diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
in addition to underlying type.
For example, the warning for printf("%zu", 42.0);
changes from "conversion specifies type 'unsigned long'" to "conversion
specifies type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long')"
(This is a second attempt after r145697, which got reverted.)
llvm-svn: 146032
The code had it backwards, thinking size_t was signed, and using that for "%zd".
Also let the analysis get the types for (u)intmax_t while we are at it.
llvm-svn: 143099
Hans Wennborg