Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
llvm-svn: 190898
Summary:
When selecting a mangling for an anonymous tag type:
- We should first try it's typedef'd name.
- If that doesn't work, we should mangle in the name of the declarator
that specified it as a declaration specifier.
- If that doesn't work, fall back to a static mangling of
<unnamed-type>.
This should make our anonymous type mangling compatible.
This partially fixes PR16994; we would need to have an implementation of
scope numbering to get it right (a separate issue).
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, rjmccall, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1540
llvm-svn: 190892
In particular, this means we emit non-external symbols defined to
variables, such as aliases or absolute addresses.
This is needed to implement /safeseh, and it appears there was some
confusion about what symbols to emit previously.
llvm-svn: 190888
Some of this code is no longer necessary since int<->ptr casts are no
longer occur as of r187444.
This also fixes handling vectors of pointers, and adds a bunch of new
testcases for vectors and address spaces.
llvm-svn: 190885
Documenting a design choice to generate only medium model sequences for TLS
addresses at this time. Small and large code models could be supported if
necessary.
llvm-svn: 190883
Large code model on PPC64 requires creating and referencing TOC entries when
using the addis/ld form of addressing. This was not being done in all cases.
The changes in this patch to PPCAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction() fix this. Two
test cases are also modified to reflect this requirement.
Fast-isel was not creating correct code for loading floating-point constants
using large code model. This also requires the addis/ld form of addressing.
Previously we were using the addis/lfd shortcut which is only applicable to
medium code model. One test case is modified to reflect this requirement.
llvm-svn: 190882
Upcoming SLP vectorization improvements will want to be able to estimate costs
of horizontal reductions. Add infrastructure to support this.
We model reductions as a series of (shufflevector,add) tuples ultimately
followed by an extractelement. For example, for an add-reduction of <4 x float>
we could generate the following sequence:
(v0, v1, v2, v3)
\ \ / /
\ \ /
+ +
(v0+v2, v1+v3, undef, undef)
\ /
((v0+v2) + (v1+v3), undef, undef)
%rdx.shuf = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx = fadd <4 x float> %rdx, %rdx.shuf
%rdx.shuf7 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx8 = fadd <4 x float> %bin.rdx, %rdx.shuf7
%r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx8, i32 0
This commit adds a cost model interface "getReductionCost(Opcode, Ty, Pairwise)"
that will allow clients to ask for the cost of such a reduction (as backends
might generate more efficient code than the cost of the individual instructions
summed up). This interface is excercised by the CostModel analysis pass which
looks for reduction patterns like the one above - starting at extractelements -
and if it sees a matching sequence will call the cost model interface.
We will also support a second form of pairwise reduction that is well supported
on common architectures (haddps, vpadd, faddp).
(v0, v1, v2, v3)
\ / \ /
(v0+v1, v2+v3, undef, undef)
\ /
((v0+v1)+(v2+v3), undef, undef, undef)
%rdx.shuf.0.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2 , i32 undef, i32 undef>
%rdx.shuf.0.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %rdx, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx.0 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.0.0, %rdx.shuf.0.1
%rdx.shuf.1.0 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%rdx.shuf.1.1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %bin.rdx.0, <4 x float> undef,
<4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef>
%bin.rdx.1 = fadd <4 x float> %rdx.shuf.1.0, %rdx.shuf.1.1
%r = extractelement <4 x float> %bin.rdx.1, i32 0
llvm-svn: 190876
We cannot use "GetMaxU64Bitfield" for non-power-of-two sizes, so just use
the same code that handles N > 8 for these.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1699
llvm-svn: 190873
We can't insert an insertelement after an invoke. We would have to split a
critical edge. So when we see a phi node that uses an invoke we just give up.
radar://14990770
llvm-svn: 190871
other in memory.
The motivation was to get rid of truncate and shift right instructions that get
in the way of paired load or floating point load.
E.g.,
Consider the following example:
struct Complex {
float real;
float imm;
};
When accessing a complex, llvm was generating a 64-bits load and the imm field
was obtained by a trunc(lshr) sequence, resulting in poor code generation, at
least for x86.
The idea is to declare that two load instructions is the canonical form for
loading two arithmetic type, which are next to each other in memory.
Two scalar loads at a constant offset from each other are pretty
easy to detect for the sorts of passes that like to mess with loads.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 190870
- searches frames beginning from the current frame, stops when an equivalent context is found
- not using GetStackFrameCount() for performance reasons
- fixes TestInlineStepping (clang/gcc buildbots)
llvm-svn: 190868
Add llvm.x86.* intrinsics for all of the Intel SHA Extensions instructions, as
well as tests. Also remove mayLoad and hasSideEffects, which can be inferred
from the instruction patterns.
llvm-svn: 190864
Before (with column limit 60):
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >
> aaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa >> aaaaa);
(Not sure how that could have stayed in that long without being
detected..)
llvm-svn: 190854
Reid Kleckner