Pulled out of the original D90479 patch - also includes the "impossible shift amount" filtering from computeKnownBitsFromShiftOperator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90479
For loops of the form:
void foo(int *a, int *cond, short *inv, long long n) {
for (long long i=0; i<n; ++i) {
if (cond[i])
a[i] = *inv;
}
}
we can vectorise for SVE using masked gather loads where the array
of pointers is simply a vector splat of 'inv' and the mask comes
from the condition 'cond[i] != 0'.
This patch simply adds tests upstream to defend this capability.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98043
The check `tightlyNested()` in `LoopInterchange` is similar to the one in `LoopNest`.
In fact, the former misses some cases where loop-interchange is not feasible and results in incorrect behaviour.
Replacing it with the much robust version provided by `LoopNest` reduces code duplications and fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48113.
`LoopInterchange` has a weaker definition of tightly or perfectly nesting-ness than the one implemented in `LoopNest::arePerfectlyNested()`.
Therefore, `tightlyNested()` is instead implemented with `LoopNest::checkLoopsStructure` and additional checks for unsafe instructions.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97290
This reverts commit 99108c791d.
Clang is miscompiling LLVM with this change, a stage-2 build hits
multiple failures.
As a repro, I built clang in a stage1 directory and used it this way:
cmake -G Ninja ../llvm \
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=`pwd`/../build-stage1/bin/clang++ \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=`pwd`/../build-stage1/bin/clang \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;NVPTX;AMDGPU" \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=mlir \
-DLLVM_BUILD_EXAMPLES=ON \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On
ninja check-mlir
`runtime-multiexit-heuristic.ll`
Added -unroll-runtime-other-exit-predictable=false in
runtime-multiexit-heuristic.ll to make it more robust.
runtime-multiexit-heuristic.ll intention is to test
-unroll-runtime-multi-exit=false, so the default value of
-unroll-runtime-other-exit-predictable should not impact the result.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98098
This is a patch that adds folding of two logical and/ors that share one variable:
a && (a && b) -> a && b
a && (a & b) -> a && b
...
This is towards removing the poison-unsafe select optimization (D93065 has more context).
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96945
The MemorySSA-based implementation has been enabled without issue
for a while now, so keeping the old implementation around doesn't
seem useful anymore. This drops the MemDep-based implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97877
This fixes another unsafe select folding by disabling it if
EnableUnsafeSelectTransform is set to false.
EnableUnsafeSelectTransform's default value is true, hence it won't
affect generated code (unless the flag is explicitly set to false).
This patch makes FoldBranchToCommonDest merge branch conditions into `select i1` rather than `and/or i1` when it is called by SimplifyCFG.
It is known that merging conditions into and/or is poison-unsafe, and this is towards making things *more* correct by removing possible miscompilations.
Currently, InstCombine simply consumes these selects into and/or of i1 (which is also unsafe), so the visible effect would be very small. The unsafe select -> and/or transformation will be removed in the future.
There has been efforts for updating optimizations to support the select form as well, and they are linked to D93065.
The safe transformation is fired when it is called by SimplifyCFG only. This is done by setting the new `PoisonSafe` argument as true.
Another place that calls FoldBranchToCommonDest is LoopSimplify. `PoisonSafe` flag is set to false in this case because enabling it has a nontrivial impact in performance because SCEV is more conservative with select form and InductiveRangeCheckElimination isn't aware of select form of and/or i1.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95026
Hello all,
I'm trying to fix unsafe propagation of poison values in and/or conditions by using
equivalent select forms (`select i1 A, i1 B, i1 false` and `select i1 A, i1 true, i1 false`)
instead.
D93065 has links to patches for this.
This patch allows unswitch to happen if the condition is in this form as well.
`collectHomogenousInstGraphLoopInvariants` is updated to keep traversal if
Root and the visiting I matches both m_LogicalOr()/m_LogicalAnd().
Other than this, the remaining changes are almost straightforward and simply replaces
Instruction::And/Or check with match(m_LogicalOr()/m_LogicalAnd()).
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97756
When materializing an available load value, do not explicitly
materialize the undef values from dead blocks. Doing so will
will force creation of a phi with an undef operand, even if there
is a dominating definition. The phi will be folded away on
subsequent GVN iterations, but by then we may have already
poisoned MDA cache slots.
Simply don't register these values in the first place, and let
SSAUpdater do its thing.
What this test illustrates is that GVN inserts an unnecessary
phi node initially, which prevents alias analysis from establishing
NoAlias, and MDA caches that result. We would be able to fully fold
this after another -gvn run with clean MDA.
Add support to widen call instructions in VPlan native path by using a correct recipe when such instructions are encountered. This is already used by inner loop vectorizer.
Previously call instructions got handled by wrong recipes and resulted in unreachable instruction errors like this one: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48139.
Patch by Mauri Mustonen <mauri.mustonen@tuni.fi>
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97278
It's just a wrong thing to do.
We introduce inttoptr where there were none, which results in
loosing all provenance information because we no longer have a GEP{i,},
and pessimize all future optimizations,
because we are basically not allowed to look past `inttoptr`.
(gep i8* X, -(ptrtoint Y)) *is* the canonical form.
So just drop this fold.
Noticed while reviewing D98120.
These intrinsics, not the icmp+select are the canonical form nowadays,
so we might as well directly emit them.
This should not cause any regressions, but if it does,
then then they would needed to be fixed regardless.
Note that this doesn't deal with `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansion()`,
but that is a pessimization, not a correctness issue.
Additionally, the non-intrinsic form has issues with undef,
see https://reviews.llvm.org/D88287#2587863
GVN basically doesn't handle phi nodes at all. This is for a reason - we can't value number their inputs since the predecessor blocks have probably not been visited yet.
However, it also creates a significant pass ordering problem. As it stands, instcombine and simplifycfg ends up implementing CSE of phi nodes. This means that for any series of CSE opportunities intermixed with phi nodes, we end up having to alternate instcombine/simplifycfg and gvn to make progress.
This patch handles the simplest case by simply preprocessing the phi instructions in a block, and CSEing them if they are syntactically identical. This turns out to be powerful enough to handle many cases in a single invocation of GVN since blocks which use the cse'd phi results are visited after the block containing the phi. If there's a CSE opportunity in one the phi predecessors required to recognize the phi CSE opportunity, that will require a second iteration on the function. (Still within a single run of gvn though.)
Compile time wise, this could go either way. On one hand, we're potentially causing GVN to iterate over the function more. On the other, we're cutting down on iterations between two passes and potentially shrinking the IR aggressively. So, a bit unclear what to expect.
Note that this does still rely on instcombine to canonicalize block order of the phis, but that's a one time transformation independent of the values incoming to the phi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98080
As a pragmatic tradeoff, the ease of updating the tests outweighs the slightly easier to understand test conditions. Where revevant, debug output was converted to comments to help human understanding.
There seems to be an impedance mismatch between what the type
system considers an aggregate (structs and arrays) and what
constants consider an aggregate (structs, arrays and vectors).
Rather than adjusting the type check, simply drop it entirely,
as getAggregateElement() is well-defined for non-aggregates: It
simply returns null in that case.
Instead of handling a number of special cases for selects, handle
this generally when inferring ranges from conditions. We already
infer ranges from `x + C pred C2` to `x`, so doing the same for
`x pred C2` to `x + C` is straightforward.
These tests didn't test the pattern they were supposed to, because
%a instead of %add was used in the select, which turned this into
a normal min/max).
Noticed this when commenting out the clamp handling code did not
result in any test failures...
The last two operands to a gc.relocate represent indices into the associated gc.statepoint's gc bundle list. (Effectively, gc.relocates are projections from the gc.statepoints multiple return values.)
We can use this to recognize when two gc.relocates are equivalent (and can be CSEd), even when the indices are non-equal. This is particular useful when considering a chain of multiple statepoints as it lets us eliminate all duplicate gc.relocates in a single pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97974
(Note: Part of the reviewed change was split and landed as f352463a)
For some reason, we had been marking gc.relocates as reading memory. There's no known reason for this, and I suspect it to be a legacy of very early implementation conservatism. gc.relocate and gc.result are simply projections of the return values from the associated statepoint. Note that the LangRef has always declared them readnone.
The EarlyCSE change is simply moving the special casing from readonly to readnone handling.
As noted by the test diffs, this does allow some additional CSE when relocates are separated by stores, but since we generate gc.relocates in batches, this is unlikely to help anything in practice.
This was reviewed as part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D97974, but split at reviewer request before landing. The motivation is to enable the GVN changes in that patch.
If we have a value live over a call which is used for deopt at the call, we know that the value must be a base pointer. We can avoid potentially inserting IR to materialize a base for this value.
In it's current form, this is mostly a compile time optimization. Building the base pointer graph (and then optimizing it away again) is a relatively expensive operation. We also sometimes end up with better codegen in practice - due to failures in optimizing away the inserted base pointer propogation - but those are optimization bugs we're fixing concurrently.
The alternative to this would be to extend the base pointer inference with the ability to generally reuse multiple-base input instructions (phis and selects). That's somewhat invasive and complicated, so we're defering it a bit longer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97885
The new test llvm/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/remove-assume-block.ll
breaks on non-X86 machines. Change it to look like the existing test
llvm/test/Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/delete-assume-dead-code.ll
to fix it.
Reviewed By: bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97952
There are certain loops like this below:
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
a[i] = b[i] + 1;
*inv = a[i];
}
that can only be vectorised if we are able to extract the last lane of the
vectorised form of 'a[i]'. For fixed width vectors this already works since
we know at compile time what the final lane is, however for scalable vectors
this is a different story. This patch adds support for extracting the last
lane from a scalable vector using a runtime determined lane value. I have
added support to VPIteration for runtime-determined lanes that still permit
the caching of values. I did this by introducing a new class called VPLane,
which describes the lane we're dealing with and provides interfaces to get
both the compile-time known lane and the runtime determined value. Whilst
doing this work I couldn't find any explicit tests for extracting the last
lane values of fixed width vectors so I added tests for both scalable and
fixed width vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95139
By implementing the method "unsigned RISCVTTIImpl::getRegisterBitWidth(bool Vector)",
fixed-length vectorization is enabled when possible. Without this method, the
"#pragma clang loop" directive is needed to enable vectorization(or the cost model
may inform LLVM that "Vectorization is possible but not beneficial").
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97549
sample loader pass.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5fb65c02ca5e91e7e1a00e0efdb8edc899f3e4b9,
to prevent repeated indirect call promotion for the same indirect call
and the same target, we used zero-count value profile to indicate an
indirect call has been promoted for a certain target. We removed
PromotedInsns cache in the same patch. However, there was a problem in
that patch described below, and that problem led me to add PromotedInsns
back as a mitigation in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4ffad1fb489f691825d6c7d78e1626de142f26cf.
When we get value profile from metadata by calling getValueProfDataFromInst,
we need to specify the maximum possible number of values we expect to read.
We uses MaxNumPromotions in the last patch so the maximum number of value
information extracted from metadata is MaxNumPromotions. If we have many
values including zero-count values when we write the metadata, some of them
will be dropped when we read them because we only read MaxNumPromotions
values. It will allow repeated indirect call promotion again. We need to
make sure if there are values indicating promoted targets, those values need
to be saved in metadata with higher priority than other values.
The patch fixed that problem. We change to use -1 to represent the count
of a promoted target instead of 0 so it is easier to sort the values.
When we prepare to update the metadata in updateIDTMetaData, we will sort
the values in the descending count order and extract only MaxNumPromotions
values to write into metadata. Since -1 is the max uint64_t number, if we
have equal to or less than MaxNumPromotions of -1 count values, they will
all be kept in metadata. If we have more than MaxNumPromotions of -1 count
values, we will only save MaxNumPromotions such values maximally. In such
case, we have logic in place in doesHistoryAllowICP to guarantee no more
promotion in sample loader pass will happen for the indirect call, because
it has been promoted enough.
With this change, now we can remove PromotedInsns without problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97350
This code assumed that FP math was only permissable if it was
fully "fast", so it hard-coded "fast" when creating new instructions.
The underlying code already allows matching recurrences/reductions
that are only "reassoc", so this change should prevent the potential
miscompile seen in the test diffs (we created "fast" ops even though
none existed in the original code).
I don't know if we need to create the temporary IRBuilder objects
used here, so that could be follow-up clean-up.
There's an open question about whether we should require "nsz" in
addition to "reassoc" here. InstCombine uses that combo for its
reassociative folds, but I think codegen is not as strict.
This enhances the auto-init remark with information about the variable
that is auto-initialized.
This is based of debug info if available, or alloca names (mostly for
development purposes).
```
auto-init.c:4:7: remark: Call to memset inserted by -ftrivial-auto-var-init. Memory operation size: 4096 bytes.Variables: var (4096 bytes). [-Rpass-missed=annotation-remarks]
int var[1024];
^
```
This allows to see things like partial initialization of a variable that
the optimizer won't be able to completely remove.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97734
Simon Pilgrim