This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
This recommits r327206, which was reverted because it caused
module-enabled builders to fail. I discovered that the
CXXRecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters flag wasn't being set correctly in
some cases after I moved it to RecordDecl.
Thanks to Eric Liu for helping me investigate the bug.
rdar://problem/33599681
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327870
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327206
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
The 'trivial_abi' attribute can be applied to a C++ class, struct, or
union. It makes special functions of the annotated class (the destructor
and copy/move constructors) to be trivial for the purpose of calls and,
as a result, enables the annotated class or containing classes to be
passed or returned using the C ABI for the underlying type.
When a type that is considered trivial for the purpose of calls despite
having a non-trivial destructor (which happens only when the class type
or one of its subobjects is a 'trivial_abi' class) is passed to a
function, the callee is responsible for destroying the object.
For more background, see the discussions that took place on the mailing
list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/055955.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180101/thread.html#214043
rdar://problem/35204524
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039
llvm-svn: 324269
Attempting to recompute it are doomed to fail because the IDNS of a declaration
is not necessarily preserved across serialization and deserialization (in turn
because whether a friend declaration is visible depends on whether some prior
non-friend declaration exists).
llvm-svn: 321921
This feature is not (yet) approved by the C++ committee, so this is liable to
be reverted or significantly modified based on committee feedback.
No functionality change intended for existing code (a new type must be defined
in namespace std to take advantage of this feature).
llvm-svn: 315662
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.
llvm-svn: 315379
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
Apparently, the MSVC SDK has a strange implementation that
causes a number of implicit functions as well as a template member
function of the IUnknown type. This patch allows these as InterfaceLike
types as well.
Additionally, it corrects the behavior where extern-C++ wrapped around an
Interface-Like type would permit an interface-like type to exist in a namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38303
llvm-svn: 314557
It was brought up in response to my last implementation for
this struct-as-interface features that at least 1 header in
the MS SDK uses "extern C++" around an IUnknown declaration.
The previous implementation demanded that this type exist
in the TranslationUnit DeclContext. This small change simply
also allows in the situation where we're extern "C++".
llvm-svn: 314235
__interface objects in MSVC are permitted to inherit from __interface types,
and interface-like types.
Additionally, there are two default interface-like types
(IUnknown and IDispatch) that all interface-like
types must inherit from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37308
llvm-svn: 313364
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
the class becoming complete and its inline methods being parsed.
This replaces the hack of using the "late parsed template" flag to track member
functions with bodies we've not parsed yet; instead we now use the "will have
body" flag, which carries the desired implication that the function declaration
*is* a definition, and that we've just not parsed its body yet.
llvm-svn: 310776
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
devirtualized.
The code to detect devirtualized calls is already in IRGen, so move the
code to lib/AST and make it a shared utility between Sema and IRGen.
This commit fixes a linkage error I was seeing when compiling the
following code:
$ cat test1.cpp
struct Base {
virtual void operator()() {}
};
template<class T>
struct Derived final : Base {
void operator()() override {}
};
Derived<int> *d;
int main() {
if (d)
(*d)();
return 0;
}
rdar://problem/33195657
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34301
llvm-svn: 307883
Summary:
This patch aims to fix the bug reported at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33189. Clang hits an assertion
when a template destructor declaration is present. This is caused by
later processing that does not expect to encounter a template when
looking at a destructor. The resolution is to treat the destructor as
being not declared when later processing is interested in the properties
of the destructor of a class.
Reviewers: rcraik, hubert.reinterpretcast, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33833
Patch by Kuang He!
llvm-svn: 306905
When looking for the template instantiation pattern of a templated entity,
consistently select the definition of the pattern if there is one. This means
we'll pick the same owning module when we start instantiating a template that
we'll later pick when determining which modules are visible during that
instantiation.
This reinstates r300650, reverted in r300659, with a fix for a regression
reported by Chandler after commit.
llvm-svn: 300938
modules but exposes much more widespread issues. Example and more
information is on the review thread for r300650.
Original commit summary:
[modules] Properly look up the owning module for an instantiation of a merged template.
llvm-svn: 300659
When looking for the template instantiation pattern of a templated entity,
consistently select the definition of the pattern if there is one. This means
we'll pick the same owning module when we start instantiating a template that
we'll later pick when determining which modules are visible during that
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 300650
Calculating the hash in Sema::ActOnTagFinishDefinition could happen before
all sub-Decls were parsed or processed, which would produce the wrong hash
value. Change to calculating the hash on the first use and storing the value
instead. Also, avoid using the macros that were only for Boolean fields and
use an explicit checker during the DefintionData merge. No functional change,
but was this blocking other ODRHash patches.
llvm-svn: 299989
Summary: When adding an Objective-C retainable type member to a C++ class, also check the LangOpts.ObjCWeak flag and the lifetime qualifier so __weak qualified Objective-C pointer members cause the class to be a non-POD type with non-trivial special members, so the compiler always emits the necessary runtime calls for copying, moving, and destroying the weak member. Otherwise, Objective-C++ classes with weak Objective-C pointer members compiled with -fobjc-weak exhibit undefined behavior if the C++ class is classified as a POD type.
Reviewers: rsmith, benlangmuir, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31003
llvm-svn: 299008
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
Add the basics for the ODRHash class, which will only process Decl's from
a whitelist, which currently only has AccessSpecDecl. Different access
specifiers in merged classes can now be detected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295800
Reserve a spot for ODR hash in CXXRecordDecl and in its modules storage.
Default the hash value to 0 for all classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295533
A slightly weaker form of ODR checking than previous attempts, but hopefully
won't break the modules build bot. Future work will be needed to catch all
cases.
When objects are imported for modules, there is a chance that a name collision
will cause an ODR violation. Previously, only a small number of such
violations were detected. This patch provides a stronger check based on
AST nodes.
The information needed to uniquely identify an object is taken from the AST and
put into a one-dimensional byte stream. This stream is then hashed to give
a value to represent the object, which is stored with the other object data
in the module.
When modules are loaded, and Decl's are merged, the hash values of the two
Decl's are compared. Only Decl's with matched hash values will be merged.
Mismatch hashes will generate a module error, and if possible, point to the
first difference between the two objects.
The transform from AST to byte stream is a modified depth first algorithm.
Due to references between some AST nodes, a pure depth first algorithm could
generate loops. For Stmt nodes, a straight depth first processing occurs.
For Type and Decl nodes, they are replaced with an index number and only on
first visit will these nodes be processed. As an optimization, boolean
values are saved and stored together in reverse order at the end of the
byte stream to lower the ammount of data that needs to be hashed.
Compile time impact was measured at 1.5-2.0% during module building, and
negligible during builds without module building.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295421
Recommit r293585 that was reverted in r293611 with new fixes. The previous
issue was determined to be an overly aggressive AST visitor from forward
declared objects. The visitor will now only deeply visit certain Decl's and
only do a shallow information extraction from all other Decl's.
When objects are imported for modules, there is a chance that a name collision
will cause an ODR violation. Previously, only a small number of such
violations were detected. This patch provides a stronger check based on
AST nodes.
The information needed to uniquely identify an object is taken from the AST and
put into a one-dimensional byte stream. This stream is then hashed to give
a value to represent the object, which is stored with the other object data
in the module.
When modules are loaded, and Decl's are merged, the hash values of the two
Decl's are compared. Only Decl's with matched hash values will be merged.
Mismatch hashes will generate a module error, and if possible, point to the
first difference between the two objects.
The transform from AST to byte stream is a modified depth first algorithm.
Due to references between some AST nodes, a pure depth first algorithm could
generate loops. For Stmt nodes, a straight depth first processing occurs.
For Type and Decl nodes, they are replaced with an index number and only on
first visit will these nodes be processed. As an optimization, boolean
values are saved and stored together in reverse order at the end of the
byte stream to lower the ammount of data that needs to be hashed.
Compile time impact was measured at 1.5-2.0% during module building, and
negligible during builds without module building.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 295284
We're seeing what we believe are false positives. (It's hard to tell with the
available diagnostics, and I'm not sure how to reduce them yet).
I'll send Richard reproduction details offline.
djasper/chandlerc suggested this should be a warning for now, to make rolling it
out feasible.
llvm-svn: 293611
When objects are imported for modules, there is a chance that a name collision
will cause an ODR violation. Previously, only a small number of such
violations were detected. This patch provides a stronger check based on
AST nodes.
The information needed to uniquely identify an object is taked from the AST and
put into a one-dimensional byte stream. This stream is then hashed to give
a value to represent the object, which is stored with the other object data
in the module.
When modules are loaded, and Decl's are merged, the hash values of the two
Decl's are compared. Only Decl's with matched hash values will be merged.
Mismatch hashes will generate a module error, and if possible, point to the
first difference between the two objects.
The transform from AST to byte stream is a modified depth first algorithm.
Due to references between some AST nodes, a pure depth first algorithm could
generate loops. For Stmt nodes, a straight depth first processing occurs.
For Type and Decl nodes, they are replaced with an index number and only on
first visit will these nodes be processed. As an optimization, boolean
values are saved and stored together in reverse order at the end of the
byte stream to lower the ammount of data that needs to be hashed.
Compile time impact was measured at 1.5-2.0% during module building, and
negligible during builds without module building.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21675
llvm-svn: 293585
effect they would have in C++11. In particular, they do not prevent
value-initialization from performing zero-initialization, nor do they prevent a
struct from being an aggregate.
llvm-svn: 290229
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
llvm-svn: 290203
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
llvm-svn: 290080
copy constructors of classes with array members, instead using
ArrayInitLoopExpr to represent the initialization loop.
This exposed a bug in the static analyzer where it was unable to differentiate
between zero-initialized and unknown array values, which has also been fixed
here.
llvm-svn: 289618
Summary:
The C++17 rules for aggregate initialization changed to disallow types with explicit constructors [dcl.init.aggr]p1. This patch implements that new rule.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25654
llvm-svn: 288565
anonymous union member of a class, we need overload resolution for the move
constructor of the class itself too; we can't rely on Sema to do the right
thing for us for anonymous union types.
llvm-svn: 278763
tuple-like decomposition declaration. This significantly simplifies the
semantics of BindingDecls for AST consumers (they can now always be evalated
at the point of use).
llvm-svn: 278640
decomposition declarations.
There are a couple of things in the wording that seem strange here:
decomposition declarations are permitted at namespace scope (which we partially
support here) and they are permitted as the declaration in a template (which we
reject).
llvm-svn: 276492
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
This implements support for MS-specific __unaligned qualifier in functions and
makes the following test case both compile and mangle correctly:
struct S {
void f() __unaligned;
};
void S::f() __unaligned {
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20437
llvm-svn: 270834
a base class via a using-declaration. If a class has a using-declaration
declaring either a constructor or an assignment operator, eagerly declare its
special members in case they need to displace a shadow declaration from a
using-declaration.
llvm-svn: 269398
r261297 called hasUserProvidedDefaultConstructor() to check if defining a
const object is ok. This is incorrect for this example:
struct X { template<typename ...T> X(T...); int n; };
const X x; // formerly OK, now bogus error
Instead, track if a class has a defaulted default constructor, and disallow
a const object for classes that either have defaulted default constructors or
if they need an implicit constructor.
Bug report and fix approach by Richard Smith, thanks!
llvm-svn: 261770
For templates, fields can have incomplete types:
template <class T>
struct A2 {
struct B;
B b;
};
Don't try to touch the DefinitionData of those fields.
llvm-svn: 261301
C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for
classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit default
constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and e.g.
libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This
change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' again
when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284).
Fixes PR23381.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
llvm-svn: 261297
keys, and PointerIntPairs where the pointee types are incomplete
out-of-line to where we have the complete type.
This is the standard pattern used throughout the AST library to address
the inherently mutually cross referenced nature of the AST.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256612
Also remove now-redundant explicit alignment specification on some of
the classes converted prior to TrailingObjects automatically ensuring
proper alignment.
llvm-svn: 256585
This lets us pass functors (and lambdas) without void * tricks. On the
downside we can't pass CXXRecordDecl's Find* members (which are now type
safe) to lookupInBases directly, but a lambda trampoline is a small
price to pay. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 243217
instantiation, use the set of modules visible from the template definition, not
from whichever declaration the specialization was instantiated from.
llvm-svn: 241662
When checking if a function is noreturn, consider a codepath to be noreturn if
the path destroys a class and the class destructor, base class destructors, or
member field destructors are marked noreturn.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9454
llvm-svn: 238382
Previously we'd deserialize the list of mem-initializers for a constructor when
we deserialized the declaration of the constructor. That could trigger a
significant amount of unnecessary work (pulling in all base classes
recursively, for a start) and was causing problems for the modules buildbot due
to cyclic deserializations. We now deserialize these on demand.
This creates a certain amount of duplication with the handling of
CXXBaseSpecifiers; I'll look into reducing that next.
llvm-svn: 233052
move the operator delete updating into a separate update record so we can cope
with updating another module's destructor's operator delete.
llvm-svn: 231735
invalidate lookup_iterators and lookup_results for some name within a
DeclContext if the lookup results for a *different* name change.
llvm-svn: 230121
This was causing some trouble for otherwise dead code removed in r225085
(reverted in r225361). The location being set for function arguments was
leaking out to the call which wasn't setting its own location (so a
quality bug turned into a crasher with r225085). Fix this so r225085 can
be recommitted.
llvm-svn: 226382
ignore it during overload resolution when initializing
X from a value of type cv X.
Previously, our rule here only ignored specializations
of constructor templates. That's probably because the
standard says that constructors are outright ill-formed
if their first parameter is literally X and they're
callable with one argument. However, Clang only
enforces that prohibition against non-implicit
instantiations; I'm not sure why, but it seems to be
deliberate. Given that, the most sensible thing to
do is to just ignore the "illegal" constructor
regardless of where it came from.
Also, stop ignoring such constructors silently:
print a note explaining why they're being ignored.
Fixes <rdar://19199836>.
llvm-svn: 224205
This moves some code from SemaType.cpp's hasVisibleDefinition() into
DeclCXX.cpp so that it can be used elsewhere. I found one other instance
of code trying to do the same thing, there are probably more. Search for
getInstantiatedFrom() to try to find more.
No functionality change.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5783
llvm-svn: 219714
If a base class declares a destructor, we will add the implicit
destructor for the subclass in
ActOnFields -> AddImplicitlyDeclaredMembersToClass
But in Objective C++, we did not compute whether we have a trivial
destructor until after that in
CXXRecordDecl::completeDefinition()
This was leading to a mismatch between the class, which thought it had
no trivial destructor, and the CXXDestructorDecl, which considered
itself trivial. It turns out the reason we delayed setting this until
completeDefinition() was for a warning that has since been removed as
part of -Warc-abi, so we just do it eagerly now.
llvm-svn: 218520
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
This field is never inspected in the object state initialized by this
constructor; however, initializing it seems reasonable, since it has
a meaningful value.
llvm-svn: 213499
CRTP-like patterns involve a class which inherits from another class
using itself as a template parameter.
However, the base class itself may try to create a pointer-to-member
which involves the derived class. This is problematic because we
may not have finished parsing the most derived classes' base specifiers
yet.
It turns out that MSVC simply uses the unspecified inheritance model
instead of doing anything fancy.
This fixes PR19987.
llvm-svn: 210886
ensure that querying the first declaration for its most recent declaration
checks for redeclarations from the imported module.
This works as follows:
* The 'most recent' pointer on a canonical declaration grows a pointer to the
external AST source and a generation number (space- and time-optimized for
the case where there is no external source).
* Each time the 'most recent' pointer is queried, if it has an external source,
we check whether it's up to date, and update it if not.
* The ancillary data stored on the canonical declaration is allocated lazily
to avoid filling it in for declarations that end up being non-canonical.
We'll still perform a redundant (ASTContext) allocation if someone asks for
the most recent declaration from a decl before setPreviousDecl is called,
but such cases are probably all bugs, and are now easy to find.
Some finessing is still in order here -- in particular, we use a very general
mechanism for handling the DefinitionData pointer on CXXRecordData, and a more
targeted approach would be more compact.
Also, the MayHaveOutOfDateDef mechanism should now be expunged, since it was
addressing only a corner of the full problem space here. That's not covered
by this patch.
Early performance benchmarks show that this makes no measurable difference to
Clang performance without modules enabled (and fixes a major correctness issue
with modules enabled). I'll revert if a full performance comparison shows any
problems.
llvm-svn: 209046
Lift the getFunctionDecl() utility out of the parser into a general
Decl::getAsFunction() and use it to simplify other parts of the implementation.
Reduce isFunctionOrFunctionTemplate() to a simple type check that works the
same was as the other is* functions and move unwrapping of shadowed decls to
callers so it doesn't get run twice.
Shuffle around canSkipFunctionBody() to reduce virtual dispatch on ASTConsumer.
There's no need to query when we already know the body can't be skipped.
llvm-svn: 199794
more than one such initializer in a union, make mem-initializers override
default initializers for other union members, handle anonymous unions with
anonymous struct members better. Fix a couple of semi-related bugs exposed by
the tests for same.
llvm-svn: 196892
can't accidentally be allocated the wrong way (missing prefix data for decls
from AST files, for instance) and simplifies the CreateDeserialized functions a
little. An extra DeclContext* parameter to the not-from-AST-file operator new
allows us to ensure that we don't accidentally call the wrong one when
deserializing (when we don't have a DeclContext), allows some extra checks, and
prepares for some planned modules-related changes to Decl allocation.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 195426
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.
Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).
llvm-svn: 193969
A prior commit of this patch was reverted because it was within the blamelist's purview of a failing test. The failure of that test has been addressed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091546.html. Therefore I am recommitting this patch (all tests pass on windows, except for the usual modules & index suspects that never pass on my box).
Some background: Both Doug and Richard had asked me in Chicago to remove the circular reference in CXXRecordDecl to LambdaExpr by factoring out and storing the needed information from LambdaExpr directly into CXXRecordDecl.
In addition, I have added an IsGenericLambda flag - this makes life a little easier when we implement capturing, and are Sema-analyzing the body of a lambda (and the calloperator hasn't been wired to the closure class yet). Any inner lambdas can have potential captures that could require walking up the scope chain and checking if any generic lambdas are capture-ready. This 'bit' makes some of that checking easier.
No change in functionality.
This patch was approved by Doug with minor modifications (comments were cleaned up, and all data members were converted from bool/enum to unsigned, as requested):
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1856
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193246
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
Both Doug and Richard had asked me to remove the circular reference in CXXRecordDecl to LambdaExpr by factoring out and storing the needed information from LambdaExpr directly into CXXRecordDecl.
No change in functionality.
In addition, I have added an IsGenericLambda flag - this makes life a little easier when we implement capturing, and are Sema-analyzing the body of a lambda (and the calloperator hasn't been wired to the closure class yet). Any inner lambdas can have potential captures that could require walking up the scope chain and checking if any generic lambdas are capture-ready. This 'bit' makes some of that checking easier.
This patch was approved by Doug with minor modifications (comments were cleaned up, and all data members were converted from bool/enum to unsigned, as requested):
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1856
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193223
Summary:
Operator new, new[], delete, and delete[] are all implicitly static when
declared inside a record. CXXMethodDecl already knows this, but we need
to account for that before we pick the calling convention for the
function type.
Fixes PR17371.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1761
llvm-svn: 192150
The general strategy is to create template versions of the conversion function and static invoker and then during template argument deduction of the conversion function, create the corresponding call-operator and static invoker specializations, and when the conversion function is marked referenced generate the body of the conversion function using the corresponding static-invoker specialization. Similarly, Codegen does something similar - when asked to emit the IR for a specialized static invoker of a generic lambda, it forwards emission to the corresponding call operator.
This patch has been reviewed in person both by Doug and Richard. Richard gave me the LGTM.
A few minor changes:
- per Richard's request i added a simple check to gracefully inform that captures (init, explicit or default) have not been added to generic lambdas just yet (instead of the assertion violation).
- I removed a few lines of code that added the call operators instantiated parameters to the currentinstantiationscope. Not only did it not handle parameter packs, but it is more relevant in the patch for nested lambdas which will follow this one, and fix that problem more comprehensively.
- Doug had commented that the original implementation strategy of using the TypeSourceInfo of the call operator to create the static-invoker was flawed and allowed const as a member qualifier to creep into the type of the static-invoker. I currently kludge around it - but after my initial discussion with Doug, with a follow up session with Richard, I have added a FIXME so that a more elegant solution that involves the use of TrivialTypeSourceInfo call followed by the correct wiring of the template parameters to the functionprototypeloc is forthcoming.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 191634
Specifically, the following features are not included in this commit:
- any sort of capturing within generic lambdas
- generic lambdas within template functions and nested
within other generic lambdas
- conversion operator for captureless lambdas
- ensuring all visitors are generic lambda aware
(Although I have gotten some useful feedback on my patches of the above and will be incorporating that as I submit those patches for commit)
As an example of what compiles through this commit:
template <class F1, class F2>
struct overload : F1, F2 {
using F1::operator();
using F2::operator();
overload(F1 f1, F2 f2) : F1(f1), F2(f2) { }
};
auto Recursive = [](auto Self, auto h, auto ... rest) {
return 1 + Self(Self, rest...);
};
auto Base = [](auto Self, auto h) {
return 1;
};
overload<decltype(Base), decltype(Recursive)> O(Base, Recursive);
int num_params = O(O, 5, 3, "abc", 3.14, 'a');
Please see attached tests for more examples.
This patch has been reviewed by Doug and Richard. Minor changes (non-functionality affecting) have been made since both of them formally looked at it, but the changes involve removal of supernumerary return type deduction changes (since they are now redundant, with richard having committed a recent patch to address return type deduction for C++11 lambdas using C++14 semantics).
Some implementation notes:
- Add a new Declarator context => LambdaExprParameterContext to
clang::Declarator to allow the use of 'auto' in declaring generic
lambda parameters
- Add various helpers to CXXRecordDecl to facilitate identifying
and querying a closure class
- LambdaScopeInfo (which maintains the current lambda's Sema state)
was augmented to house the current depth of the template being
parsed (id est the Parser calls Sema::RecordParsingTemplateParameterDepth)
so that SemaType.cpp::ConvertDeclSpecToType may use it to immediately
generate a template-parameter-type when 'auto' is parsed in a generic
lambda parameter context. (i.e we do NOT use AutoType deduced to
a template parameter type - Richard seemed ok with this approach).
We encode that this template type was generated from an auto by simply
adding $auto to the name which can be used for better diagnostics if needed.
- SemaLambda.h was added to hold some common lambda utility
functions (this file is likely to grow ...)
- Teach Sema::ActOnStartOfFunctionDef to check whether it
is being called to instantiate a generic lambda's call
operator, and if so, push an appropriately prepared
LambdaScopeInfo object on the stack.
- various tests were added - but much more will be needed.
There is obviously more work to be done, and both Richard (weakly) and Doug (strongly)
have requested that LambdaExpr be removed form the CXXRecordDecl LambdaDefinitionaData
in a future patch which is forthcoming.
A greatful thanks to all reviewers including Eli Friedman, James Dennett,
and especially the two gracious wizards (Richard Smith and Doug Gregor)
who spent hours providing feedback (in person in Chicago and on the mailing lists).
And yet I am certain that I have allowed unidentified bugs to creep in; bugs, that I will do my best to slay, once identified!
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 191453
Summary: Closure classes for C++ lambdas are always compiler-generated. This one-line change calls setImplicit(true) on them at creation time, such that a default RecursiveASTVisitor (or any for which shouldVisitImplicitCode returns false) will skip them.
Reviewers: rsmith, dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
CC: klimek, revane, cfe-commits, jordan_rose
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1593
llvm-svn: 190073
Specifically, the following features are not included in this commit:
- any sort of capturing within generic lambdas
- nested lambdas
- conversion operator for captureless lambdas
- ensuring all visitors are generic lambda aware
As an example of what compiles:
template <class F1, class F2>
struct overload : F1, F2 {
using F1::operator();
using F2::operator();
overload(F1 f1, F2 f2) : F1(f1), F2(f2) { }
};
auto Recursive = [](auto Self, auto h, auto ... rest) {
return 1 + Self(Self, rest...);
};
auto Base = [](auto Self, auto h) {
return 1;
};
overload<decltype(Base), decltype(Recursive)> O(Base, Recursive);
int num_params = O(O, 5, 3, "abc", 3.14, 'a');
Please see attached tests for more examples.
Some implementation notes:
- Add a new Declarator context => LambdaExprParameterContext to
clang::Declarator to allow the use of 'auto' in declaring generic
lambda parameters
- Augment AutoType's constructor (similar to how variadic
template-type-parameters ala TemplateTypeParmDecl are implemented) to
accept an IsParameterPack to encode a generic lambda parameter pack.
- Add various helpers to CXXRecordDecl to facilitate identifying
and querying a closure class
- LambdaScopeInfo (which maintains the current lambda's Sema state)
was augmented to house the current depth of the template being
parsed (id est the Parser calls Sema::RecordParsingTemplateParameterDepth)
so that Sema::ActOnLambdaAutoParameter may use it to create the
appropriate list of corresponding TemplateTypeParmDecl for each
auto parameter identified within the generic lambda (also stored
within the current LambdaScopeInfo). Additionally,
a TemplateParameterList data-member was added to hold the invented
TemplateParameterList AST node which will be much more useful
once we teach TreeTransform how to transform generic lambdas.
- SemaLambda.h was added to hold some common lambda utility
functions (this file is likely to grow ...)
- Teach Sema::ActOnStartOfFunctionDef to check whether it
is being called to instantiate a generic lambda's call
operator, and if so, push an appropriately prepared
LambdaScopeInfo object on the stack.
- Teach Sema::ActOnStartOfLambdaDefinition to set the
return type of a lambda without a trailing return type
to 'auto' in C++1y mode, and teach the return type
deduction machinery in SemaStmt.cpp to process either
C++11 and C++14 lambda's correctly depending on the flag.
- various tests were added - but much more will be needed.
A greatful thanks to all reviewers including Eli Friedman,
James Dennett and the ever illuminating Richard Smith. And
yet I am certain that I have allowed unidentified bugs to creep in;
bugs, that I will do my best to slay, once identified!
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 188977
No functionality change.
In Sema helper functions:
* renamed isTypeName as HasTypenameKeyword
In UsingDecl:
* renamed get/setUsingLocation to get/setUsingLoc
* renamed is/setTypeName as has/setTypename
llvm-svn: 186816
A class with a field of non-POD-for-layout type is not POD-for-layout.
This computation should not depend on whether the field is of POD type
in the language sense.
Fixes PR16537.
Patch by Josh Magee.
llvm-svn: 186741
Make sure we don't crash when checking whether an assignment operator
without any arguments is a special member. <rdar://problem/14397774>.
llvm-svn: 186137
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
statement in constexpr functions. Everything which doesn't require variable
mutation is also allowed as an extension in C++11. 'void' becomes a literal
type to support constexpr functions which return 'void'.
llvm-svn: 180022
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in
CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer.
There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can
refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure
that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation.
llvm-svn: 179958
We keep the "as written" storage class, but that is a fuzzy concept for
instantiations. With this patch instantiations of methods of class templates
now get a storage class that is based on the semantics of isStatic(). With this
can simplify isStatic() itself.
llvm-svn: 179521
This slightly propagates an existing hack that delays when we provide
access specifiers for the visible conversion functions of a class by
copying the available access specifier early. The only client this
affects is LLDB, which tends to discover and add conversion functions
after the class is technically "complete". As such, the only
observable difference is in LLDB, so the testing will go there.
llvm-svn: 179029
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
visible.
The basic problem here is that a given translation unit can use
forward declarations to form pointers to a given type, say,
class X;
X *x;
and then import a module that includes a definition of X:
import XDef;
We will then fail when attempting to access a member of X, e.g.,
x->method()
because the AST reader did not know to look for a default of a class
named X within the new module.
This implementation is a bit of a C-centric hack, because the only
definitions that can have this property are enums, structs, unions,
Objective-C classes, and Objective-C protocols, and all of those are
either visible at the top-level or can't be defined later. Hence, we
can use the out-of-date-ness of the name and the identifier-update
mechanism to force the update.
In C++, we will not be so lucky, and will need a more advanced
solution, because the definitions could be in namespaces defined in
two different modules, e.g.,
// module 1
namespace N { struct X; }
// module 2
namespace N { struct X { /* ... */ }; }
One possible implementation here is for C++ to extend the information
associated with each identifier table to include the declaration IDs
of any definitions associated with that name, regardless of
context. We would have to eagerly load those definitions.
llvm-svn: 174794
Title: [PR9027] volatile struct bug: member is not loaded at -O;
This is caused by last flag passed to @llvm.memcpy being false,
not honoring that aggregate has at least one 'volatile' data member
(even though aggregate itself has not been qualified as 'volatile'.
As a result, optimization optimizes away the memcpy altogether.
Patch review by John MaCall (I still need to fix up a test though).
llvm-svn: 173535
This does limit these typedefs to being sequences, but no current usage
requires them to be contiguous (we could expand this to a more general
iterator pair range concept at some point).
Also, it'd be nice if SmallVector were constructible directly from an ArrayRef
but this is a bit tricky since ArrayRef depends on SmallVectorBaseImpl for the
inverse conversion. (& generalizing over all range-like things, while nice,
would require some nontrivial SFINAE I haven't thought about yet)
llvm-svn: 170482
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.
This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.
This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.
llvm-svn: 169667
properly, rather than faking it up by pretending that a reference member makes
the default constructor non-trivial. That leads to rejects-valids when putting
such types inside unions.
llvm-svn: 169662
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
constructor/assignment operator with a const-qualified parameter type. The
prior method for determining this incorrectly used overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 168775
allocated using the allocator associated with an ASTContext.
Use this inside CXXRecordDecl::DefinitionData instead of an UnresolvedSet to
avoid a potential memory leak.
rdar://12761275
llvm-svn: 168771
Separate out the notions of 'has a trivial special member' and 'has a
non-trivial special member', and use them appropriately. These are not
opposites of one another (there might be no special member, or in C++11 there
might be a trivial one and a non-trivial one). The CXXRecordDecl predicates
continue to produce incorrect results, but do so in fewer cases now, and
they document the cases where they might be wrong.
No functionality changes are intended here (they will come when the predicates
start producing the right answers...).
llvm-svn: 168119
non-trivial if they would not call a move operation, even if they would in fact
call a trivial copy operation. A proper fix is to follow, but this small
directed fix is intended for porting to the 3.2 release branch.
llvm-svn: 167920
definition info; it needs to be there because the mangler needs to
access it before we're finished defining the lambda class.
PR12808.
llvm-svn: 164186
Akira Hatanaka