Commit Graph

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 407659ab0a Revert "Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.""
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037

Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now

llvm-svn: 348053
2018-11-30 23:41:18 +00:00
Fangrui Song f5d3335d75 Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:

  extern char extern_var;
  struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};

llvm-svn: 348039
2018-11-30 21:26:09 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 48ee4ad325 Re-commit r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.

llvm-svn: 347756
2018-11-28 14:04:12 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 8c79706e89 Revert r347417 "Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures."
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:

  static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
    return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
  }

  int arr[] = {1,2,3};

  bool g() {
    return f(arr, arr + 3);
  }

  $ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -

g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.

This also reverts the follow-up commits.

r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!

r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.

r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.

r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.

r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.

llvm-svn: 347656
2018-11-27 14:01:40 +00:00
Bill Wendling 1af8dd6a1e isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
__builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
constant.

llvm-svn: 347512
2018-11-24 10:45:55 +00:00
Bill Wendling 6ff1751f7d Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
__builtin_constant_p().

Third time's a charm!

llvm-svn: 347417
2018-11-21 20:44:18 +00:00
Nico Weber 9f0246d473 Revert r347364 again, the fix was incomplete.
llvm-svn: 347389
2018-11-21 12:47:43 +00:00
Bill Wendling 91549ed15f Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
EvaluateAsInt() is sometimes called in a constant context. When that's the
case, we need to specify it as so.

llvm-svn: 347364
2018-11-20 23:24:16 +00:00
Nico Weber 6438972553 Revert 347294, it turned many bots on lab.llvm.org:8011/console red.
llvm-svn: 347314
2018-11-20 15:27:43 +00:00
Bill Wendling 107b0e9881 Use is.constant intrinsic for __builtin_constant_p
Summary:
A __builtin_constant_p may end up with a constant after inlining. Use
the is.constant intrinsic if it's a variable that's in a context where
it may resolve to a constant, e.g., an argument to a function after
inlining.

Reviewers: rsmith, shafik

Subscribers: jfb, kristina, cfe-commits, nickdesaulniers, jyknight

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54355

llvm-svn: 347294
2018-11-20 08:53:30 +00:00
Bill Wendling 8003edc9aa Compound literals, enums, et al require const expr
Summary:
Compound literals,  enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.

Reviewers: rsmith, shafik

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921

llvm-svn: 346455
2018-11-09 00:41:36 +00:00
Aaron Ballman 8c20828b5c Re-commit r321223, which adds a printing policy to the ASTDumper.
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.

Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.

llvm-svn: 321310
2017-12-21 21:42:42 +00:00
Aaron Ballman 9d6501f6cd Reverting r321223 and its follow-up commit because of failing bots due to Misc/ast-dump-color.cpp.
llvm-svn: 321229
2017-12-20 23:17:29 +00:00
Aaron Ballman 207ee3d0a7 Add a printing policy to the ASTDumper.
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.

llvm-svn: 321223
2017-12-20 22:04:54 +00:00
John McCall 9648288c38 A compound literal within a global lambda or block is still within
the body of a function for the purposes of computing its storage
duration and deciding whether its initializer must be constant.

There are a number of problems in our current treatment of compound
literals.  C specifies that a compound literal yields an l-value
referring to an object with either static or automatic storage
duration, depending on where it was written; in the latter case,
the literal object has a lifetime tied to the enclosing scope (much
like an ObjC block), not the enclosing full-expression.  To get these
semantics fully correct in our current design, we would need to
collect compound literals on the ExprWithCleanups, just like we do
with ObjC blocks; we would probably also want to identify literals
like we do with materialized temporaries.  But it gets stranger;
GCC adds compound literals to C++ as an extension, but makes them
r-values, which are generally assumed to have temporary storage
duration.  Ignoring destructor ordering, the difference only matters
if the object's address escapes the full-expression, which for an
r-value can only happen with reference binding (which extends
temporaries) or array-to-pointer decay (which does not).  GCC then
attempts to lock down on array-to-pointer decay in ad hoc ways.
Arguably a far superior language solution for C++ (and perhaps even
array r-values in C, which can occur in other ways) would be to
propagate lifetime extension through array-to-pointer decay, so
that initializing a pointer object to a decayed r-value array
extends the lifetime of the complete object containing the array.
But this would be a major change in semantics which arguably ought
to be blessed by the committee(s).

Anyway, I'm not fixing any of that in this patch; I did try, but
it got out of hand.

Fixes rdar://28949016.

llvm-svn: 285643
2016-10-31 21:56:26 +00:00
Eli Friedman 4a962f03be Tweak changes in r186464 to avoid a crash.
Currently, IR generation can't handle file-scope compound literals with
non-constant initializers in C++.

Fixes PR17415 (the first crash in the bug).

(We should probably change (T){1,2,3} to use the same codepath as T{1,2,3} in
C++ eventually, given that the semantics of the latter are actually defined by
the standard.)

llvm-svn: 191719
2013-10-01 00:28:29 +00:00
Jordan Rose 6c0505e4eb Fix representation of compound literals for C++ objects with destructors.
Previously, this compound literal expression (a GNU extension in C++):

  (AggregateWithDtor){1, 2}

resulted in this AST:

 `-CXXBindTemporaryExpr [...] 'struct Point' (CXXTemporary [...])
   `-CompoundLiteralExpr [...] 'struct AggregateWithDtor'
     `-CXXBindTemporaryExpr [...] 'struct AggregateWithDtor' (CXXTemporary [...])
       `-InitListExpr [...] 'struct AggregateWithDtor'
         |-IntegerLiteral [...] 'int' 1
         `-IntegerLiteral [...] 'int' 2

Note the two CXXBindTemporaryExprs. The InitListExpr is really part of the
CompoundLiteralExpr, not an object in its own right. By introducing a new
entity initialization kind in Sema specifically for compound literals, we
avoid the treatment of the inner InitListExpr as a temporary.

 `-CXXBindTemporaryExpr [...] 'struct Point' (CXXTemporary [...])
   `-CompoundLiteralExpr [...] 'struct AggregateWithDtor'
     `-InitListExpr [...] 'struct AggregateWithDtor'
       |-IntegerLiteral [...] 'int' 1
       `-IntegerLiteral [...] 'int' 2

llvm-svn: 181212
2013-05-06 16:48:12 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis 8566356acb When building a compound literal, check that the base element of the array is complete.
Fixes rdar://8620582 & http://llvm.org/PR7905

llvm-svn: 118428
2010-11-08 19:14:19 +00:00