https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33904
Happens when static function is accessed via the class variable. That leads to incorrect overloads number because the variable is considered as the first argument.
struct Bar {
static void foo(); static void foo(int);
};
int main() {
Bar b;
b.foo(/*complete here*/); // did not work before
Bar::foo(/*complete here*/); // worked fine
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36390
llvm-svn: 316646
The code building the code completion string for overloads was providing
less detail compared to the one building completion strings for function
declarations. There was no information about optionals and no information
about what's a parameter and what's a function identifier, everything
besides ResultType, CurrentParameter and special characters was classified
as Text.
This makes code completion strings for overload candidates to follow a
pattern very similar, but not identical, to the one in use for function
declarations:
- return type chunk: ResultType
- function identifier chunk: Text
- parameter chunks: Placeholder
- optional parameter chunks: Optional
- current parameter chunk: CurrentParameter
llvm-svn: 227309
The improved completion in call context now works with:
- Functions.
- Member functions.
- Constructors.
- New expressions.
- Function call expressions.
- Template variants of the previous.
There are still rough edges to be fixed:
- Provide support for optional parameters. (fix known)
- Provide support for member initializers. (fix known)
- Provide support for variadic template functions. (fix unknown)
- Others?
llvm-svn: 226670
Ivan Donchevskii