Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
Some of the conditions necessary to produce ccmp sequences were only
checked in recursive calls to emitConjunctionDisjunctionTree() after
some of the earlier expressions were already built. Move all checks over
to isConjunctionDisjunctionTree() so they are all checked before we
start emitting instructions.
Also rename some variable to better reflect their usage.
llvm-svn: 258605
The current behavior is incorrect, as the two CCs returned by
changeFPCCToAArch64CC, intended to be OR'ed, are instead used
in an AND ccmp chain.
Consider:
define i32 @t(float %a, float %b, float %c, float %d, i32 %e, i32 %f) {
%cc1 = fcmp one float %a, %b
%cc2 = fcmp olt float %c, %d
%and = and i1 %cc1, %cc2
%r = select i1 %and, i32 %e, i32 %f
ret i32 %r
}
Assuming (%a < %b) and (%c < %d); we used to do:
fcmp s0, s1 # nzcv <- 1000
orr w8, wzr, #0x1 # w8 <- 1
csel w9, w8, wzr, mi # w9 <- 1
csel w8, w8, w9, gt # w8 <- 1
fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000
cset w9, mi # w9 <- 1
tst w8, w9 # (w8 & w9) == 1, so: nzcv <- 0000
csel w0, w0, w1, ne # w0 <- w0
We now do:
fcmp s2, s3 # nzcv <- 1000
fccmp s0, s1, #0, mi # mi, so: nzcv <- 1000
fccmp s0, s1, #8, le # !le, so: nzcv <- 1000
csel w0, w0, w1, pl # !pl, so: w0 <- w1
In other words, we transformed:
(c < d) && ((a < b) || (a > b))
into:
(c < d) && (a u>= b) && (a u<= b)
whereas, per De Morgan's, we wanted:
(c < d) && !((a u>= b) && (a u<= b))
Note that this problem doesn't occur in the test-suite.
changeFPCCToAArch64CC produces disjunct CCs; here, one -> mi/gt.
We can't represent that in the fccmp chain; it can't express
arbitrary OR sequences, as one comment explains:
In general we can create code for arbitrary "... (and (and A B) C)"
sequences. We can also implement some "or" expressions, because
"(or A B)" is equivalent to "not (and (not A) (not B))" and we can
implement some negation operations. [...] However there is no way
to negate the result of a partial sequence.
Instead, introduce changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC, which produces the
conjunct cond codes:
- (a one b)
== ((a olt b) || (a ogt b))
== ((a ord b) && (a une b))
- (a ueq b)
== ((a uno b) || (a oeq b))
== ((a ule b) && (a uge b))
Note that, at first, one might think that, when PushNegate is true,
we should use the disjunct CCs, in effect doing:
(a || b)
= !(!a && !(b))
= !(!a && !(b1 || b2)) <- changeFPCCToAArch64CC(b, b1, b2)
= !(!a && !b1 && !b2)
However, we can take advantage of the fact that the CC is already
negated, which lets us avoid special-casing PushNegate and doing
the simpler to reason about:
(a || b)
= !(!a && (!b))
= !(!a && (b1 && b2)) <- changeFPCCToANDAArch64CC(!b, b1, b2)
= !(!a && b1 && b2)
This makes both emitConditionalCompare cases behave identically,
and produces correct ccmp sequences for the 2-CC fcmps.
llvm-svn: 258533
We verify that the op tree is eligible for CCMP emission in
isConjunctionDisjunctionTree, but it's also possible that
emitConjunctionDisjunctionTree fails later.
The initial check is useful, as it avoids building nodes
that will get discarded.
Still, make sure that inconsistencies don't happen with
an assert.
llvm-svn: 258532
Summary:
SETCC with f16 vectors has OperationAction set to Expand but still gets
lowered to FCM* intrinsics based on its result type. This patch skips
lowering of VSETCC if the operand is an f16 vector.
v4 and v8 tests included.
Reviewers: ab, jmolloy
Subscribers: srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15361
llvm-svn: 258471
There was support for writing the AArch64 big endian data fixup entries in
the .eh_frame section in BE. This is changed to write all such fixup
entries in BE with no restriction on the section. This is similar to
the existing support for fixup entries for ARM.
A test is added to check the length field in the .debug_line section as
this is an example of where such a fixup occurs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16064
llvm-svn: 258320
The AArch64 .inst directive was implemented using EmitIntValue, which resulted
in both $x and $d (code and data) mapping symbols being emitted at the same
address. This fixes it to only emit the $x mapping symbol.
EmitIntValue also emits the value in big-endian order when targeting big-endian
systems, but instructions are always emitted in little-endian order for
AArch64.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16349
llvm-svn: 258308
Summary:
GEPOperator: provide getResultElementType alongside getSourceElementType.
This is made possible by adding a result element type field to GetElementPtrConstantExpr, which GetElementPtrInst already has.
GEP: replace get(Pointer)ElementType uses with get{Source,Result}ElementType.
Reviewers: mjacob, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16275
llvm-svn: 258145
When we have a single basic block, the explicit copy-back instructions should
be inserted right before the terminator. Before this fix, they were wrongly
placed at the beginning of the basic block.
I will commit fixes to other platforms as well.
PR26136
llvm-svn: 257929
Summary:
This pass may modify the Cmp operands. However, the flag reg may be used by both the branch and CSEL.
Modifying CMP will have side effect on CSEL.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16147
llvm-svn: 257844
In the discussion on http://reviews.llvm.org/D15730, Andy pointed out we had a utility function for merging MMO lists. Since it turned we actually had two copies and there's another review in progress (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15230) which needs the same, extract it into a utility function and clean up the interfaces to make it easier to use with a MachineInstBuilder.
I introduced a pair here to track size and allocation together. I think we should probably move in the direction of the MachineOperandsRef helper class, but I'm leaving that for further work. I want to get the poison state introduced before I make major changes to the interface.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15757
llvm-svn: 256909
This is a recommit of r256004 which was reverted in r256160. The issue was the
incorrect promotion for half and byte loads transformed into mov instructions.
This fix will replace half and byte type loads only with bit field extracts.
Original commit message:
This change promotes load instructions which directly read from stored by
replacing them with mov instructions. If the store is wider than the load,
the load will be replaced with a bitfield extract.
For example :
STRWui %W1, %X0, 1
%W0 = LDRHHui %X0, 3
becomes
STRWui %W1, %X0, 1
%W0 = UBFMWri %W1, 16, 31
llvm-svn: 256249
This patch adds to the target description two additional patterns for matching
extract-extend operations to SMOV. The patterns catch the v16i8-to-i64 and
v8i16-to-i64 cases. The existing patterns miss these cases because the
extracted elements must first be legalized to i32, resulting in any_extend
nodes.
This was originally implemented as a DAG combine (r255895), but was reverted
due to failing out-of-tree tests.
llvm-svn: 256176
Disable post-ra scheduler for perturbed tests to appease the bots and to
preserve the history of the tests.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15652
llvm-svn: 256158
This change promotes load instructions which directly read from stores by
replacing them with mov instructions. If the store is wider than the load,
the load will be replaced with a bitfield extract.
For example :
STRWui %W1, %X0, 1
%W0 = LDRHHui %X0, 3
becomes
STRWui %W1, %X0, 1
%W0 = UBFMWri %W1, 16, 31
llvm-svn: 256004
This patch enables PostRAScheduler specifically for AArch64 generic build,
which is beneficial from the performance perspective.
Speedups up to 2 to 7% for some benchmarks on A57 and A53 are observed.
Also benchmarks from LLVM test-suite did not regress.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15557
llvm-svn: 255896
This patch adds a DAG combine for (any_extend (extract_vector_elt v, i)) ->
(extract_vector_elt v, i). The combine enables us to better match some SMOV
patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15515
llvm-svn: 255895
The access function has a short entry and a short exit, the initialization
block is only run the first time. To improve the performance, we want to
have a short frame at the entry and exit.
We explicitly handle most of the CSRs via copies. Only the CSRs that are not
handled via copies will be in CSR_SaveList.
Frame lowering and prologue/epilogue insertion will generate a short frame
in the entry and exit according to CSR_SaveList. The majority of the CSRs will
be handled by register allcoator. Register allocator will try to spill and
reload them in the initialization block.
We add CSRsViaCopy, it will be explicitly handled during lowering.
1> we first set FunctionLoweringInfo->SplitCSR if conditions are met (the target
supports it for the given machine function and the function has only return
exits). We also call TLI->initializeSplitCSR to perform initialization.
2> we call TLI->insertCopiesSplitCSR to insert copies from CSRsViaCopy to
virtual registers at beginning of the entry block and copies from virtual
registers to CSRsViaCopy at beginning of the exit blocks.
3> we also need to make sure the explicit copies will not be eliminated.
The target independent portion was committed as r255353.
rdar://problem/23557469
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15341
llvm-svn: 255821
This patch adds some missing calls to MBB::normalizeSuccProbs() in several
locations where it should be called. Those places are found by checking if the
sum of successors' probabilities is approximate one in MachineBlockPlacement
pass with some instrumented code (not in this patch).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15259
llvm-svn: 255455
After much discussion, ending here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151123/315620.html
it has been decided that, instead of having the vectorizer directly generate
special absdiff and horizontal-add intrinsics, we'll recognize the relevant
reduction patterns during CodeGen. Accordingly, these intrinsics are not needed
(the operations they represent can be pattern matched, as is already done in
some backends). Thus, we're backing these out in favor of the current
development work.
r248483 - Codegen: Fix llvm.*absdiff semantic.
r242546 - [ARM] Use [SU]ABSDIFF nodes instead of intrinsics for VABD/VABA
r242545 - [AArch64] Use [SU]ABSDIFF nodes instead of intrinsics for ABD/ABA
r242409 - [Codegen] Add intrinsics 'absdiff' and corresponding SDNodes for absolute difference operation
llvm-svn: 255387
Chris Bieneman