instructions
Summary: This patch makes `x86AssemblyInspectionEngine` to process zero value of
the `B` field of the `REX` prefix in a correct way for `PUSH` and `POP`
instructions. MSVC sometimes emits `pushq %rbp` instruction as `0x40 0x55`, and
it was not parsed correctly before.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda, labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57745
llvm-svn: 353281
LLDB testsuite fails when built by GCC8 on:
LLDB :: SymbolFile/DWARF/find-basic-namespace.cpp
This is because this code in LLDB codebase has undefined behavior:
#include <algorithm>
#include <string.h>
// lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp:1731
static struct section_64 {
char sectname[16];
char segname[16];
} sect64 = { {'_','_','a','p','p','l','e','_','n','a','m','e','s','p','a','c'}, "__DWARF" };
int main() {
return std::min<size_t>(strlen(sect64.sectname), sizeof(sect64.sectname));
}
It has been discussed as a (false) bugreport to GCC:
wrong-code: LLDB testcase fails: SymbolFile/DWARF/find-basic-namespace.cpp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672436
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57781
llvm-svn: 353280
This patch introduces a new tool called 'lldb-instr'. It automates the
workflow of inserting LLDB_RECORD and LLDB_REGSITER macros for
instrumentation.
Because the tool won't be part of the build process, I didn't want to
over-complicate it. SB_RECORD macros are inserted in place, while
SB_REGISTER macros are printed to stdout, and have to be manually copied
into the Registry's constructor. Additionally, the utility makes no
attempt to properly format the inserted macros. Please use clang-format
to format the changes after running the tool.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56822
llvm-svn: 353271
Previously, there were two different scripts for generating VCS headers:
one used by LLVM and one used by Clang and lldb. They were both similar,
but different. They were both broken in their own ways, for example the
one used by Clang didn't properly handle monorepo resulting in an
incorrect version information reported by Clang.
This change unifies two the scripts by introducing a new script that's
used from both LLVM, Clang and lldb, ensures that the new script
supports both monorepo and standalone SVN and Git setups, and removes
the old scripts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57063
llvm-svn: 353268
An equivalent change was made to RemapPaths, but it needed to be made
here as well. Also added a test for this and made the setup a little
more complex to avoid false successes.
<rdar://problem/47642498>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57552
llvm-svn: 353243
Type punning through a union -> no good.
double to uint64 to double again -> no good either.
The nice side effect, other than silencing the sanitizer bot
is that it fixes the formatting of some dates, e.g. Jan 1st 1970.
<rdar://problem/47617983>
llvm-svn: 353191
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
libc++ has programmable ABI versioning controllable with the _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
macro. Currently there are at least 3 settings used in real systems (1 as the
default, ndk1 for Anroid, Cr for Chromium).
Only the 1 and ndk1 cases were handled. This change relaxes the check to allow
any ABI version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57466
llvm-svn: 352899
stored relative to VFRAME
Summary:
This patch makes LLDB able to retrieve proper values for function arguments and
local variables stored in PDB relative to VFRAME register.
Patch contains retrieval of corresponding FPO table entries from PDB and a
generic translator from FPO programs to DWARF expressions to get correct VFRAME
value.
Patch also improves variables-locations.test and makes this test passable on
x86.
Patch By: leonid.mashinsky
Reviewers: zturner, asmith, stella.stamenova, aleksandr.urakov
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: arphaman, labath, mgorny, aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122
llvm-svn: 352845
The test was using ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_STREQ which meant we were
comparing string addresses instead of the actual string. This caused the
test to fail with with the sanitizers enabled.
llvm-svn: 352780
Summary:
The method find_matching_slice(self) uses uuid_str on one of the paths but the variable does not exist and so this results in a NameError exception if we take that path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57467
llvm-svn: 352772
One considers it integer division, the other doesn't.
Move to `//` (floor division) so that this test passes
independently from the version.
llvm-svn: 352706
Summary:
When we are creating a ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl in ParseTypeFromDWARF(...) we are not handling the case where variadic pack is empty in the specialization. This patch handles that case and adds a test to prevent future regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57363
llvm-svn: 352677
The current LLDB website is written in HTML which is hard to maintain.
We have quite a bit of HTML code checked in which can make it hard to
differentiate between documentation written by us and documentation
generated by a tool.
In line with the other LLVM projects, I propose generating the
documentation with Sphix. I think text/rst files provide a lower barrier
for new or casual contributors to fix or update.
This patch adds a copy of the LLDB website and documentation in
reStructuredText. It also adds a new ninja target `docs-lldb-html` when
-DLLVM_ENABLE_SPHINX:BOOL is enabled.
This is the first step in having the website and documentation being
generated from the repository, rather than having the output checked-in
under the www folder. During the hopefully short transition period,
please also update the reStructuredText files when modifying the
website.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55376
llvm-svn: 352644
Kuba Mracek