Summary:
This allows the client to resolve subtypes one level at a time.
For supertypes, this is not necessary, because we eagerly compute
supertypes and return all levels.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
llvm-svn: 365986
Summary:
This allows the client to resolve subtypes one level at a time.
For supertypes, this is not necessary, because we eagerly compute
supertypes and return all levels.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
llvm-svn: 365867
Summary:
This would allow clangd embedders to use the ClangdServer::rename for other
purposes (highlighting all the occurrences of the symbol in prepare
stage).
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64481
llvm-svn: 365631
Summary:
I didn't manage to find something nicer than optional<bool>, but at least I
found a sneakier comment.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64216
llvm-svn: 365356
Summary:
Some custom toolchains come with their own header files and compiler
drivers. Those compiler drivers implicitly know about include search path for
those headers. This patch aims to extract that information from drivers and add
it to the command line when invoking clang frontend.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62804
llvm-svn: 364389
Summary:
This introduces a few new concepts:
- tweaks have an Intent (they don't all advertise as refactorings)
- tweaks may produce messages (for ShowMessage notification). Generalized
Replacements -> Effect.
- tweaks (and other features) may be hidden (clangd -hidden-features flag).
We may choose to promote these one day. I'm not sure they're worth their own
feature flags though.
Verified it in vim-clangd (not yet open source), curious if the UI is ok in VSCode.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62538
llvm-svn: 363680
Summary:
Instead of `tooling::Replacements`. So that embedders do not need to store
the contents of the file.
This also aligns better with `ClangdServer::rename`.
Reviewers: kadircet, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63140
llvm-svn: 363150
Summary:
The existing implementation (which triggers on }) is fairly simple and
has flaws:
- doesn't trigger frequently/regularly enough (particularly in editors that type the }
for you)
- often reformats too much code around the edit
- has jarring cases that I don't have clear ideas for fixing
This implementation is designed to trigger on newline, which feels to me more
intuitive than } or ;.
It does have allow for reformatting after other characters - it has a
basic behavior and a model for adding specialized behavior for
particular characters. But at least initially I'd stick to advertising
\n in the capabilities.
This also handles comment splitting: when you insert a line break inside
a line comment, it will make the new line into an aligned line comment.
Working on tests, but want people to patch it in and try it - it's hard to
see if "feel" is right purely by looking at a test.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60605
llvm-svn: 362939
Summary:
We currently return an error, this causes `coc.nvim` and VSCode to
show an error message in the logs.
Returning empty list of completions allows to avod the error message
without altering other user-visible behavior.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62999
llvm-svn: 362811
Summary:
Change ClangdServer layer to output a structured response for Hover,
which can be rendered by client according to their needs.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61497
llvm-svn: 361803
Summary: We already have the structure internally, we just need to expose it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60267
llvm-svn: 358675
Summary:
Instead of tooling::Replacement. To avoid the need to have contents of
the file at the caller site. This also aligns better with other methods
in ClangdServer, majority of those already return LSP-specific data
types.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60179
llvm-svn: 357561
Summary:
Still some pieces to go here: unit tests for new SourceCode functionality and
a command-line flag to force utf-8 mode. But wanted to get early feedback.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275
llvm-svn: 357102
Summary:
The LSP clients cannot know clangd will not send diagnostic updates
for closed files, so we send them an empty list of diagnostics to
avoid showing stale diagnostics for closed files in the UI, e.g. in the
"Problems" pane of VSCode.
Fixes PR41217.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59757
llvm-svn: 356880
Summary:
This helps minimize the disruption of not returning declarations as part of
a find-definition response (r352864).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57580
llvm-svn: 352953
Summary:
LSP now reflects the declaration/definition distinction.
Language server changes:
- textDocument/definition now returns a definition if one is found, otherwise
the declaration. It no longer returns declaration + definition if they are
distinct.
- textDocument/declaration returns the best declaration we can find.
- For macros, the active macro definition is returned for both methods.
- For include directive, the top of the target file is returned for both.
There doesn't appear to be a discovery mechanism (we can't return everything to
clients that only know about definition), so this changes existing behavior.
In practice, it should greatly reduce the fraction of the time we need to show
the user a menu of options.
C++ API changes:
- findDefinitions is replaced by locateSymbolAt, which returns a
vector<LocatedSymbol> - one for each symbol under the cursor.
- this contains the preferred declaration, the definition (if found), and
the symbol name
This API enables some potentially-neat extensions, like swapping between decl
and def, and exposing the symbol name to the UI in the case of multiple symbols.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57388
llvm-svn: 352864
This should not happen in normal operation, as it implies that the diagnostics
with some available fixes were produced but the AST is invalid.
Moreover, the code had an error: always returned code actions ignoring the
SupportsCodeAction capability and writing a test for this is impossible,
since this can only happen due to programmer's error rather than invalid inputs.
llvm-svn: 352624
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
Summary:
This patch adds some basic supports for clang-tidy configurations in clangd:
- clangd will respect .clang-tidy configurations for each file
- we don't aim to support all clang-tidy options in clangd, only a
small subset of condfigurations (options related to which checks will be
enabled) are supported.
- add a `clang-tidy-checks` CLI option that can override options from
.clang-tidy file
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55256
llvm-svn: 351792
Summary:
Some projects make use of clang plugins when building, but clangd is
not aware of those plugins therefore can't work with the same compile command
arguments.
There were multiple places clangd performed commandline manipulations,
this one also moves them all into OverlayCDB.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, sammccall, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56841
llvm-svn: 351788
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Summary:
Only run completion when we were trigerred on '->' and '::', otherwise
send an error code in return.
To avoid automatically invoking completions in cases like 'a >^' or
'a ? b :^'.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55994
llvm-svn: 350304
Summary:
File paths in URIForFile can come from index or local AST. Path from
index goes through URI transformation and the final path is resolved by URI
scheme and could be potentially different from the original path. Hence, we
should do the same transformation for all paths. We do this in URIForFile, which
now converts a path to URI and back to a canonicalized path.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54845
llvm-svn: 347739
New method returning symbol info for given source position.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54799
rdar://problem/46050281
llvm-svn: 347675
Summary:
Ownership and configuration:
The auto-index (background index) is maintained by ClangdServer, like Dynamic.
(This means ClangdServer will be able to enqueue preamble indexing in future).
For now it's enabled by a simple boolean flag in ClangdServer::Options, but
we probably want to eventually allow injecting the storage strategy.
New 'sync' command:
In order to meaningfully test the integration (not just unit-test components)
we need a way for tests to ensure the asynchronous index reads/writes occur
before a certain point.
Because these tests and assertions are few, I think exposing an explicit "sync"
command for use in tests is simpler than allowing threading to be completely
disabled in the background index (as we do for TUScheduler).
Bugs:
I fixed a couple of trivial bugs I found while testing, but there's one I can't.
JSONCompilationDatabase::getAllFiles() may return relative paths, and currently
we trigger an assertion that assumes they are absolute.
There's no efficient way to resolve them (you have to retrieve the corresponding
command and then resolve against its directory property). In general I think
this behavior is broken and we should fix it in JSONCompilationDatabase and
require CompilationDatabase::getAllFiles() to be absolute.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54894
llvm-svn: 347567
Summary:
Instead of passing around a list of supported URI schemes in clangd, we
expose an interface to convert a path to URI using any compatible scheme
that has been registered. It favors customized schemes and falls
back to "file" when no other scheme works.
Changes in this patch are:
- URI::create(AbsPath, URISchemes) -> URI::create(AbsPath). The new API finds a
compatible scheme from the registry.
- Remove URISchemes option everywhere (ClangdServer, SymbolCollecter, FileIndex etc).
- Unit tests will use "unittest" by default.
- Move "test" scheme from ClangdLSPServer to ClangdMain.cpp, and only
register the test scheme when lit-test or enable-lit-scheme is set.
(The new flag is added to make lit protocol.test work; I wonder if there
is alternative here.)
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54800
llvm-svn: 347467
Summary:
This allows customizing the flags used when no compile database is
available. It addresses some uses of the old extraFlags extension.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53688
llvm-svn: 345973
Summary:
The new implementation is a GlobalCompilationDatabase that overlays a base.
Normally this is the directory-based CDB.
To preserve the behavior of compile_args_from=LSP, the base may be null.
The OverlayCDB is always present, and so the extensions to populate it
are always supported.
It also allows overriding the flags of the fallback command. This is
just unit-tested for now, but the plan is to expose this as an extension
on the initialize message. This addresses use cases like
https://github.com/thomasjo/atom-ide-cpp/issues/16
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53687
llvm-svn: 345970
Summary:
This was added in D34947 to support YCM, but YCM actually provides *all* args,
and this was never actually used.
Meanwhile, we grew another extension that allows specifying all args.
I did find one user of this extension: https://github.com/thomasjo/atom-ide-cpp.
I'll reach out, there are multiple good alternatives:
- compile_commands.txt can serve the same purpose as .clang_complete there
- we can add an extension to support setting the fallback command
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53641
llvm-svn: 345969
- align struct names/comments with LSP, remove redundant "clangd" prefixes.
- don't map config structs as Optional<> when their presence/absence
doesn't signal anything and all fields must have sensible "absent" values
- be more lax around parsing of 'any'-typed messages
llvm-svn: 345235
Haojian Wu