Summary:
The refactoring has caused a failure in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux/builds/29265
The idea of failing the symbolization when the symbolizer bufer is too small
was incorrect. The symbolizer can be invoked for other frames that may fit into
the buffer and get symbolized.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, eugenis
Subscribers: dberris, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74343
Summary:
Nothing critical, just a few potential improvements I've noticed while reading
the code:
- return `false` when symbolizer buffer is too small to read all data
- invert some conditions to reduce indentation
- prefer `nullptr` over `0` for pointers; init some pointers on stack;
- remove minor code duplication
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Subscribers: dberris, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, kcc
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74137
On Darwin we have two external symbolizers: atos and llvm-symbolizer.
atos was changed to use posix_spawn (instead of fork+execv) in a
previous commit [1]. Let's use posix_spawn for llvm-symbolizer as well.
Our hope is that eventually we can transition to posix_spawn on other
platforms too.
[1] 399408a92f
llvm-svn: 369021
On Darwin, we currently use forkpty to communicate with the "atos"
symbolizer. There are several problems that fork[pty] has, e.g. that
after fork, interceptors are still active and this sometimes causes
crashes or hangs. This is especially problematic for TSan, which uses
interceptors for OS-provided locks and mutexes, and even Libc functions
use those.
This patch replaces forkpty with posix_spawn on Darwin. Since
posix_spawn doesn't fork (at least on Darwin), the interceptors are not
a problem. Another benefit is that we'll handle post-fork failures (e.g.
sandbox disallows "exec") gracefully now.
Related revisions and previous attempts that were blocked by or had to
be revered due to test failures:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48451https://reviews.llvm.org/D40032
Reviewed By: kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65253
llvm-svn: 368947
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D58620 for discussion, and for the commands
I ran. In addition I also ran
for f in $(svn diff | diffstat | grep .cc | cut -f 2 -d ' '); do rg $f . ; done
and manually updated (many) references to renamed files found by that.
llvm-svn: 367463
Vitaly Buka