linkage.
As with the existing support for module-map modules, prebuilt modules can be
provided as compiler inputs either via the -fmodule-file= command-line argument
or via files named ModuleName.pcm in one of the directories specified via
-fprebuilt-module-path=.
This also exposes the -fmodules-ts cc1 flag in the driver. This is still
experimental, and in particular, the concrete syntax is subject to change as
the Modules TS evolves in the C++ committee. Unlike -fmodules, this flag does
not enable support for implicitly loading module maps nor building modules via
the module cache, but those features can be turned on separately and used in
conjunction with the Modules TS support.
llvm-svn: 280134
This works as follows: we add --precompile to the existing gamut of options for
specifying how far to go when compiling an input (-E, -c, -S, etc.). This flag
specifies that an input is taken to the precompilation step and no further, and
this can be specified when building a .pcm from a module interface or when
building a .pch from a header file.
The .cppm extension (and some related extensions) are implicitly recognized as
C++ module interface files. If --precompile is /not/ specified, the file is
compiled (via a .pcm) to a .o file containing the code for the module (and then
potentially also assembled and linked, if -S, -c, etc. are not specified). We
do not yet suppress the emission of object code for other users of the module
interface, so for now this will only work if everything in the .cppm file has
vague linkage.
As with the existing support for module-map modules, prebuilt modules can be
provided as compiler inputs either via the -fmodule-file= command-line argument
or via files named ModuleName.pcm in one of the directories specified via
-fprebuilt-module-path=.
This also exposes the -fmodules-ts cc1 flag in the driver. This is still
experimental, and in particular, the concrete syntax is subject to change as
the Modules TS evolves in the C++ committee. Unlike -fmodules, this flag does
not enable support for implicitly loading module maps nor building modules via
the module cache, but those features can be turned on separately and used in
conjunction with the Modules TS support.
llvm-svn: 280035
from p0273r0 approved by EWG). We'll eventually need to handle this from the
lexer as well, in order to disallow preprocessor directives preceding the
module declaration and to support macro import.
llvm-svn: 279196
This reverts commit r279003 as it breaks some of our buildbots (e.g.
clang-cmake-aarch64-quick, clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules).
The error is in OpenMP/teams_distribute_simd_ast_print.cpp:
clang: /home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-aarch64-quick/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:527:
bool llvm::DenseMapBase<DerivedT, KeyT, ValueT, KeyInfoT, BucketT>::LookupBucketFor(const LookupKeyT&, const BucketT*&) const
[with LookupKeyT = clang::Stmt*; DerivedT = llvm::DenseMap<clang::Stmt*, long unsigned int>;
KeyT = clang::Stmt*; ValueT = long unsigned int;
KeyInfoT = llvm::DenseMapInfo<clang::Stmt*>;
BucketT = llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<clang::Stmt*, long unsigned int>]:
Assertion `!KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, EmptyKey) && !KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, TombstoneKey) &&
"Empty/Tombstone value shouldn't be inserted into map!"' failed.
llvm-svn: 279045
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'teams distribute simd’ pragma.
This patch is originated by Carlo Bertolli.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23528
llvm-svn: 279003
Functions of Sema that work with building of nested name specifiers have too
many parameters (BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier already expects 10 arguments).
With this change the information about identifier and its context is packed
into a structure, which is then passes to the semantic functions.
llvm-svn: 277976
The recent change implementing __final forgot to initialize a variable.
This was caught by the Memory Sanitizer.
Properly initialize the value to nullptr to ensure proper memory reads.
Patch by Erich Keane!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22970
llvm-svn: 277206
As reported in bug 28473, GCC supports "final" functionality in pre-C++11 code using the __final keyword. Clang currently supports the "final" keyword in accordance with the C++11 specification, however it ALSO supports it in pre-C++11 mode, with a warning.
This patch adds the "__final" keyword for compatibility with GCC in GCC Keywords mode (so it is enabled with existing flags), and issues a warning on its usage (suggesting switching to the C++11 keyword). This patch also adds a regression test for the functionality described. I believe this patch has minimal impact, as it simply adds a new keyword for existing behavior.
This has been validated with check-clang to avoid regressions. Patch is created in reference to revisions 276665.
Patch by Erich Keane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22919
llvm-svn: 277134
Reid Kleckner