Emit error for use of 128-bit integer inside device code had been
already implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D74387. However,
the error is not emitted for SPIR64, because for SPIR64, hasInt128Type
return true.
hasInt128Type: is also used to control generation of certain 128-bit
predefined macros, initializer predefined 128-bit integer types and
build 128-bit ArithmeticTypes. Except predefined macros, only the
device target is considered, since error only emit when 128-bit
integer is used inside device code, the host target (auxtarget) also
needs to be considered.
The change address:
1. (SPIR.h) Correct hasInt128Type() for SPIR targets.
2. Sema.cpp and SemaOverload.cpp: Add additional check to consider host
target(auxtarget) when call to hasInt128Type. So that __int128_t
and __int128() are allowed to avoid error when they used outside
device code.
3. SemaType.cpp: add check for SYCLIsDevice to delay the error message.
The error will be emitted if the use of 128-bit integer in the device
code.
Reviewed By: Johannes Doerfert and Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92439
This is the result of an audit of all of the ABIs in clang to implement
and enable the type for those targets.
Additionally, this finds an issue with integer-promotion passing for a
few platforms when using _ExtInt of < int, so this also corrects that
resulting in signext/zeroext being on a params of those types in some
platforms.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79118
I'm currently auditing all of the calling convention implications of
_ExtInt for all platforms, so splitting them up into their own test will
make this a much easier task to organize.
Jennifer Yu