Summary:
This test is broken on wndows 64-bit.
The interception library is not able to hook on the memchr functions.
Snippet of the function that is not hookable:
```
--- No source file -------------------------------------------------------------
000007FEFA1A18CD CC int 3
000007FEFA1A18CE CC int 3
000007FEFA1A18CF CC int 3
--- f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\string\amd64_arm_arm64\memchr.c ------------
while ( cnt && (*(unsigned char *)buf != (unsigned char)chr) ) {
000007FEFA1A18D0 4D 85 C0 test r8,r8
000007FEFA1A18D3 74 0D je memchr+12h (07FEFA1A18E2h)
000007FEFA1A18D5 38 11 cmp byte ptr [rcx],dl
000007FEFA1A18D7 74 09 je memchr+12h (07FEFA1A18E2h)
buf = (unsigned char *)buf + 1;
000007FEFA1A18D9 48 FF C1 inc rcx
cnt--;
000007FEFA1A18DC 49 83 E8 01 sub r8,1
000007FEFA1A18E0 75 F3 jne memchr+5h (07FEFA1A18D5h)
}
```
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: kubabrecka, dberris, llvm-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25037
llvm-svn: 282860
Summary:
On windows, the memcpy and memmove function can be the same.
This is correcly detected when hooking, but it's not possible
to report the right function name when doing symbolisation.
The same fix was applied for the static asan unittest.
We forgot to apply the fix for the dynamic asan tests.
```
lvm\projects\compiler-rt\test\asan/TestCases/Windows/.svn/text-base/intercept_memcpy.cc.svn-base:// CHECK-NEXT: __asan_{{.*}}mem{{.*}}
```
This patch is fixing this test (win64):
```
ddressSanitizer-x86_64-windows-dynamic :: TestCases/Windows/dll_intercept_memcpy_indirect.cc
```
Reviewers: rnk, vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka, chrisha, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25038
llvm-svn: 282859
Summary:
This change adds the AVR assembly instruction printer.
No tests are included in this patch. I have left them downstream so we can
add them once `llc` successfully runs (there's very few components left
to upstream until this).
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, beanz, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25028
llvm-svn: 282854
The code generator always adds unconditional LoadInst and StoreInst, hence the
MemoryAccess must be defined over all statement instances.
llvm-svn: 282853
Summary:
Previously, when allocating unspillable live ranges, we would never
attempt to split. We would always bail out and try last ditch graph
recoloring.
This patch changes this by attempting to split all live intervals before
performing recoloring.
This fixes LLVM bug PR14879.
I can't add test cases for any backends other than AVR because none of
them have small enough register classes to trigger the bug.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25070
llvm-svn: 282852
We would crash when a non-alloca section pointed to a gced part of a
merge section.
That can happen when a C/c++ constant in put in a merge section and
debug info is present.
llvm-svn: 282845
When LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is used and LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_TOOLS
contains a tool which is a symlink, it would be ignored. This already
worked before but got broken in r282510.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25067
llvm-svn: 282844
I'm not completely sure what this method does or why all the 256-bit VTs returned VR128RegClass when the comments on the method definiton say it should return the largest super register class. I just figured AVX-512 should be similar.
llvm-svn: 282836
If AVX512 is disabled, the registers should already be marked reserved. Pattern predicates and register classes on instructions should take care of most of the rest. Loads/stores and physical register copies for XMM16-31 and YMM16-31 without VLX have already been taken care of.
I'm a little unclear why this changed the register allocation of the SSE2 run of the sad.ll test, but the registers selected appear to be valid after this change.
llvm-svn: 282835
Summary:
We don't want to decay hot callsites to import chains of hot
callsites. The same mechanism is used in LIPO.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24976
llvm-svn: 282833
For some reason there are both of these available, except
for scalar 64-bit compares which only has u64. I'm not sure
why there are both (I'm guessing it's for the one bit inputs we
don't use), but for consistency always using the
unsigned one.
llvm-svn: 282832
Summary:
This lets people link against LLVM and their own version of the UTF
library.
I determined this only affects llvm, clang, lld, and lldb by running
$ git grep -wl 'UTF[0-9]\+\|\bConvertUTF\bisLegalUTF\|getNumBytesFor' | cut -f 1 -d '/' | sort | uniq
clang
lld
lldb
llvm
Tested with
ninja lldb
ninja check-clang check-llvm check-lld
(ninja check-lldb doesn't complete for me with or without this patch.)
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: klimek, beanz, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24996
llvm-svn: 282822
We were implicitly creating space for the headers. That is not the
behaviour of bfd, which requires the script to use SIZEOF_HEADERS. The
difference is important for scripts that don't use SIZEOF_HEADERS and
expect the first section to be at 0.
llvm-svn: 282818
This uses a TableGen'ed like structure for all 3-operands instrs.
The output of the RegBankSelect pass should be identical but the
RegisterBankInfo will do less dynamic allocations.
llvm-svn: 282817
Currently lld will implicitly reserve space for the headers. This is
not the case is bfd, where it is the script responsibility to use
SIZEOF_HEADERS. This means that a script not using SIZEOF_HEADERS and
expecting the address of the first section to be 0 would fail with lld.
I am fixing that is the next commit. This one just makes the tests
explicitly use SIZEOF_HEADERS to avoid the dependency on the current
behaviour.
llvm-svn: 282814
(Recommit after making sure IsVerbose gets properly initialized in
DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase. See previous commit that takes care of
this.)
OptimizationRemarkAnalysis directly takes the role of the report that is
generated by LAA.
Then we need the magic to be able to turn an LAA remark into an LV
remark. This is done via a new OptimizationRemark ctor.
llvm-svn: 282813
Etienne Bergeron