This addresses post review comment for D92018.
The warning was:
```
error: loop variable 'Note' is always a copy because the range of type 'iterator_range<llvm::object::ELFFile<llvm::object::ELFType<llvm::support::big, true> >::Elf_Note_Iterator>' (aka 'iterator_range<Elf_Note_Iterator_Impl<ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0U, true> > >') does not return a reference [-Werror,-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const typename ELFT::Note &Note : Obj.notes(S, Err))
```
A piece of code in `isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond` basically duplicates
the dominators traversal from `isBlockEntryGuardedByCond` called from
`isKnownPredicateAt`, but it's less powerful because it does not give context
to `isImpliedCond`. This patch reuses the `isKnownPredicateAt `function there,
reducing the amount of code duplication and making it more powerful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
Reviewed By: skatkov
Use more context to prove contextual facts about the last iteration. It is
only executed when the backedge is taken, so we can use `isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`
to make this check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91535
Reviewed By: skatkov
LoopLoadElim may end up expanding an AddRec from a loop
which is not the current loop. This loop may not be in simplify
form. We figure it out after the no-return point, so cannot bail
in this case.
AddRec requires simplify form to expand. The only way to ensure
this does not crash is to simplify all loops beforehand.
The issue only exists in new PM. Old PM requests LoopSimplify
required pass and it simplifies all loops before the opt begins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91525
Reviewed By: asbirlea, aeubanks
Without this extra flag we can't distingish between stub functions and
functions that happen to have address 0 (relative to __table_base).
Adding this flag bit the base symbol class actually avoids growing the
SymbolUnion struct which would not be true if we added it to the
FunctionSymbol subclass (due to bitbacking).
The previous approach of setting it's table index to zero worked for
normal static relocations but not for `-fPIC` code.
See https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/12819
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92038
This change gives sparse compiler clients more control over selecting
individual types for the pointers and indices in the sparse storage schemes.
Narrower width obviously results in smaller memory footprints, but the
range should always suffice for the maximum number of entries or index value.
Reviewed By: penpornk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92126
same type in multiple base classes.
Not even if the type is introduced by distinct declarations (for
example, two typedef declarations, or a typedef and a class definition).
Define ConstantData::PoisonValue.
Add support for poison value to LLLexer/LLParser/BitcodeReader/BitcodeWriter.
Add support for poison value to llvm-c interface.
Add support for poison value to OCaml binding.
Add m_Poison in PatternMatch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71126
This is partly in preparation for an upcoming change that can change the
order in which DeclContext lookup results are presented.
In passing, fix some obvious errors where name lookup's notion of a
"static member function" missed static member function templates, and
where its notion of "same set of declarations" was confused by the same
declarations appearing in a different order.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D89072 I added static const data members
to the debug subsection for globals. It skipped emitting an S_CONSTANT if it
didn't have a value, which meant the subsection could be empty.
This patch fixes the empty subsection issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92049
Revert "[compiler-rt] [builtins] Support conversion between fp16 and fp128" & dependency
Revert "[compiler-rt] [builtins] Use _Float16 on extendhfsf2, truncdfhf2 __truncsfhf2 if available"
This reverts commit 7a94829881.
This reverts commit 1fb91fcf9c.
Start with an assumption that FMA is faster than Fmul+FAdd. If thats not true
on some particular implementation we can add a tuning parameter in the future.
I've update the fmuladd test cases and added new test cases for fast math flag
based contraction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91987
We currently don't match this which limits the effectiveness of D91120 until
InstCombine starts canonicalizing to llvm.abs. This should be easy to remove
if/when we remove the SPF_ABS handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92118
In text-item contexts, %expr expands to a string containing the results of evaluating `expr`.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89736
This is the logically correct thing to do. But it generates worse
code for i32 umin/umax on the rv64 due to type legalize requesting
zext even though the arguments are sext. Maybe we can teach type
legalizer to use sext for umin/umax for RISCV.
It's also producing possibly worse code on i64 on RV32 since we
still end up with selects that become branches. But this seems
like something we could improve in type legalization or DAG combine.
Hopefully this makes D92095 work for RISCV with Zbb.
There were a couple of places where we needed to call the underlying
platform's aligned allocation/deallocation function. Instead of having
the same logic all over the place, extract the logic into a pair of
helper functions __libcpp_aligned_alloc and __libcpp_aligned_free.
The code in libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp looks like it could be
simplified after this change -- I purposefully did not simplify it
further to keep this change as straightforward as possible, since it
is touching very important parts of the library.
Also, the changes in libcxx/src/new.cpp and libcxxabi/src/stdlib_new_delete.cpp
are basically the same -- I just kept both source files in sync.
The underlying reason for this refactoring is to make it easier to support
platforms that provide aligned allocation through C11's aligned_alloc
function instead of posix_memalign. After this change, we'll only have
to add support for that in a single place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91379
Adding missing custom builders for AffineVectorLoadOp & AffineVectorStoreOp. In practice, it is difficult to correctly construct these ops without these builders (because the AffineMap is not included at construction time).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86380
This code got quite twisted because we consider some MSVC builtins to be
target agnostic, and some to be target specific. Target specific
intrinsics have a pattern of doing up-front argument evaluation, while
general intrinsics do not evaluate their arguments up front. As we tried
to share codepaths between the target-specific and target-agnostic
handling, we ended up doing double evaluation.
Instead, have each target handle MSVC intrinsics consistently before up
front argument evaluation. This requires passing less data around and is
more consistent with target independent intrinsic handling.
See D50979 for past examples of this bug. I noticed this while looking
into adding some more intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92061
This should handle the basic integer min/max handling - the HVX ops are still TODO.
This is some necessary cleanup work for min/max ops to eventually help us move the add/sub sat patterns into DAGCombine - D91876.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92112
Update costs now that D92095 and D92102 have tweaked the SSE2 implementation
The SSE42 BLENDVPD cost can actually be used on SSE41 as we don't attempt to generate PCMPGT anymore
Add scalar i16/i32/i64 costs as we can do this cheaply with CMOV
Added some new ClangTidyOptionsProvider like classes designed for clangd work flow.
These providers are designed to source the options on the worker thread but in a thread safe manner.
This is done through making the options getter take a pointer to the filesystem used by the worker thread which natuarally is from a ThreadsafeFS.
Internal caching in the providers is also guarded.
The providers don't inherit from `ClangTidyOptionsProvider` instead they share a base class which is able to create a provider for the `ClangTidyContext` using a specific FileSystem.
This approach means one provider can be used for multiple contexts even though `ClangTidyContext` owns its provider.
Depends on D90531
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91029
Local values are constants or addresses that can't be folded into
the instruction that uses them. FastISel materializes these in a
"local value" area that always dominates the current insertion
point, to try to avoid materializing these values more than once
(per block).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093 added code to sink these local
value instructions to their first use, which has two beneficial
effects. One, it is likely to avoid some unnecessary spills and
reloads; two, it allows us to attach the debug location of the
user to the local value instruction. The latter effect can
improve the debugging experience for debuggers with a "set next
statement" feature, such as the Visual Studio debugger and PS4
debugger, because instructions to set up constants for a given
statement will be associated with the appropriate source line.
There are also some constants (primarily addresses) that could be
produced by no-op casts or GEP instructions; the main difference
from "local value" instructions is that these are values from
separate IR instructions, and therefore could have multiple users
across multiple basic blocks. D43093 avoided sinking these, even
though they were emitted to the same "local value" area as the
other instructions. The patch comment for D43093 states:
Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the
register to the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups
map direction, we don't have enough information to sink these
instructions.
This patch undoes most of D43093, and instead flushes the local
value map after(*) every IR instruction, using that instruction's
debug location. This avoids sometimes incorrect locations used
previously, and emits instructions in a more natural order.
This does mean materialized values are not re-used across IR
instruction boundaries; however, only about 5% of those values
were reused in an experimental self-build of clang.
(*) Actually, just prior to the next instruction. It seems like
it would be cleaner the other way, but I was having trouble
getting that to work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91734
This adds custom opcodes for FSLW/FSRW so we can type legalize
fshl/fshr without needing to match a sign_extend_inreg.
I've used the operand order from fshl/fshr to make the isel
pattern similar to the non-W form. It was also hard to decide
another order since the register instruction has the shift amount
as the second operand, but the immediate instruction has it as
the third operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91479
This is an alternative approach to address inconsistencies pointed out in: D90078
This patch makes sure that the return address is reset, when leaving the scope.
In some cases, I had to move the macro out of an if-statement to have it in the
right scope, in some cases I added an additional block to restrict the scope.
This patch does not handle inconsistencies, which might occur if the return
address is still set when we call into the application.
Test case (repeated_calls.c) provided by @hbae
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91692
OpenMP 5.1 introduces the new env variable
OMP_TOOL_VERBOSE_INIT=(disabled|stdout|stderr|<filename>) to enable verbose
loading and initialization of OMPT tools.
This env variable helps to understand the cause when loading of a tool fails
(e.g., undefined symbols or dependency not in LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
Output of OMP_TOOL_VERBOSE_INIT is added for OMP_DISPLAY_ENV
Tests for this patch are integrated into the different existing tool loading
tests, making these tests more verbose. An Archer specific verbose test is
integrated into an existing Archer test.
Patch prepared by: Isabel Thärigen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91464