Summary:
The check should ignore the main function, the program entry point.
It is not possible to use `std::array<>` for the `argv`.
The alternative is to use `char** argv`.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40604 | PR40604 ]]
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, hans, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57787
llvm-svn: 353327
Summary:
The version bumps are a result of running `npm audit`, which found
3 security issues in previous versions of our dependencies.
Also add 'package-lock.json' to the repo, it's a common practice to
check in those files into the repository to get consistent versions of
dependencies when running on different machines.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: dschuff, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57814
llvm-svn: 353296
Summary:
This enables include insertion by adding canonical includes into
preambledata.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57508
llvm-svn: 353054
Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
llvm-svn: 352968
Summary:
This helps minimize the disruption of not returning declarations as part of
a find-definition response (r352864).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57580
llvm-svn: 352953
Summary:
This reduces the per-check implementation burden and redundant work.
It also makes checks range-aware by default (treating the commonAncestor
as if it were a point selection should be good baseline behavior).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57570
llvm-svn: 352876
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352875
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352874
Summary:
LSP now reflects the declaration/definition distinction.
Language server changes:
- textDocument/definition now returns a definition if one is found, otherwise
the declaration. It no longer returns declaration + definition if they are
distinct.
- textDocument/declaration returns the best declaration we can find.
- For macros, the active macro definition is returned for both methods.
- For include directive, the top of the target file is returned for both.
There doesn't appear to be a discovery mechanism (we can't return everything to
clients that only know about definition), so this changes existing behavior.
In practice, it should greatly reduce the fraction of the time we need to show
the user a menu of options.
C++ API changes:
- findDefinitions is replaced by locateSymbolAt, which returns a
vector<LocatedSymbol> - one for each symbol under the cursor.
- this contains the preferred declaration, the definition (if found), and
the symbol name
This API enables some potentially-neat extensions, like swapping between decl
and def, and exposing the symbol name to the UI in the case of multiple symbols.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57388
llvm-svn: 352864
Summary:
This would make diagnostic fixits more discoverable, especially for
plugins like YCM.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57509
llvm-svn: 352764
Summary:
The check `bugprone-exception-escape` does an AST-based analysis to determine
if a function might throw an exception and warns based on that information.
The analysis part is refactored into a standalone class similiar to
`ExprMutAnalyzer` that is generally useful.
I intent to use that class in a new check to automatically introduce `noexcept`
if possible.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57100
llvm-svn: 352741
This should not happen in normal operation, as it implies that the diagnostics
with some available fixes were produced but the AST is invalid.
Moreover, the code had an error: always returned code actions ignoring the
SupportsCodeAction capability and writing a test for this is impossible,
since this can only happen due to programmer's error rather than invalid inputs.
llvm-svn: 352624
This fixes most references to the paths:
llvm.org/svn/
llvm.org/git/
llvm.org/viewvc/
github.com/llvm-mirror/
github.com/llvm-project/
reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/
to instead point to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.
This is *not* a trivial substitution, because additionally, all the
checkout instructions had to be migrated to instruct users on how to
use the monorepo layout, setting LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS instead of
checking out various projects into various subdirectories.
I've attempted to not change any scripts here, only documentation. The
scripts will have to be addressed separately.
Additionally, I've deleted one document which appeared to be outdated
and unneeded:
lldb/docs/building-with-debug-llvm.txt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57330
llvm-svn: 352514
Summary:
This looks like a useful user-facing configuration parameter,
which should be discoverable.
Also fix a small typo in the description.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57384
llvm-svn: 352509
This should have been part of r352494, which added the corresponding
function. The unit test ended up as a separate commit accidentally.
llvm-svn: 352501
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
Summary:
USRs for macros were not cannonical due to usage of cursor location
instead of definition location.
Reviewers: jkorous
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57228
llvm-svn: 352481
Summary:
This enables clangd to intercept compiler diagnostics and attach fixes (e.g. by
querying index). This patch adds missing includes for incomplete types e.g.
member access into class with only forward declaration. This would allow adding
missing includes for user-typed symbol names that are missing declarations
(e.g. typos) in the future.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56903
llvm-svn: 352361
Summary:
Because _Float16 was disabled for X86 targets the unit-tests started failing.
Extract the pieces for _Float16 and run theses tests under AArch64.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: javed.absar, xazax.hun, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57249
llvm-svn: 352231
Roman Lebedev