Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth ec7ad6561f Move llvm/Support/MDBuilder.h to llvm/MDBuilder.h, to live with
IRBuilder, DIBuilder, etc.

This is the proper layering as MDBuilder can't be used (or implemented)
without the Core Metadata representation.

Patches to Clang and Dragonegg coming up.

llvm-svn: 160237
2012-07-15 23:26:50 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 65e75666ff Add support for branch weight metadata to MDBuilder and use it in various places.
llvm-svn: 157515
2012-05-26 13:59:43 +00:00
Stepan Dyatkovskiy 97b02fc1b3 llvm::SwitchInst
Renamed methods caseBegin, caseEnd and caseDefault with case_begin, case_end, and case_default.
Added some notes relative to case iterators.

llvm-svn: 152532
2012-03-11 06:09:17 +00:00
Stepan Dyatkovskiy 5b648afb4d Taken into account Duncan's comments for r149481 dated by 2nd Feb 2012:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120130/136146.html

Implemented CaseIterator and it solves almost all described issues: we don't need to mix operand/case/successor indexing anymore. Base iterator class is implemented as a template since it may be initialized either from "const SwitchInst*" or from "SwitchInst*".

ConstCaseIt is just a read-only iterator.
CaseIt is read-write iterator; it allows to change case successor and case value.

Usage of iterator allows totally remove resolveXXXX methods. All indexing convertions done automatically inside the iterator's getters.

Main way of iterator usage looks like this:
SwitchInst *SI = ... // intialize it somehow

for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->caseBegin(), e = SI->caseEnd(); i != e; ++i) {
  BasicBlock *BB = i.getCaseSuccessor();
  ConstantInt *V = i.getCaseValue();
  // Do something.
}

If you want to convert case number to TerminatorInst successor index, just use getSuccessorIndex iterator's method.
If you want initialize iterator from TerminatorInst successor index, use CaseIt::fromSuccessorIndex(...) method.

There are also related changes in llvm-clients: klee and clang.

llvm-svn: 152297
2012-03-08 07:06:20 +00:00
Stepan Dyatkovskiy 513aaa5691 SwitchInst refactoring.
The purpose of refactoring is to hide operand roles from SwitchInst user (programmer). If you want to play with operands directly, probably you will need lower level methods than SwitchInst ones (TerminatorInst or may be User). After this patch we can reorganize SwitchInst operands and successors as we want.

What was done:

1. Changed semantics of index inside the getCaseValue method:
getCaseValue(0) means "get first case", not a condition. Use getCondition() if you want to resolve the condition. I propose don't mix SwitchInst case indexing with low level indexing (TI successors indexing, User's operands indexing), since it may be dangerous.
2. By the same reason findCaseValue(ConstantInt*) returns actual number of case value. 0 means first case, not default. If there is no case with given value, ErrorIndex will returned.
3. Added getCaseSuccessor method. I propose to avoid usage of TerminatorInst::getSuccessor if you want to resolve case successor BB. Use getCaseSuccessor instead, since internal SwitchInst organization of operands/successors is hidden and may be changed in any moment.
4. Added resolveSuccessorIndex and resolveCaseIndex. The main purpose of these methods is to see how case successors are really mapped in TerminatorInst.
4.1 "resolveSuccessorIndex" was created if you need to level down from SwitchInst to TerminatorInst. It returns TerminatorInst's successor index for given case successor.
4.2 "resolveCaseIndex" converts low level successors index to case index that curresponds to the given successor.

Note: There are also related compatability fix patches for dragonegg, klee, llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, safecode, clang.
llvm-svn: 149481
2012-02-01 07:49:51 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 47e1db1e59 Add a proper LLVM banner to this file.
llvm-svn: 142162
2011-10-16 22:15:07 +00:00
Chris Lattner 229907cd11 land David Blaikie's patch to de-constify Type, with a few tweaks.
llvm-svn: 135375
2011-07-18 04:54:35 +00:00
Frits van Bommel bbe46f28b1 No need to explicitly invoke the ArrayRef constructor here.
llvm-svn: 135281
2011-07-15 17:13:23 +00:00
Jakub Staszak a11f7ecbf8 Fix a bug in the "expect" intrinsic lowering.
llvm-svn: 134566
2011-07-06 23:50:16 +00:00
Jakub Staszak 3f158fdf6e Introduce "expect" intrinsic instructions.
llvm-svn: 134516
2011-07-06 18:22:43 +00:00