Copy it instead. Otherwise, key registers (such as RBP) may get zeroed
out by the stack unwinder.
Fixes CrashRecoveryTest.DumpStackCleanup with MSVC in release builds.
Reviewed By: stella.stamenova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73809
Saves 2427 unneeded includes of TypeSize.h, which instantiates
std::tie<uint64_t, bool>, which instantiates std::tuple<uint64_t, bool>,
which is slow.
I'll remove the tie in a follow-up, since it's just for operator==.
Value::GetValueByteSize() reports the size of a Value as the size of its
underlying CompilerType. However, a host buffer that backs a Value may
be smaller than GetValueByteSize().
This situation arises when the host is only able to partially evaluate a
Value, e.g. because the expression contains DW_OP_piece.
The cleanest fix I've found to this problem is Greg's suggestion, which
is to resize the Value if (after evaluating an expression) it's found to
be too small. I've tried several alternatives which all (in one way or
the other) tried to teach the Value/ValueObjectChild system not to read
past the end of a host buffer, but this was flaky and impractical as it
isn't easy to figure out the host buffer's size (Value::GetScalar() can
point to somewhere /inside/ a host buffer, but you need to walk up the
ValueObject hierarchy to try and find its size).
This fixes an ASan error in lldb seen when debugging a clang binary.
I've added a regression test in test/functionalities/optimized_code. The
point of that test is not specifically to check that DW_OP_piece is
handled a particular way, but rather to check that lldb doesn't crash on
an input that it used to crash on.
Testing: check-lldb, and running the added tests using a sanitized lldb
--
Thanks to Jim for pointing out that an earlier version of this patch,
which simply changed the definition of Value::GetValueByteSize(), would
interact poorly with the ValueObject machinery.
Thanks also to Pavel who suggested a neat way to test this change
(which, incidentally, caught another ASan issue still present in the
original version of this patch).
rdar://58665925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73148
The configuration for -fPIC in the builtins library when built standalone
is unconditional, stating that the flags would "normally be added... by
the llvm cmake step"
This is untrue, as the llvm cmake step checks LLVM_ENABLE_PIC, which allows
a client to turn off -fPIC.
I've added an option when compiler-rt builtins are configured standalone, such
as when built as part of the LLVM runtimes system, to guard the application of
-fPIC for users that want it.
Patch By: JamesNagurne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72950
Significant missing hashing - as per the comment this was only meant to
skip member functions (unspecified, but I think it's legible as member
function declarations, not definitions) but was skipping all named
subprograms (so only hashed child DIEs for member function definitions -
because they didn't have a direct name, but only a name given indirectly
in the DW_AT_specification-referenced DIE)
Summary:
This patch introduces an alternative calling convention for
MemRef function arguments in LLVM dialect. It converts MemRef
function arguments to LLVM bare pointers to the MemRef element
type instead of creating a MemRef descriptor. Bare pointers are
then promoted to a MemRef descriptors at the beginning of the
function. This calling convention is only enabled with a flag.
Reviewers: ftynse, bondhugula, nicolasvasilache, rriddle, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: ftynse, rriddle, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: Joonsoo, flaub, merge_guards_bot, jholewinski, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, csigg, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, herhut, aartbik, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72802
Summary: Just like templates, they are excepted from the ODR rule.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923
Summary:
This changes a couple of parameters in the default Android config to
address some performance and memory footprint issues (well to be closer
to the default Bionic allocator numbers).
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73750
Specializations of the Platform class print the kernel after calling the
super method. By printing the kernel at the end in the super class, we
guarantee the order is the same on different platforms.
Summary:
Implements the jump pseudo-instruction, which is used in e.g. the Linux kernel.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73178
This change has two components. The moves the generated file
for a namespace to the directory named after the namespace in
a file named 'index.<format>'. This greatly improves the browsing
experience since the index page is shown by default for a directory.
The second improves the markdown output by adding the links to the
referenced pages for children objects and the link back to the source
code.
Patch By: Clayton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72954
instead of the "enabled by default" color.
It may be technically correct to list unimplemented diagnostics as
"enabled by default" but it's quite misleading.
This patch changes the behavior of the substrs argument to self.expect.
Currently, the elements of substrs are unordered and as long as the
string appears in the output, the assertion passes.
We can be more precise by requiring that the substrings be ordered in
the way they appear. My hope is that this will make it harder to
accidentally pass a check because a string appears out of order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
This revision does the following post-commit cleanups:
1. don't use -1 magic constants,
2. drop commented out old test that does not belong here,
3. reformat and add a proper clang-format off on a CHECK directive.
This test didn't need any local variables or parameters, and didn't need
to be checking the DWO ID or more detailed forms.
It was using -v to print the macro sections, but now that macro sections
are emitted when requested (-debug-macro) that's not needed either.
types are needed to compute the return type of a defaulted operator<=>.
This raises the question of what to do if return type deduction fails.
The standard doesn't say, and implementations vary, so for now reject
that case eagerly to keep our options open.
If dumping an Split DWARF file that hasn't been split into separate
files (such as from llc - that includes the plain and .dwo sections in
the same file) allow both macinfo and macinfo.dwo sections to be dumped.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Summary:
This revision beefs up the debug logging within dialect conversion. Given the nature of multi-level legalization, and legalization in general, it is one of the harder pieces of infrastructure to debug. This revision adds nice formatting to make the output log easier to parse:
```
Legalizing operation : 'std.constant'(0x608000002420) {
* Fold {
} -> FAILURE : unable to fold
* Pattern : 'std.constant -> ()' {
} -> FAILURE : pattern failed to match
* Pattern : 'std.constant -> ()' {
} -> FAILURE : pattern failed to match
* Pattern : 'std.constant -> (spv.constant)' {
** Insert : 'spv.constant'(0x608000002c20)
** Replace : 'std.constant'(0x608000002420)
//===-------------------------------------------===//
Legalizing operation : 'spv.constant'(0x608000002c20) {
} -> SUCCESS : operation marked legal by the target
//===-------------------------------------------===//
} -> SUCCESS : pattern applied successfully
} -> SUCCESS
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73747
Summary: With the new pass manager, it is not possible to obtain a pointer to the pass.
Reviewers: jfb, rinon, yln
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73390
Summary:
Rationale:
When lowering to LLVM for different rank insert (n vs k), the offset
arrays needs to drop one dimension (becomes n-1), but the strides
array needs to be preserved (remains k). With regression test.
Note that this example was actually in the documentation, so
extra important to do it right :-)
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, andydavis1, ftynse
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, ftynse
Subscribers: Joonsoo, merge_guards_bot, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73733
Summary: With the new pass manager, it is not possible to obtain a pointer to the pass.
Reviewers: jfb, rinon, yln
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73390
Summary:
Applying this cleanup:
- MIRBuilder.buildInstr(TargetOpcode::G_ASHR)
- .addDef(Shifted)
- .addUse(Res)
- .addUse(ShiftAmt);
+ MIRBuilder.buildAShr(Shifted, Res, ShiftAmt);
caused an assertion failure here:
llc: /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.cpp:404: llvm::MachineInstr *llvm::MachineRegisterInfo::getVRegDef(unsigned int) const: Assertion `(I.atEnd() || std::next(I) == def_instr_end()) && "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition"' failed.
#4 0x00000000050a6d96 in llvm::MachineRegisterInfo::getVRegDef (this=0x74606a0, Reg=2147483650) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.cpp:403
#5 0x00000000066148f6 in llvm::getConstantVRegValWithLookThrough (VReg=2147483650, MRI=..., LookThroughInstrs=false, HandleFConstant=true) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:244
#6 0x00000000066147da in llvm::getConstantVRegVal (VReg=2147483650, MRI=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:210
#7 0x0000000006615367 in llvm::ConstantFoldBinOp (Opcode=101, Op1=2147483650, Op2=2147483656, MRI=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/Utils.cpp:341
#8 0x000000000657eee0 in llvm::CSEMIRBuilder::buildInstr (this=0x7465010, Opc=101, DstOps=..., SrcOps=..., Flag=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/CSEMIRBuilder.cpp:160
#9 0x0000000003645958 in llvm::MachineIRBuilder::buildAShr (this=0x7465010, Dst=..., Src0=..., Src1=..., Flags=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/MachineIRBuilder.h:1298
#10 0x00000000065c35b1 in llvm::LegalizerHelper::lower (this=0x7fffffffb5f8, MI=..., TypeIdx=0, Ty=...) at /home/jayfoad2/git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizerHelper.cpp:2020
because at this point there are two instructions defining Res: the
original G_SMULO/G_UMULO and the new G_MUL that we built. The fix is
to modify the original mul in place, so that there is only ever one
definition of Res.
Reviewers: arsenm, aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: wdng, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72842
When you encounter a G_TRUNC, you are moving from a larger type to a smaller
type.
Asking for the i-th bit on a larger value is the same as asking for the i-th
bit on a smaller value.
So, we should always be able to walk through G_TRUNC when computing the bit
for a TB(N)Z.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73748
Matt Arsenault