Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
CJ Johnson 69cd776e1e [CodeGen] Apply 'nonnull' and 'dereferenceable(N)' to 'this' pointer
arguments.

* Adds 'nonnull' and 'dereferenceable(N)' to 'this' pointer arguments
* Gates 'nonnull' on -f(no-)delete-null-pointer-checks
* Introduces this-nonnull.cpp and microsoft-abi-this-nullable.cpp tests to
  explicitly test the behavior of this change
* Refactors hundreds of over-constrained clang tests to permit these
  attributes, where needed
* Updates Clang12 patch notes mentioning this change

Reviewed-by: rsmith, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17993
2020-11-16 17:39:17 -08:00
Reid Kleckner b8a50e9207 [MS] Simplify rules for passing C++ records
Regardless of the target architecture, we should always use the C rules
(RAA_Default) for records that "canBePassedInRegisters". Those are
trivially copyable things, and things marked with [[trivial_abi]].

This should be NFC, although it changes where the final decision about
x86_32 overaligned records is made. The current x86_32 C rules say that
overaligned things are passed indirectly, so there is no functional
difference.
2020-09-24 16:29:47 -07:00
Reid Kleckner 3b3a165485 [MS] On x86_32, pass overaligned, non-copyable arguments indirectly
This updates the C++ ABI argument classification code to use the logic
from D72114, fixing an ABI incompatibility with MSVC.

Part of PR44395.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87923
2020-09-21 11:49:17 -07:00
Reid Kleckner 2c6a3896ab Re-land "[MS] Overhaul how clang passes overaligned args on x86_32"
This brings back 2af74e27ed and reverts
eaabaf7e04.

The changes were correct, the code that was broken contained an ODR
violation that assumed that these types are passed equivalently:
  struct alignas(uint64_t) Wrapper { uint64_t P };
  void f(uint64_t p);
  void f(Wrapper p);

MSVC does not pass them the same way, and so clang-cl should not pass
them the same way either.
2020-02-11 16:49:28 -08:00
Hans Wennborg eaabaf7e04 Revert "[MS] Overhaul how clang passes overaligned args on x86_32"
It broke some Chromium tests, so let's revert until it can be fixed; see
https://crbug.com/1046362

This reverts commit 2af74e27ed.
2020-01-28 22:25:07 +01:00
Reid Kleckner 2af74e27ed [MS] Overhaul how clang passes overaligned args on x86_32
MSVC 2013 would refuse to pass highly aligned things (typically vectors
and aggregates) by value. Users would receive this error:
  t.cpp(11) : error C2719: 'w': formal parameter with __declspec(align('32')) won't be aligned
  t.cpp(11) : error C2719: 'q': formal parameter with __declspec(align('32')) won't be aligned

However, in MSVC 2015, this behavior was changed, and highly aligned
things are now passed indirectly. To avoid breaking backwards
incompatibility, objects that do not have a *required* high alignment
(i.e. double) are still passed directly, even though they are not
naturally aligned. This change implements the new behavior of passing
things indirectly.

The new behavior is:
- up to three vector parameters can be passed in [XYZ]MM0-2
- remaining arguments with required alignment greater than 4 bytes are
  passed indirectly

Previously, MSVC never passed things truly indirectly, meaning clang
would always apply the byval attribute to indirect arguments. We had to
go to the trouble of adding inalloca so that non-trivially copyable C++
types could be passed in place without copying the object
representation. When inalloca was added, we asserted that all arguments
passed indirectly must use byval. With this change, that assert no
longer holds, and I had to update inalloca to handle that case. The
implicit sret pointer parameter was already handled this way, and this
change generalizes some of that logic to arguments.

There are two cases that this change leaves unfixed:
1. objects that are non-trivially copyable *and* overaligned
2. vectorcall + inalloca + vectors

For case 1, I need to touch C++ ABI code in MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp, so I
want to do it in a follow-up.

For case 2, my fix is one line, but it will require updating IR tests to
use lots of inreg, so I wanted to separate it out.

Related to D71915 and D72110

Fixes most of PR44395

Reviewed By: rjmccall, craig.topper, erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72114
2020-01-23 16:04:00 -08:00