explicit about the operands. Split out the different variants into separate
instructions. This gives us the ability to, among other things, assign
different scheduling itineraries to the variants. rdar://8477752.
llvm-svn: 117409
comments explaining why it was wrong. 8225024.
Fix the real problem in 8213383: the code that splits very large
blocks when no other place to put constants can be found was not
considering the case that the block contained a Thumb tablejump.
llvm-svn: 109282
ARM/PPC/MSP430-specific code (which are the only targets that
implement the hook) can directly reference their target-specific
instrinfo classes.
llvm-svn: 109171
mov pc, r1
.align 2
LJTI0_0_0:
.long LBB0_14
This fixes rdar://8213383. No test case since it's not possible to come up with a suitable small one.
llvm-svn: 109076
address calculation instructions leading up to a jump table when we're trying
to convert them into a TB[H] instruction in Thumb2. This realistically
shouldn't happen much, if at all, for well formed inputs, but it's more correct
to handle it. rdar://7387682
llvm-svn: 107830
writebacks to the address register. This gets rid of the hack that the
first register on the list was the magic writeback register operand. There
was an implicit constraint that if that operand was not reg0 it had to match
the base register operand. The post-RA scheduler's antidependency breaker
did not understand that constraint and sometimes changed one without the
other. This also fixes Radar 7495976 and should help the verifier work
better for ARM code.
There are now new ld/st instructions explicit writeback operands and explicit
constraints that tie those registers together.
llvm-svn: 98409
into TargetOpcodes.h. #include the new TargetOpcodes.h
into MachineInstr. Add new inline accessors (like isPHI())
to MachineInstr, and start using them throughout the
codebase.
llvm-svn: 95687
constant pool ranges, as CPEIsInRange() makes conservative assumptions about
the potential alignment changes from branch adjustments. The verification,
on the other hand, runs after those branch adjustments are made, so the
effects on alignment are known and already taken into account. The sanity
check in verify should check the range directly instead.
llvm-svn: 89473
assembly can confuse things utterly, as it's assumed that instructions in
inline assembly are 4 bytes wide. For Thumb mode, that's often not true,
so the calculations for when alignment padding will be present get thrown off,
ultimately leading to out of range constant pool entry references. Making
more conservative assumptions that padding may be necessary when inline asm
is present avoids this situation.
llvm-svn: 89403
can only branch forward. To best take advantage of them, we'd like to adjust
the basic blocks around a bit when reasonable. This patch puts basics in place
to do that, with a super-simple algorithm for backwards jump table targets that
creates a new branch after the jump table which branches backwards. Real
heuristics for reordering blocks or other modifications rather than inserting
branches will follow.
llvm-svn: 86791
In the case where there are no good places to put constants and we fall back
upon inserting unconditional branches to make new blocks, allow all constant
pool references in range of those blocks to put constants there, even if that
means resetting the "high water marks" for those references. This will still
terminate because you can't keep splitting blocks forever, and in the bad
cases where we have to split blocks, it is important to avoid splitting more
than necessary.
llvm-svn: 84202
When ARMConstantIslandPass cannot find any good locations (i.e., "water") to
place constants, it falls back to inserting unconditional branches to make a
place to put them. My recent change exposed a problem in this area. We may
sometimes append to the same block more than one unconditional branch. The
symptoms of this are that the generated assembly has a branch to an undefined
label and running llc with -debug will cause a seg fault.
This happens more easily since my change to prevent CPEs from moving from
lower to higher addresses as the algorithm iterates, but it could have
happened before. The end of the block may be in range for various constant
pool references, but the insertion point for new CPEs is not right at the end
of the block -- it is at the end of the CPEs that have already been placed
at the end of the block. The insertion point could be out of range. When
that happens, the fallback code will always append another unconditional
branch if the end of the block is in range.
The fix is to only append an unconditional branch if the block does not
already end with one. I also removed a check to see if the constant pool load
instruction is at the end of the block, since that is redundant with
checking if the end of the block is in-range.
There is more to be done here, but I think this fixes the immediate problem.
llvm-svn: 84172
Owen Anderson