The main change is to add a 'IsDecl' field to DIModule so
that when IsDecl is set to true, the debug info entry generated
for the module would be marked as a declaration. That way, the debugger
would look up the definition of the module in the gloabl scope.
Please see the comments in llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dimodule.ll
for what the debug info entries would look like.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93462
This patch extends DIModule Debug metadata in LLVM to support
Fortran modules. DIModule is extended to contain File and Line
fields, these fields will be used by Flang FE to create debug
information necessary for representing Fortran modules at IR level.
Furthermore DW_TAG_module is also extended to contain these fields.
If these fields are missing, debuggers like GDB won't be able to
show Fortran modules information correctly.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79484
In order for dsymutil to collect .apinotes files (which capture
attributes such as nullability, Swift import names, and availability),
I want to propose adding an apinotes: field to DIModule that gets
translated into a DW_AT_LLVM_apinotes (path) nested inside
DW_TAG_module. This will be primarily used by LLDB to indirectly
extract the Swift names of Clang declarations that were deserialized
from DWARF.
<rdar://problem/59514626>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75585
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
It is meant to be used to record modules @imported by the current
compile unit, so a debugger an import the same modules to replicate this
environment before dropping into the expression evaluator.
DIModule is a sibling to DINamespace and behaves quite similarly.
In addition to the name of the module it also records the module
configuration details that are necessary to uniquely identify the module.
This includes the configuration macros (e.g., -DNDEBUG), the include path
where the module.map file is to be found, and the isysroot.
The idea is that the backend will turn this into a DW_TAG_module.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9614
rdar://problem/20965932
llvm-svn: 241017
Chih-Ping Chen