Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krzysztof Parzyszek 9d35c1701f [docs] Set Phabricator as the tool for pre-commit reviews
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103811
2021-06-07 11:50:52 -05:00
Philip Reames 0918f44e26 [docs] Document our norms around reverts
This has come up a few times recently, and I was surprised to notice that we don't have anything in the docs.

This patch deliberately sticks to stuff that is uncontroversial in the community. Everything herein is thought to be widely agreed to by a large majority of the community.  A few things were noted and removed in review which failed this standard, if you spot anything else, please point it out.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305
2021-04-07 21:02:19 -07:00
Mehdi Amini 7d3e9578ca Make the post-commit review expectations more explicit with respect to revert
See  http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096529.html for
context.

Reviewed By: silvas, rengolin, echristo, dexonsmith, gribozavr2

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89995
2020-10-28 23:29:29 +00:00
Hal Finkel 4d0339aecb High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
This is an update to the documentation of our community code-review process.
Based on the RFC: High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-November/136808.html).

In this patch, I've pulled out the documentation into a separate file, and
broken it into a number of subsections. This is, of course, just one further
step in better documenting our community processes. I expect we'll continue to
improve this over time. Thank you to everyone who provided feedback!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71916
2020-03-07 04:20:18 +00:00