Now with concepts support merged and mostly complete, we do not need -fconcepts-ts
(which was also misleading as we were not implementing the TS) and can enable
concepts features under C++2a. A warning will be generated if users still attempt
to use -fconcepts-ts.
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
render the function deleted instead of rendering the program ill-formed.
This change also adds an enabled-by-default warning for the case where
an explicitly-defaulted special member function of a non-template class
is implicitly deleted by the type checking rules. (This fires either due
to this language change or due to pre-C++20 reasons for the member being
implicitly deleted). I've tested this on a large codebase and found only
bugs (where the program means something that's clearly different from
what the programmer intended), so this is enabled by default, but we
should revisit this if there are problems with this being enabled by
default.
llvm-svn: 343285
Add a warning for shadowed variables across records. Referencing a
shadow'ed variable may not give the desired variable. Add an optional
warning for the shadowing.
Patch by James Sun!
llvm-svn: 294401
constructs that can do so into the initialization code. This fixes a number
of different cases in which we used to fail to check for abstract types.
Thanks to Tim Shen for inspiring the weird code that uncovered this!
llvm-svn: 289753
This CL has caused bootstrap failures on Linux and OSX buildbots running with -Werror.
Example report from http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/13183/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio:
================================================================
[ 91%] Building CXX object tools/clang/tools/diagtool/CMakeFiles/diagtool.dir/ShowEnabledWarnings.cpp.o
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelDAGToDAG.cpp:20:
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h:19:
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIInstrInfo.h:71:8: error: 'getLdStBaseRegImmOfs' overrides a member function but is not marked 'override' [-Werror,-Winconsistent-missing-override]
bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
^
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h:815:16: note: overridden virtual function is here
virtual bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
^
================================================================
llvm-svn: 218969
for an overriding method if class has at least one
'override' specified on one of its methods.
Reviewed by Doug Gregor. rdar://18295240
(I have already checked in all llvm files with missing 'override'
methods and Bob Wilson has fixed a TableGen of FastISel so
no warnings are expected from build of llvm after this patch.
I have already verified this).
llvm-svn: 218925
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.
Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).
llvm-svn: 193969
Consider something like the following:
struct X {
virtual void foo(float x);
};
struct Y : X {
void foo(double x) override;
};
The error is almost certainly that Y::foo() has the wrong signature,
rather than incorrect usage of the override keyword. This patch
adds an appropriate diagnostic for that case.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14785106>.
llvm-svn: 190109
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
and defined within the current instantiation, but which are not part of the
current instantiation. Previously, it would look at bases which could be
specialized separately from the current template.
llvm-svn: 168477
we know whether the function is virtual. But check it as soon as we do know;
in some cases we don't need to wait for an instantiation.
llvm-svn: 161316
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
members in class subobjects of different types. So long as the
underlying declaration sets are the same, and the declaration sets
involve non-instance members, this is not an ambiguity.
llvm-svn: 117163
function within a class hierarchy (C++ [class.virtual]p2).
We use the final-overrider computation to determine when a particular
class is ill-formed because it has multiple final overriders for a
given virtual function (e.g., because two virtual functions override
the same virtual function in the same virtual base class). Fixes
PR5973.
We also use the final-overrider computation to determine which virtual
member functions are pure when determining whether a class is
abstract or diagnosing the improper use of an abstract class. The
prior approach to determining whether there were any pure virtual
functions in a class didn't cope with virtual base class subobjects
properly, and could not easily be fixed to deal with the oddities of
subobject hiding. Fixes PR6631.
llvm-svn: 99351
nested-name-specifier. For example, this allows member access in
diamond-shaped hierarchies like:
struct Base {
void Foo();
int Member;
};
struct D1 : public Base {};
struct D2 : public Base {};
struct Derived : public D1, public D2 { }
void Test(Derived d) {
d.Member = 17; // error: ambiguous cast from Derived to Base
d.D1::Member = 17; // error: okay, modify D1's Base's Member
}
Fixes PR5820 and <rdar://problem/7535045>. Also, eliminate some
redundancy between Sema::PerformObjectMemberConversion() and
Sema::PerformObjectArgumentInitialization() -- the latter now calls
the former.
llvm-svn: 97674
that are hidden by other derived base subobjects reached along a
lookup path that does *not* pass through the hiding subobject (C++
[class.member.lookup]p6). Fixes PR6462.
llvm-svn: 97640
Sema::getTypeName.
"LookupNestedNameSpecifierName" isn't quite the right kind of lookup, though;
it doesn't ignore namespaces. Someone more familiar with the lookup code
should fix this properly.
llvm-svn: 91809
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
name, e.g.,
x->Base::f()
retain the qualifier (and its source range information) in a new
subclass of MemberExpr called CXXQualifiedMemberExpr. Provide
construction, transformation, profiling, printing, etc., for this new
expression type.
When a virtual function is called via a qualified name, don't emit a
virtual call. Instead, call that function directly. Mike, could you
add a CodeGen test for this, too?
llvm-svn: 80167
Saar Raz