the alignment is clamped to TargetFrameLowering.getStackAlignment if the target
does not support stack realignment or the option "realign-stack" is off.
This will cause miscompile if the address is treated as aligned and add is
replaced with or in DAGCombine.
Added a bool StackRealignable to TargetFrameLowering to check whether stack
realignment is implemented for the target. Also added a bool RealignOption
to MachineFrameInfo to check whether the option "realign-stack" is on.
rdar://12713765
llvm-svn: 169197
Now that there can be multiple hint registers from targets, it doesn't
make sense to have a function that returns 'the' preferred register.
llvm-svn: 169190
Targets can provide multiple hints now, so getRegAllocPref() doesn't
make sense any longer because it only returns one preferred register.
Replace it with getSimpleHint() in the remaining heuristics. This
function only
llvm-svn: 169188
Virtual registers with a known preferred register are prioritized by
RAGreedy. This function makes the condition explicit without depending
on getRegAllocPref().
llvm-svn: 169179
The TargetRegisterInfo::getRegAllocationHints() function is going to
replace the existing mechanisms for providing target-dependent hints to
the register allocator: ResolveRegAllocHint() and
getRawAllocationOrder().
The new hook is more flexible because it allows the target to provide
multiple preferred candidate registers for each virtual register, and it
is easier to use because targets are not required to return a reference
to a constant array like getRawAllocationOrder().
An optional VirtRegMap argument can be used to provide target-dependent
hints that depend on the provisional assignments of other virtual
registers.
llvm-svn: 169154
AKA: Recompile *ALL* the source code!
This one went much better. No manual edits here. I spot-checked for
silliness and grep-checked for really broken edits and everything seemed
good. It all still compiles. Yell if you see something that looks goofy.
llvm-svn: 169133
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
The original patch removed a bunch of code that the SjLjEHPrepare pass placed
into the entry block if all of the landing pads were removed during the
CodeGenPrepare class. The more natural way of doing things is to run the CGP
*before* we run the SjLjEHPrepare pass.
Make it so!
llvm-svn: 169044
Rationale:
1) This was the name in the comment block. ;]
2) It matches Clang's __has_feature naming convention.
3) It matches other compiler-feature-test conventions.
Sorry for the noise. =]
I've also switch the comment block to use a \brief tag and not duplicate
the name.
llvm-svn: 168996
references from whether it supports an R-value reference *this. No
version of GCC today supports the latter, which breaks GCC C++11
compiles of LLVM and Clang now.
Also add doxygen comments clarifying what's going on here, and update
the usage in Optional. I'll update the usages in Clang next.
llvm-svn: 168993
For example, don't allow empty strings to be passed to getInt.
Move asserts inside parseSpecifier. (One day we may want to pass parse
error messages to the user - from LLParser - instead of using asserts,
but keep the code simple until then. There have been an attempt to do
this. See r142288, which got reverted, and r142605.)
llvm-svn: 168991
depends on the IR infrastructure, there is no sense in it being off in
Support land.
This is in preparation to start working to expand InstVisitor into more
special-purpose visitors that are still generic and can be re-used
across different passes. The expansion will go into the Analylis tree
though as nothing in VMCore needs it.
llvm-svn: 168972
This expands to '&', and is intended to be used when an /optional/ rvalue
override is available.
Before:
void foo() const { ... }
After:
void foo() const LLVM_LVALUE_FUNCTION { ... }
void foo() && { ... }
This is used to allow moving the contents of an Optional.
llvm-svn: 168963
This revision attempts to recognize following population-count pattern:
while(a) { c++; ... ; a &= a - 1; ... },
where <c> and <a>could be used multiple times in the loop body.
TODO: On X8664 and ARM, __buildin_ctpop() are not expanded to a efficent
instruction sequence, which need to be improved in the following commits.
Reviewed by Nadav, really appreciate!
llvm-svn: 168931
MachOObjectFile owns a MachOObj, but never frees it. Both MachOObjectFile
and MachOObj want to own the MemoryBuffer, though, so we have to be careful
and give them each one of their own.
Thanks to Greg Clayton, Eric Christopher and Michael Spencer for helping
figure out what's going wrong here.
rdar://12561773
llvm-svn: 168923
No functional change, just moved header files.
Targets can inject custom passes between register allocation and
rewriting. This makes it possible to tweak the register allocation
before rewriting, using the full global interference checking available
from LiveRegMatrix.
llvm-svn: 168806
appropriate unit tests. This change in itself is not expected to
affect any functionality at this point, but it will serve as a
stepping stone to improve FileCheck's variable matching capabilities.
Luckily, our regex implementation already supports backreferences,
although a bit of hacking is required to enable it. It supports both
Basic Regular Expressions (BREs) and Extended Regular Expressions
(EREs), without supporting backrefs for EREs, following POSIX strictly
in this respect. And EREs is what we actually use (rightly). This is
contrary to many implementations (including the default on Linux) of
POSIX regexes, that do allow backrefs in EREs.
Adding backref support to our EREs is a very simple change in the
regcomp parsing code. I fail to think of significant cases where it
would clash with existing things, and can bring more versatility to
the regexes we write. There's always the danger of a backref in a
specially crafted regex causing exponential matching times, but since
we mainly use them for testing purposes I don't think it's a big
problem. [it can also be placed behind a flag specific to FileCheck,
if needed].
For more details, see:
* http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-November/055840.html
* http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121126/156878.html
llvm-svn: 168802
This is a simple, cheap infrastructure for analyzing the shape of a
DAG. It recognizes uniform DAGs that take the shape of bottom-up
subtrees, such as the included matrix multiplication example. This is
useful for heuristics that balance register pressure with ILP. Two
canonical expressions of the heuristic are implemented in scheduling
modes: -misched-ilpmin and -misched-ilpmax.
llvm-svn: 168773
Manman Ren