CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
This bug (llvm.org/PR28124) was introduced by r237977, which refactored
the tail call sequence to be generated in two passes instead of one.
Unfortunately, the stack adjustment produced by the first pass was not
recognized by X86FrameLowering::mergeSPUpdates() in all cases, causing
code such as the following, which clobbers the return address, to be
generated:
popl %edi
popl %edi
pushl %eax
jmp tailcallee # TAILCALL
To fix the problem, the entire stack adjustment is performed in
X86ExpandPseudo::ExpandMI() for tail calls.
Patch by Magnus Lång <margnus1@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21325
llvm-svn: 275103
X86FrameLowering::adjustForHiPEPrologue() contains a hard-coded offset
into an Erlang Runtime System-internal data structure (the PCB). As the
layout of this data structure is prone to change, this poses problems
for maintaining compatibility.
To address this problem, the compiler can produce this information as
module-level named metadata. For example (where P_NSP_LIMIT is the
offending offset):
!hipe.literals = !{ !2, !3, !4 }
!2 = !{ !"P_NSP_LIMIT", i32 152 }
!3 = !{ !"X86_LEAF_WORDS", i32 24 }
!4 = !{ !"AMD64_LEAF_WORDS", i32 24 }
Patch by Magnus Lang
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20363
llvm-svn: 273593
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
This changes the SelectionDAG scheduling preference to source
order. Soon, the SelectionDAG scheduler can be bypassed saving
a nice chunk of compile time.
Performance differences that result from this change are often a
consequence of register coalescing. The register coalescer is far from
perfect. Bugs can be filed for deficiencies.
On x86 SandyBridge/Haswell, the source order schedule is often
preserved, particularly for small blocks.
Register pressure is generally improved over the SD scheduler's ILP
mode. However, we are still able to handle large blocks that require
latency hiding, unlike the SD scheduler's BURR mode. MI scheduler also
attempts to discover the critical path in single-block loops and
adjust heuristics accordingly.
The MI scheduler relies on the new machine model. This is currently
unimplemented for AVX, so we may not be generating the best code yet.
Unit tests are updated so they don't depend on SD scheduling heuristics.
llvm-svn: 192750
Daniel Jasper